<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: IronyMan100</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=IronyMan100</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 08:39:57 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=IronyMan100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by IronyMan100 in "The West Forgot How to Make Things. Now It's Forgetting How to Code"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>IMHO, it's a people Thing. People developed better practices, talked about IT in conferences, maybe left the company. AS a result the knowlegde spread. On the other Hand, If the places where a skilled individual can work and honey their skills, the knowlegde become scarce, the knowlegde cannot spread anymore and it will vanish. If you only program with AI and 5 people do the Work of 100, then you end Up in such a scenario.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 10:00:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47908962</link><dc:creator>IronyMan100</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47908962</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47908962</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by IronyMan100 in "Amazon accused of widespread scheme to inflate prices across the economy"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So If Amazon wante to be the lowest price Destination, but Takes fees for Listings, FBA etc, then the product price needs to include that fees. That will make the product more expensive and since amazon wanted to be the cheapest Destination, the price does need to gonup everywhere?
It's maybe the Fairest Thing, but is it good for the Overall Economy?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 06:31:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47148076</link><dc:creator>IronyMan100</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47148076</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47148076</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by IronyMan100 in "Ask HN: Best way to find chill job where I can learn and grow as a swe"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Work in the Public sector can be exhaustive, since some branches are severly underfinanced, at least in Germany.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 09:34:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46564217</link><dc:creator>IronyMan100</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46564217</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46564217</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by IronyMan100 in "Ask HN: MIT grad, junior dev layoffs – watching my daughter lose faith in merit"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sorry to hear that and that you and your Family could find some peace and strength, i remember a quote which maybe fits Here: you can play a perfect Game and still loose. That's not a weakness, that's life.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2025 15:54:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46421885</link><dc:creator>IronyMan100</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46421885</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46421885</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by IronyMan100 in "AI Withholds Life-or-Death Information Unless You Know the Magic Words"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The funny Thing is, If these LLMs withold this information. What does it withhold else? Can i trust These Corporate LLMs If i Look for information and i am not deemed a Domain expert?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2025 08:44:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46383071</link><dc:creator>IronyMan100</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46383071</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46383071</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by IronyMan100 in "Show HN: Zero-power photonic language model–code"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Normally in this kind of systems, the detection is the nonlinearity.
 That is, you send light through the system, the light can interfere, Changes path through the system but in the end you can detect only the intensities, |E|^2.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 22:04:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46091226</link><dc:creator>IronyMan100</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46091226</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46091226</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by IronyMan100 in "Our babies were taken after 'biased' parenting test"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Can they not go in front of the court? I mean to grow up by their own parents is a child right.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2025 18:13:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46016864</link><dc:creator>IronyMan100</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46016864</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46016864</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by IronyMan100 in "Hilbert space: Treating functions as vectors"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This Has it's use. The continouus Fourier Transform is is based on that. You are asking what frequencies is this continouus signal made of. Time is normally defined as a real number in that context, but If you have a continouus time you need continouus frequencies to map time space to frequency space. You can think about an Index as a lego Block, that you need to construct Something.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 06:49:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46001885</link><dc:creator>IronyMan100</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46001885</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46001885</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by IronyMan100 in "Meta projected 10% of 2024 revenue came from scams"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If i Look at all the finfluences and "get thin in 30h with my cale diet eBook"-influencer, i though it was substantially more than 10%.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 14:12:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45846585</link><dc:creator>IronyMan100</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45846585</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45846585</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by IronyMan100 in "America’s semiconductor boom [video]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think it's N5/N3 or so, current state of the art.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 16:40:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45618802</link><dc:creator>IronyMan100</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45618802</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45618802</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by IronyMan100 in "A small number of samples can poison LLMs of any size"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Does this Not make sense? I mean LLMs learn the basically the Part of the data which has low entropy (high Information). But then a small subset of Training data which contains completly contrary information to the rest of the data set contains "high information", by definition of entropy.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 18:32:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45531358</link><dc:creator>IronyMan100</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45531358</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45531358</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by IronyMan100 in "Towards a Physics Foundation Model"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Some month ago i stumbled upon two arcticles discussing PINNs and their failiures in more complex settings. are there similar challenges?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 11:53:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45288513</link><dc:creator>IronyMan100</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45288513</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45288513</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ask HN: Startup with Small Children]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I am thinking about setting up a startup. I am a scientist and I see increasing commercial interest in my field, as well as some potential problems that could be turned into a startup. However, I have a 1.5-year-old toddler and my wife and I are planning to have another child in the near future. Sometimes I think I want to start something on my own and give my research a useful application. On the other hand, I hear so many founders working 60–80-hour weeks, and that's just not possible right now. Could you tell me about your experience?</p>
<hr>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45265925">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45265925</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 2</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 18:25:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45265925</link><dc:creator>IronyMan100</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45265925</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45265925</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by IronyMan100 in "The rising returns to R&D: Ideas are not getting harder to find"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"These findings suggest that R&D has become more effective at finding productivity-enhancing ideas, but these ideas may also render rivals’ technologies obsolete, making innovations more transient. Because of obsolescence, rising R&D does not necessarily mean rising aggregate productivity growth."<p>I Don't Unserstand that. Innovative should increase productivity. If i deploy a new technology i should see productivity gains. Does that Not mean we see should se productivity gains regardless of how fast a technology becomes obsolete? Maybe technologies do not get adopted that fast or the productivity gains do not justify the Investment?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 13:14:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44951142</link><dc:creator>IronyMan100</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44951142</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44951142</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by IronyMan100 in "Scientific fraud has become an 'industry,' analysis finds"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Honestly, i'm tired of Hearing this. I am a Scientist and i work in science. On HN i feel a breeze of Anti-science sentiments which are only dwarfed by the Anti-Vax Community. I Don't Like my Profession being called a fraud, i also do not call a programmer, a Typewriter Monkies.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 17:19:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44814850</link><dc:creator>IronyMan100</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44814850</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44814850</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by IronyMan100 in "Scientific fraud has become an 'industry,' analysis finds"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There ideas in how to get better. 
-People start talking about pre-register studies, where the study design is evaluated independent of the results.
-Some years ago Nature was thightening the acceptance criteria for articles about new laser principles. 
- in the field of metasurfaces there are more and more articles in how to assess the performance of flat optics and calling Out Problems with the Status quo. 
Honestly, i Don't See your point. Is the progress maybe slow... Yes. But changes are Happening. It's also in the best interest of Academia. You don't want to build Up your career (~5-30 years)on someone else fraudulent.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 10:44:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44810303</link><dc:creator>IronyMan100</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44810303</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44810303</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by IronyMan100 in "Scientific fraud has become an 'industry,' analysis finds"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>i don't think its a good faith argument to compare science with cancer. Do you have numbers? Are you sure 90% is irreproducible? How is cancer similar to whats going on in science?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 08:35:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44809378</link><dc:creator>IronyMan100</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44809378</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44809378</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by IronyMan100 in "Scientific fraud has become an 'industry,' analysis finds"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>you should not trust science. I mean look where the article is published. It's not Vox nor The New York Times, etc. It's in Science, one of the most reputable journals in the world. So the community of scientist is aware of the problem and in the end science is self-correcting. It's just a slow process. Science advances one funreal at a time.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 08:31:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44809335</link><dc:creator>IronyMan100</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44809335</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44809335</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by IronyMan100 in "Scientific fraud has become an 'industry,' analysis finds"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No, probably Not. Nobody is reading these Journals anyway. It's only good one resumes. i think even 3a is Not a problem because fake papers will follow a specific pattern in Meta Analysis. Should be catched in one of the "filter" stages during Meta Analysis.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 20:46:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44804044</link><dc:creator>IronyMan100</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44804044</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44804044</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by IronyMan100 in "The bewildering phenomenon of declining quality"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I had the same impression when buying clothes. I often buy the Shirts Form H&M. I have some old Shirts and the quality IS a Lot better. No loose Threads, the colors did Not wash out for and after washing they stayed how they are. Today all of that is not the Case anymore.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2025 12:04:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44624374</link><dc:creator>IronyMan100</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44624374</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44624374</guid></item></channel></rss>