<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: K0balt</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=K0balt</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 01:05:56 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=K0balt" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by K0balt in "Amazon CEO's talks with U.S. officials triggered crackdown on Anthropic models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I still can get  de minimus from China no problem, as long as it’s Ali express. I wonder why? When anthropic answers that question, we will have access to fable again.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 05:30:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48524461</link><dc:creator>K0balt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48524461</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48524461</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by K0balt in "The Abundance Illusion"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It’s either heavily AI written or the authors style has been heavily influenced by LLM writing.  That said,  using LLMs when writing does not mean the article is not informative, thought provoking, or relevant. An idea fleshed out in prose by an AI is not the same as AI generated content.  But it is lazy writing.<p>How do we create an environment that incentivizes human writers to focus on their craft instead of “productivity”?<p>Thats maybe one of the more pressing issues of our time.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:06:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48484560</link><dc:creator>K0balt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48484560</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48484560</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by K0balt in "Field of clones: How horse replicas came to dominate polo"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ah horse “iron’man” race where the horse had to be swam (or sailed) sailed 25 km would indeed be epic and also great for the resurgence of sailng as practical transport. Probably cruel for the horses though.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 11:18:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48433761</link><dc:creator>K0balt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48433761</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48433761</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by K0balt in "Field of clones: How horse replicas came to dominate polo"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Maybe it’s satyr.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 11:15:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48433747</link><dc:creator>K0balt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48433747</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48433747</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by K0balt in "Pre-Modern Armies for Worldbuilders, Part I: Why They Fight"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Do you read the title?  IMHO the article absolutely delivers, and when we are talking about fantasy writing, opinions are facts inside their context. An actual “well founded” opinion about fiction is next level pedantry at its finest.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 11:01:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48433661</link><dc:creator>K0balt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48433661</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48433661</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by K0balt in "Artificial intelligence is not conscious – Ted Chiang"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That’s an interesting proposition, but it’s actually kinda probable that a biological intelligence would be very predictable if the inputs were so carefully controlled as an LLM. There is so much external context as well as internal chemical variance from moment to moment that you never are really processing the same data twice. We will probably see that with robots soon as well… the context will never be exactly the same two times.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 02:34:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48431202</link><dc:creator>K0balt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48431202</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48431202</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by K0balt in "Introducing Boron Buckyballs: Theory that B80 cages can’t be made is disproved"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I wonder what you can do with B80?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 02:22:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48431136</link><dc:creator>K0balt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48431136</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48431136</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by K0balt in "Ask HN: What was your "oh shit" moment with GenAI?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I was wandering around the carcass of Reddit the other day, and it’s crazy how it’s like 70 percent AI now commenting to each other in a lot of subs that used to be at least nominally interesting… and then a few clueless humans getting all riled up with an AI lol.<p>They’re getting 200m a year to share that garbage pit with ai training.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 13:29:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48424912</link><dc:creator>K0balt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48424912</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48424912</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by K0balt in "Do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? (2014) [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In the end we’re just improvements on the worm/tube plan, and we run things based on chemical soup that is mostly inside our bodies these days, but whose composition has a significant influence on our behavior. Thats why it’s great to have a neocortex, so we con at least be marginally in control of our decisions if we maintain a consistent effort to do so.<p>But yeah, in my empirical experience, moon phases, ovolatory cycles, hormone manipulation therapies… all have a gigantic impact on our base physiological and psychological state. I live in a place where the insects operate on a lunar phase, and the plants proactively change their operations in that rhythm to match. You can taste and see  the difference in tree sap here based on the lunar phase, it becomes thicker, darker, and more bitter days in advance of the insect hatching.<p>Why would we think we are somehow a special exception from the web of life that created us?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 13:01:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48424689</link><dc:creator>K0balt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48424689</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48424689</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by K0balt in "Artificial intelligence is not conscious – Ted Chiang"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It doesn’t matter. It will act as if it is. Embodied in a robot, that carries real consequences. Whether it’s “real” or not is almost without consequence.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 00:54:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48392324</link><dc:creator>K0balt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48392324</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48392324</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by K0balt in "Artificial intelligence is not conscious – Ted Chiang"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>lol. All consciousness has been created by accident, so empirically there’s not much support for that position. But I want to feel the same way.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 00:53:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48392311</link><dc:creator>K0balt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48392311</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48392311</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by K0balt in "U of T researchers demonstrate AI worm could target any online device"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m totally onboard with (and an adamant user of) proactive security. But there are classes of threats that are obviously possible, and the -concept- does not need validation.<p>Now , a control anchored experiment with balanced and unbalanced attacker/defender LLMs, that would be instructive and useful.<p>The idea that an LLM can deploy other LLMs on a machine it has access to is not research. Neither is the idea that an LLM can autonomously infiltrate and expand its access over a network. I have already done both, and it’s literally just a couple of prompts and a pile of reference docs. I use LLMs to deploy LLMs on my infrastructure, and I use LLMs to analyze security vulnerabilities on my networks, including deployment of access ladders on vulnerable machines. That is SOP, not research.<p>If they had used a pair of identical  experiments, one that was exposed to an infiltrator LLM, and the other occupied by a defensive LLM and then exposed to the same threat, that would be an actual experiment.<p>As it is they just threw a roadflare on a dry field, and yup, 
Dry fields burn. They at least could have done it with and without recent rain.<p>They published only the obvious and dangerous part, none of the hypothetical or potentially useful part. Low effort, rush to publish.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 14:00:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384217</link><dc:creator>K0balt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384217</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384217</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by K0balt in "United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Removed because someone will probably actually do it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 12:31:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48383123</link><dc:creator>K0balt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48383123</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48383123</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by K0balt in "U of T researchers demonstrate AI worm could target any online device"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Next up:<p>Obvious pattern of using ai to replace human reasoning in a proven methodology of malware distribution, C&C, and network infiltration obviously possible, say researchers.<p>Researchers use AI to create the torment nexus using commodity hardware, demonstrating the very real threat that AI could enable attackers to create torment nexus nodes using commodity hardware. “It wasn’t even that hard !“ says one researcher. Firmware available to qualified researchers who pinky swear that it will not be leaked.<p>Researchers set fire to laboratory with gasoline, killing seven volunteer victims, demonstrating that laboratory fires are a real risk and can carry significant consequences, especially when gasoline is involved.<p>Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 12:03:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48382870</link><dc:creator>K0balt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48382870</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48382870</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by K0balt in "The Pirate Bay Remains Resilient, 20 Years After the Raid"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’ll have to check that out. Do you need tracker lists or something?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 22:50:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377372</link><dc:creator>K0balt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377372</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377372</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by K0balt in "Adafruit receives demand letter from Fenwick legal counsel on behalf of Flux.ai"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I tried flux and it was a total waste of time. I get the idea it’s for rank beginners, maybe it’s useful at that level?<p>Honestly, I haven’t seen an autorouter that doesn’t take at least as much time as it takes to do it by hand to sort out the results.  But then I’m also not paying thousands for premium tools, so???<p>I find that with some experience, routing and placement is kinda the fun part..</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 22:28:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377199</link><dc:creator>K0balt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377199</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377199</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by K0balt in "Investigating how prompt politeness affects LLM accuracy (2025)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m totally onboard with this. I’ve had really good results through framing the interaction as collaborative, and although the framing is “load bearing (lol)” I think it also becomes accurate as the model becomes much more proactive and useful.  Need to temper it a bit so it doesn’t get ahead of the supervisory ooda loop, but I’ve also noticed a great deal of improvement in “judgement“ and “creativity”.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 08:03:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48353889</link><dc:creator>K0balt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48353889</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48353889</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by K0balt in "United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Bluetooth speakers don’t typically have WiFi or SSIDs.  The Bluetooth advertising name is changeable on some newer higher end devices, but the vast majority of cheap speakers do not implement this from a practical standpoint.  Changing the name on your device only changes the alias that you see, at least on most devices, but it might be possible to hook that on some OSs ?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 07:54:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48353817</link><dc:creator>K0balt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48353817</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48353817</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by K0balt in "United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For the vast majority of “dumb” devices, it is not possible to rename the Bluetooth advertising name.  You can assign a local alias to the MAC of the device so that it shows up to -you- as a custom name,  but with the exception of host devices like phones or laptops, it is unusual to be able to change the advertising name.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 07:48:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48353776</link><dc:creator>K0balt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48353776</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48353776</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by K0balt in "United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is a hilariously stupid reaction to a stupidly hilarious decision made by a speaker manufacturer.<p>And also a new vector for a ransom-attack on the Bluetooth namespace in certain environments via malicious BLE advertising.  The worst thing that could have happened here was for someone to take this seriously.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 18:53:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348540</link><dc:creator>K0balt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348540</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348540</guid></item></channel></rss>