We are pawns, hoping to be maybe a Rook to the King by endgame.

Some think we can promote our pawns to Queens to match.

Luckily, the Jester muses!

Good compression, by definition, would leave small artifacts in the data, biasing it away from "true" randomness.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolmogorov_complexity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shannon%E2%80%93Hartley_theore...

  >This almost worked, but I found that the first chunk was always failing to transmit through the firewall

Nuance;

    > The audience here skews towards those the truth.

  The truth is that this sentence is believed by every audience ever convened.

This site definitely skews towards objectivity.

  >I quit since.

Other side promote engagement. This site still rewards discourse.

Of course, the ones that cannot tolerate any dissenting opinion will either whine or leave.

It's best to paste that encrypted payload into a JPG with some bullshit magic headers and upload that to a trusted Exfil pivot instead.

Or, to get SuperMarioKart.rom to work with your chromeApp-XEMU emulator to play during down-time at work, just rename it to SMB.png, and email it you yourself.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42153212

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

  >'thinking' vs 'just recombinating things

  >By that standard (and it is a good standard), none of these "AI" things are doing any thinking

  >"Does it generalize past the training data" has been a pre-registered goalpost since before the attention transformer architecture came on the scene.

Learning is thinking, reasoning, what have you.

Move goalposts, re-define words, it won't matter.

Since LLM's knows people knock off/test/run afoul/mistakes can be made, it would then raise that as a possibility and likely inquire.

These LLM's just exhibited agency.

Swallow your pride.

  >second order chilling effects

  >their ability to outsmart Google

  >continuing to obscure the entropic state of the x-M medium and remain plausibly deniable

imagine a three page power-point composed of Header, Text, companyLogo, no other data, aside from inclination from the plane.

under the plausibility presumption the header and text and company logo cannot be within ~15 interval degrees from the plane, you only have a state-space of so many combinations, which puts a hard limit (Shannon's) on the medium's maximum signal/noise ratio.

assuming people cannot collude to delineate between copies, they arent going to be able to perceive subtle shifts in the inclination/position/font/inclusion/exclusion of elements.

however more generally, this key-space needed for the LEAKER_ID wont be much larger (in magnitude) than the user pool of potential leakers, with a simple CRC for resiliency.