<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: ImPostingOnHN</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=ImPostingOnHN</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 16:18:07 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=ImPostingOnHN" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ImPostingOnHN in "AWS Bedrock to require sharing data with Anthropic for Mythos and future models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why don't you think that? What I've read is that other models can find the same bugs.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 13:03:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48475691</link><dc:creator>ImPostingOnHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48475691</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48475691</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ImPostingOnHN in "German ruling declares Google liable for false answers in AI Overviews"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><i>> unless you consider transferring control back to the user at the very last minute before it crashes a proper way to handle risks</i><p>I don't think Tesla is based in China</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 05:08:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48471692</link><dc:creator>ImPostingOnHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48471692</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48471692</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ImPostingOnHN in "A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Building a Data Center"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><i>> Even conservation trusts make more sense to me. </i><p>That seems to be what was used here. Then the trust sold it for some cash.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:41:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454572</link><dc:creator>ImPostingOnHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454572</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454572</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ImPostingOnHN in "A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Building a Data Center"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><i>> I don't think you should be able to block development on land you donated indefinitely.</i><p>On land you contractually purchased with the condition that development be blocked indefinitely? Then why sign the contract? If they wanted a time limit, they could have put it in the contract, or not signed the contract.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 16:28:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48447456</link><dc:creator>ImPostingOnHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48447456</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48447456</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ImPostingOnHN in "U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ok, so your sole criticism of the tweet is that it uses "menstruators" to describe "people who menstruate".<p>My advice to you is to avoid getting so worked up over a single tweet (much less one which is normal), especially if it's just because it uses a single, clinical, inoffensive word you personally don't like. You're going to blow a coronary if you keep it up like this. Touch grass.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 12:42:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48411630</link><dc:creator>ImPostingOnHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48411630</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48411630</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ImPostingOnHN in "U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You're saying your sole criticism of the tweet is that it uses "menstruators" to describe "people who menstruate"?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 13:40:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398510</link><dc:creator>ImPostingOnHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398510</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398510</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ImPostingOnHN in "Failing grades soar with AI usage, dwindling math skills in Berkeley CS classes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><i>> I'm stupid and I use LLMs a lot but I can still meditate for 30 minutes.</i><p><i>> apparently some of the smartest people in the world have lost the skill?</i><p><i>> But the commenter haven't</i><p><i>> why?</i><p>Perhaps because a correlation you assumed was there (more smartness = more ability to sit still alone with one's thoughts), is not actually as strong as you thought? If one does not start with that assumption, there is no inherent conflict in the 3 pieces of evidence you cited.<p>Or perhaps because you are smarter than you give yourself credit for :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 05:24:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48394329</link><dc:creator>ImPostingOnHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48394329</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48394329</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ImPostingOnHN in "Failing grades soar with AI usage, dwindling math skills in Berkeley CS classes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I doubt that you doubt that. I think you actually believe they're speaking truthfully and in good faith.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 05:08:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48394181</link><dc:creator>ImPostingOnHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48394181</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48394181</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ImPostingOnHN in "U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>in order for that point to be made, there would first need to be a convincing case made that this thing doesn't produce meaningful results</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 04:29:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393851</link><dc:creator>ImPostingOnHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393851</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393851</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ImPostingOnHN in "U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><i>>  the senile grandpa was awakened and paraded around when it was strictly necessary, but for the most part, it was lunatics running the asylum</i><p>Unfortunately now we have both.<p><i>>  just look at this for example <a href="https://xcancel.com/USDOL/status/1795879796599111997" rel="nofollow">https://xcancel.com/USDOL/status/1795879796599111997</a> and try to imagine the kind of people who wrote and/or approved that message.</i><p>What exactly is your problem with it? <i>"just look at this"</i> while pointing to a normal tweet doesn't exactly convey a point.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 04:25:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393829</link><dc:creator>ImPostingOnHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393829</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393829</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ImPostingOnHN in "A walking tour of surveillance infrastructure in Seattle (2020)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The property is subject to forfeit (<i>'caveat emptor'</i> in law), but you have to be proven criminal beyond any reasonable doubt.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 19:09:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374760</link><dc:creator>ImPostingOnHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374760</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374760</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ImPostingOnHN in "NPM packages from Red Hat have been compromised"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><i>> You're collapsing two different threat models. The risk isn't that code runs, it's WHEN it runs.</i><p><i>> You don't have to build it, run it, or even import it</i><p>If you just installed something with npm, chances are you'll be running it shortly, either as a tool or a library, probably minutes or seconds later. I imagine the use case of installing an npm package you don't plan on using or transitively importing, constitute a small portion of npm installs.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 14:27:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48357297</link><dc:creator>ImPostingOnHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48357297</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48357297</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ImPostingOnHN in "Malicious npm packages detected across Red Hat Cloud Services"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nearly every package manager I've ever used had post-install scripts. Most run as root, since that's what usually what the package manager runs as.<p>It's not unreasonable: you're already installing software, which presents risks. If post-install scripts were not a thing, a payload could still run because you ran the software you installed. Or because the installer added it to auto-run. Or because the installer placed it somewhere where it would be dynamically loaded all the time.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 14:08:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48357059</link><dc:creator>ImPostingOnHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48357059</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48357059</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ImPostingOnHN in "Cloudflare Turnstile requiring fingerprintable WebGL"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There's not an easy, perfect solution, for sure. Newer phones get faster, but spammer compute gets cheaper.<p>Some sort of decentralized trust web seems like another option, though less viable.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 15:36:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346556</link><dc:creator>ImPostingOnHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346556</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346556</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ImPostingOnHN in "Cloudflare Turnstile requiring fingerprintable WebGL"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't think regulation will stop web scraping, not least of which because it can be done from locations outside the jurisdiction of the regulations.<p><i>> we have to acknowledge the system is broken</i><p>The system is broken. It probably takes, what, 10 seconds or less to use a residential or foreign proxy, 6+ months to internationally track and prosecute a single offender? So like a million times more effort going the regulatory route.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 15:29:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346503</link><dc:creator>ImPostingOnHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346503</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346503</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ImPostingOnHN in "Cloudflare Turnstile requiring fingerprintable WebGL"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The tool "Anubis" uses proof of work instead</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 15:27:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346480</link><dc:creator>ImPostingOnHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346480</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346480</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ImPostingOnHN in "Danish Pension Blacklists SpaceX over 'Catastrophic Governance'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><i>'If you don't agree with me it's because you don't understand'</i> is such a tired, <i>boring</i> trope.<p>Do you have anything to add to that sentiment? Maybe a pro-forma, rather than feelings?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 14:28:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336604</link><dc:creator>ImPostingOnHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336604</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336604</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ImPostingOnHN in "Danish Pension Blacklists SpaceX over 'Catastrophic Governance'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><i>> Let the market decide. Of course they should own one of the largest public companies in the world.</i><p>The pension fund is the customer here. The market is already deciding. You're free to invest your own money as you see fit. The pension fund's money is not yours to decide what to do with.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 14:16:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336454</link><dc:creator>ImPostingOnHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336454</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336454</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ImPostingOnHN in "Danish Pension Blacklists SpaceX over 'Catastrophic Governance'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Judging a pension by how it performs in 2008 seems wrong. Like their main job is to perform well over long periods of time compared to other funds.<p>Checking this shows that 12 years is longer than 1 year, and thus is a better metric.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 14:12:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336401</link><dc:creator>ImPostingOnHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336401</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336401</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ImPostingOnHN in "Danish Pension Blacklists SpaceX over 'Catastrophic Governance'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The pension fund is the user of the stock here.<p>Pensioners should get the same amount regardless of investments, as long as there is enough funding, which it seems there is for the moment.<p>Of course, if someone wants to risk their own money, they can invest in whatever they want. They can even sell their pension for a cash lump sum and invest that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 14:01:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336285</link><dc:creator>ImPostingOnHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336285</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336285</guid></item></channel></rss>