<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: JaggedJax</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=JaggedJax</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 05:36:07 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=JaggedJax" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by JaggedJax in "Zed DeltaDB"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>All I can say is it's the only editor I've ever used with this type of issue and unfortunately it's a deal breaker for me. I can get by with any other editor even if they aren't my favorite, but only Zed made me realize that the most important thing an editor can do for me is accurately show me files.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 21:06:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49188999</link><dc:creator>JaggedJax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49188999</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49188999</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by JaggedJax in "Zed DeltaDB"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I had to stop using Zed because of this issue (which persists despite being closed): <a href="https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/38109" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/38109</a><p>I can't use an editor where the file contents I'm being shown don't match the reality of the file. I guess this issue doesn't affect most people somehow, but in the age of CLI agents I'm not sure how more people aren't running into it.<p>I was really enjoying Zed for a short while before I ran into this fundamental issue.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 20:39:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49188696</link><dc:creator>JaggedJax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49188696</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49188696</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by JaggedJax in "Bitwarden integrates with OneCLI agent vault"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't understand why this would change any opinion on Bitwarden. Bitwarden offers an API and OneCLI calls the Bitwarden API. How does a 3rd party calling Bitwarden's API say anything about Bitwarden?<p>Edit: I can see on Bitwarden's site they also call out their support for OneCLI, so I suppose that looks like Bitwarden saying they approve of and recommend OneCLI. But I see recommending an open source solution as a lot less problematic than recommending any other random private startup solution.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 17:22:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47577132</link><dc:creator>JaggedJax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47577132</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47577132</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by JaggedJax in "Google details new 24-hour process to sideload unverified Android apps"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>How? Reading this it seems like only verified developers can skip this process. Most Fdroid developers won't be verified. I don't see where it says Fdroid would be exempt from this requirement. Would Fdroid be a verified developer?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 04:00:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47450321</link><dc:creator>JaggedJax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47450321</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47450321</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by JaggedJax in "Good Bad ISPs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The turfing with this topic is strong and needs to be called out. Reliable sources are crucial now more than ever. We cannot tolerate and promote botnets once they are uncovered.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 19:54:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47280229</link><dc:creator>JaggedJax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47280229</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47280229</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by JaggedJax in "Good Bad ISPs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I would recommend the Wayback machine archive instead: <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20260306172113/https://community.torproject.org/relay/community-resources/good-bad-isps/" rel="nofollow">https://web.archive.org/web/20260306172113/https://community...</a><p>Given that archive.is is known to DDOS and alter archives (See all the recent HN posts about them)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 17:48:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47278450</link><dc:creator>JaggedJax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47278450</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47278450</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by JaggedJax in "Hackers (1995) Animated Experience"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Found that this is a Firefox setting, maybe it's not (no longer) defaulted to on.<p>"Search for text when you start typing"<p>I have to say, I do like this setting enabled, but can see how it conflicts with the page. And let's be fair, how much time and I saving over having to press Ctrl+F when I want to search a page?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46916486</link><dc:creator>JaggedJax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46916486</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46916486</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by JaggedJax in "Hackers (1995) Animated Experience"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Love it, what a great throwback, especially with the OST.<p>In Firefox is there a way to play this without FF popping up the search box on every key press? Maybe there's a way for the JS to override the default FF search functionality?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 17:02:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46915310</link><dc:creator>JaggedJax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46915310</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46915310</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by JaggedJax in "AI is killing B2B SaaS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Analytical systems. I see a lot of add-on services that will add intelligence/analytics/etc and companies try them out to solve some issue they have and bounce off them frequently due to growing costs. I can only assume as mentioned that over time these are also easier for companies to in-house vibe-code as well, I just haven't seen a ton of that yet, but people are definitely trying which still shrinks the available pie.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 18:21:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46889498</link><dc:creator>JaggedJax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46889498</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46889498</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by JaggedJax in "AI is killing B2B SaaS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Maybe it's mostly from AI, maybe it's mostly general economic cutbacks. I also feel like these "wrapper" style SaaS products are the first ones companies are dropping when they are looking to cut costs, and I think a lot of companies are looking to cut costs. I do agree with the overall conclusion either way, that System of Record products/companies are the most likely to survive. There are a lot of SaaS companies with questionable long-term businesses who are getting hit, but that was bound to happen.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 17:58:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46889156</link><dc:creator>JaggedJax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46889156</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46889156</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by JaggedJax in "Jellyfin LLM/"AI" Development Policy"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm not sure when this policy was introduced, but fairly recently Jellyfin released a pretty major update that introduced a lot of bugs and performance issues. I've been watching their issue tracker as they work through them and have noticed it's flooded with LLM generated PRs and obviously LLM generated PR comments/descriptions/replies. A lot of the LLM generated PRs are a mishmash of 2-8 different issues all jumbled into a single PR.<p>I can see how frustrating it is to wade through those and they are distracting and taking time away from them actually getting things fixed up.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 22:17:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46802375</link><dc:creator>JaggedJax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46802375</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46802375</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by JaggedJax in "Waiting for dawn in search: Search index, Google rulings and impact on Kagi"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They want access to the index. They will perform their own sorting to determine the best results to show from that index.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 19:38:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46710459</link><dc:creator>JaggedJax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46710459</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46710459</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by JaggedJax in "Verizon starts requiring 365 days of paid service before it will unlock phones"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There are plans available where that is the case. So the solution would be to switch plans or carriers to one that doesn't bundle the phone price in.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 04:12:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46701018</link><dc:creator>JaggedJax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46701018</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46701018</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by JaggedJax in "KISS Launcher – fast launcher for Android"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>KISS looks nice and I'll give it a try. This reminds me a lot of Kvaesitso launcher also on F-Droid, although KISS looks a little more minimal. They seem to have a similar focus though. If KISS is a little too bare-bones, but you want something still fairly minimal, I found Kvaesitso to be a good balance.<p>The main purpose of these launchers for me is to avoid using my phone mindlessly. I won't just see an app and open it for no reason. I need to make a decision that I want to use an app on my phone.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 17:01:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46694349</link><dc:creator>JaggedJax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46694349</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46694349</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by JaggedJax in "TP-Link Tapo C200: Hardcoded Keys, Buffer Overflows and Privacy"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's probably fair to assume that most of their other camera models are affected by the same or similar issues. It looks like they pump out quite a few models that I image have similar firmware.<p>This page[1] lists the C200 as last having a firmware update in October, but also lists the latest version as 1.4.4 while the article lists 1.4.2. It seems like they have pushed other updated in this time, but not these security fixes.<p>[1]<a href="https://community.tp-link.com/us/smart-home/kb/detail/412852" rel="nofollow">https://community.tp-link.com/us/smart-home/kb/detail/412852</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 19:28:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46329841</link><dc:creator>JaggedJax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46329841</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46329841</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by JaggedJax in "Amazon imposing fees on using their marketplace API"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've been noticing this happen more lately. Intuit QuickBooks did this exact same thing for GET calls this year as well.<p>My theory is they see POST/PUT calls as adding value and are actions that customer need to perform and help the platform (adding products, inventory, etc). But GET calls they see as leaching off them and not core requirements.<p>The huge gap in this theory are things like Seller Fulfilled orders which you have to GET, but for Amazon they have always pushed hard for Amazon Fulfilled instead.<p>In the end I think this is all mostly to keep things/control in-house as much as possible. Some apps will shut down, others will pass the cost along the sellers. Sellers always lose.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 16:29:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45812794</link><dc:creator>JaggedJax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45812794</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45812794</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by JaggedJax in "Amazon imposing fees on using their marketplace API"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>These are pretty steep API fees for a company already taking a hefty cut on every order flowing through this API.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 23:01:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45805515</link><dc:creator>JaggedJax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45805515</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45805515</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by JaggedJax in "Fallout from the AWS outage: Smart mattresses go rogue"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is one of two things I require when looking at a smart device:<p>1. Must work offline on my local network (like Matter through Home Assistant)<p>2. Must have a physical button for operation when there is no network available or someone doesn't want/have a phone.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2025 18:03:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45659266</link><dc:creator>JaggedJax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45659266</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45659266</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by JaggedJax in "I Test Drove a Flying Car. Get Ready, They're Here"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Corrected link: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wncRFPd69rg&t=1110" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wncRFPd69rg&t=1110</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 16:44:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45618845</link><dc:creator>JaggedJax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45618845</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45618845</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by JaggedJax in "I’ve removed Disqus. It was making my blog worse"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I ended up going this route too and really like it. There are lots of guides out there with different solutions, all really easy to implement.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 16:29:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45427616</link><dc:creator>JaggedJax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45427616</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45427616</guid></item></channel></rss>