<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: JJanos</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=JJanos</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 01:41:09 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=JJanos" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by JJanos in "New health insurance “transparency data” looks suspiciously wrong"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think you're far off base here. An X-Ray will never come on more than 2 claims. It only has two parts, an interpretation and a facility fee. You are right it is confusing. It is true that billing context (as part of a grouper/stand alone) needs to a part of the publication of the files. However, that has nothing to do with the author raising valid points of inconsistency that can make the data unusable.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 01:40:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35350951</link><dc:creator>JJanos</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35350951</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35350951</guid></item></channel></rss>