and the changes depend on each other so I can't open multiple independent PRs

  Stacked pull requests break large changes into small, reviewable pull requests. 

  With stacks, you can independently review and check each pull request, then merge everything together in one click.

  No more opening a single large pull request that takes forever to review, or splitting work across multiple branches you have to keep manually rebasing.

It's like responsibility is shifted from the author to the tool. That has been tried before, and every time it seem to consistently produce a similarly shaped mess in a different area of a process, but with an added bonus of the tool's own problems and restrictions.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44434355

  it's basically malicious compliance. They're supposed to be super annoying ... Instead of complying, they choose this obnoxious practice so they could continue ... monitoring every action a visitor does.

  You don't need a cookie banner to be allowed to create Cookies. You only need them if you're using them for something like tracking. [1]

  Regulators didn't enforce cookie banners. Cookie banners are a form of malicious compliance. When you complain about them, you are doing the lobbying work of ad companies for free. The correct solution is to just not spy on people, and the problem is that the EU didn't go far enough and just ban the behavior altogether. [2]

  Cookie pops are malicious compliance to regulations that legitimately protect consumers. You’ve cherry picked one bad side effect to throw out all the ways the EU is way ahead of anyone else in protecting consumers [3]

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38299135

[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46552795

The tone with which it manages to objectify the users and distance the writer from them is a cherry on top.

   Precursor is a client-side, session-based verification system, built with privacy in mind, that uses dynamically injected JavaScript to continuously collect behavioral signals as visitors interact with your application. 

And then I reached:

> 10. AI is fine. Generic language is not.

> It is fine to use AI to draft or review an email.

> But edit it until it sounds specific and human.

Ok, maybe we shouldn't take advice from someone, who authoritatively states it is fine to put slop in the email?

https://old.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/4dmufm/how_tech_writ...

  Dismantling the EU is like burning down your own house 

  The application probably still treats id as unique, but nothing in the schema guarantees it. And you can’t recover the guarantee with a separate UNIQUE (id) constraint: both MySQL and PostgreSQL require every unique constraint on a partitioned table to include the partition key columns. The uniqueness property has effectively been traded away.

MySQL has AUTO_INCREMENT [1]

PostgreSQL has SERIAL [2] and CREATE SEQUENCE [3]

What am I missing?

[1] https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.4/en/example-auto-increme...

[2] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/18/datatype-numeric.html#DAT...

[3] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/18/sql-createsequence.html

It's the scheduling changes that disrupt DST switch (or something else) need adjusting to. But this is usually planned in advance and everyone would (or at least should...) update their tzdata.

The amount of issues you'll have due to those (comparatively rare) changes cannot even begin to compare to the amount issues you'll have with datetime stored in timezones.

What if you didn't and did not proceed with the process? Can you complain still?

As in - if you didn't give your consent there's no violation has occurred and they don't have your data, so nothing to ask for?

This isn't about payment technologies, it's not about isolating transactions, it's about scaling the middle layer. What's worse it's not even explained what middle layer does.

No info on how routing works, no info on data synchronization.

Folks just learning Kubernetes and write extremely abstract stuff.

Those anti-privacy policies will state, that you grant the company and third-parties (so, anyone) permissions to use your data (including voice and image) for any purpose. (Of course, it is stated in a slightly obscure fashion, so a layman may not comprehend it.)

I wonder if there has been any similar action taken against those.

Charles-Joseph de Ligne (who has been part of said journey) regarded such tales as preposterous.

Russian quasi-government structures are spending quadrillion of rubles on a TSPU (censorship system) to spy on Russian residents, US ...helps them by making snooping on what is currently encrypted traffic possible by banning accessible encryption!