After playing around with several options, piezoelectric was the path I chose for a sub-micron stage. It took a bit of research, but it does make things much easier when done right.

Most hobby work is kept private now... due to safety issues with people without lab-training attempting complex builds. Indeed, a few fools still die every year attempting things they saw on you-tube ("Lichtenstein burning" etc.) =3

The stage is not the primary design constraint, but rather it is the position sensors that still cost. At a certain point, some realize the pi-usa stages lofty price was actually fairly reasonable in retrospect.

Best regards, =3

There are also easier options if you spend some time with a specific use case. =3

However, the upfront cost of Full-sized Fission power facilities are often still around 1/2 to 1/3 the end user $/kWh. The issues arise with the long term waste stewardship costs, and the cognitive disconnect people can engineer their way out of the liabilities.

Now that "AI" data-centers are acting like a public infrastructure equity siphon, in some places private solar can have a payback period measured in under a few years. =3

https://www.phoenixframework.org/

https://phoenix.hexdocs.pm/channels.html

Depends what you do, and if your organization has a persistent clown infestation. Some big business folks still use email as a human to API interface.

Running out-of-band public keychains is not something most people will ever need. =3

Thus, participants are pooled under 1 time constrained key exchange, participants sections origins are signed/time-stamped, and the ciphertext expires on a schedule.

Why? so at some future time side-channel key exfiltration can't be used to data mine the entire history of past tapped conversations/ciphertext. Even if a private signing key is stolen, it is difficult to rebuild the lost ephemeral key session.

Have a nice day. =3

Also, don't gamble with your health, take a few minutes to talk with your doctor if you don't understand what is happening.

Have a glorious day =3

Packagers do try to coordinate distro release cycle mess, but ultimately long term support for complex programs is tied to the OS version constellation in upstream builds. Thus, the users are going to experience the Beta stage of that code... even though people often assume a polished release-candidate isn't just a euphemism for public Beta.

Thus, the assets needed to maintain a projects function are likely to stop working within 3 years or less. Indeed, some parts of the ecosystem are worse than others.

Low attention code creates 2 paradoxes:

1. new versions may not be supported on newer OS releases due to API mutation, and old dependency injection

2. versions may not be back-ported due to old releases missing API features, and new dependencies

I think it is hilarious people make up silly stories like it is not a fundamental constraint/liability in FOSS. The situation is not anecdotal, and reaches deep into the kernel driver areas. This is why we can't have nice things, as a billion conflicting use-cases is just a chaotic ecosystem. =3

The hard truth is OSS is often chaotic as there is no authority saying a given API is "good-enough" to version freeze, and it limits how much individuals can integrate without upstream source-tree contiguous-integration at the mercy of 150k devs whims. =3

scriptPath=$(/usr/bin/realpath "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")

localPath=$(/usr/bin/dirname "$scriptPath" )

/usr/bin/echo "localPath = '$localPath'"

It is under 5 minutes to write a shell/bat/make/cmake script for each platform to configure library requirements, import OS specific data, and enable GPU/NPU features. Then run through the application build, installation package with stripped performance build, and or a few regression tests.

Lets say you have 4k downloads a month on a small project, and it takes 1 hour for each admin to read/configure. You just saved about 5 years of your users lives reading your document. =3

This guy publishes simple tutorials on how to deal with the unintuitive FreeCAD parametric design workflow:

https://www.youtube.com/@4axisprinting/videos

If you have a long-term project... storing the exact FreeCAD version installer in the artifacts folder for precise compatibility is wise. =3

https://docs.gtk.org/glib/data-structures.html#doubly-linked...

GSL GNU Scientific Library for C:

https://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/doc/html/intro.html

In general, no one should be custom building most basic structures in C these days. =3

Technically, it is home users volunteering data to a cloud provider, that then mines the disclosed data as a service for any creep.

It would be a constitutional matter, and the city would lose in court given precedent lawsuits... if police used direct surveillance to follow people around even on public property where there was no expectation of privacy. Sue, and remember to vote. =3