(Also, people using it as a fake number for some appointment/reservation - which I sometimes update to change their name or add a special request :))

This is a CLI primarily designed for your Claw to search for available tennis courts and book them without slow browser automation (if you're in San Francisco or another area powered by rec.us).

Perhaps the most interesting part is the API documentation that was entirely written by Claude Code by reverse engineering the frontend and trying stuff, with minimal steering:

https://jakajancar.github.io/recus/api.html

To be honest, now that the docs are done, I'm not sure the CLI even adds value, as the Claw (if given the API docs) can curl its way around pretty efficiently and handles unforeseen situations much better.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47255852

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

https://procrastinate.readthedocs.io/en/stable/index.html

Core is not Django-specific, but it has an optional integration. Sync and async, retries/cancellation/etc., very extensible, and IMO super clean architecture and well tested.

IIRC think the codebase is like one-tenth that of Celery.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46050568

Points: 2

# Comments: 1

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45970231

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45960293

Points: 314

# Comments: 78

I didn't know about CA/Browser forum and the Baseline Requirements. Thanks, will check it out!

// Edit: Relevant section:

The Subscriber Agreement or Terms of Use MUST contain provisions imposing on the Applicant [..] the following obligations and warranties:

[...]

Protection of Private Key: An obligation and warranty by the Applicant to take all reasonable measures to assure control of, keep confidential, and properly protect at all times the Private Key [...]

  - register myproject.dev,
  - point it to 127.0.0.1,
  - create a cert for it, and
  - just store the private key in the repo.

There are projects like https://lcl.host, but they require installing stuff on the machine and/or modifying the browser trust configuration.

Why has nobody just registered a similar domain like lcl.host, pointed it to 127.0.0.1, and published the private key for everyone to use?

Would the CA revoke this cert? Why? Doesn't the domain owner get to define the set of servers they allow to use the cert, and if that set just happens to be everyone, so what?

Is this "there are limits to how wide you can distribute your private key" policy documented somewhere?

Looking at digicert[1], if a revocation request is submitted, the owner must approve it. What happens if I just don't approve it?

[1]: https://docs.digicert.com/en/certcentral/manage-certificates/revoke-an-issued-ssl-tls-certificate/approve--or-reject--a-certificate-revocation-request.html

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41642226

Points: 3

# Comments: 6

I always liked Balsamiq, it really forces you not to obsess about the pixels too much, but it was so slow/bloated/buggy, like something from the Java on desktop era. This is much smoother!