That rather sounds like a bug to me.

I'd try browser automation to get the book pages, then OCR it (or just store them as images).

China: 11.7% of H-1B approvals

All other nationalities: 17.3% combined

Src: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/9/22/h-1b-fee-hike-whos-...

1. Only a handful of devs use LLMs

2. For every developer getting less productive with LLMs, there must be developers that get more productive to keep the trend

Yikes. AntiVirus scanners for website access.

Key reasons include:

- *Fashion Prioritizes Silhouette:* Designers often avoid adding pockets to women’s clothes to maintain a "feminine" shape, as filled pockets might alter the line or appearance of garments[1][3][5].

- *Historical Gender Roles:* From the 17th century onwards, pockets became standard in men’s clothing while women’s garments often lacked them. Designers assumed women, not seen as independent or responsible for carrying items, did not need pockets—especially as men traditionally carried money and keys[2][4][5].

- *Social Control:* There is evidence that during periods like the French Revolution, women were banned from having pockets to limit their ability to carry or conceal items, reflecting broader efforts to control women’s independence and mobility[5][6].

- *Economics & The Purse Industry:* Some believe that limiting pockets in women’s clothes pushes women to buy handbags and purses, sustaining a large accessories market. There are claims that brands make more money from selling handbags than pockets—a practice dating back decades[5].

- *Cost Cutting:* Adding functional pockets can increase materials and production time, and some brands justify smaller or fake pockets as a way to save money, although this is only one part of the issue[5].

- *Persistence of Tradition:* Despite some progress, women’s pockets remain smaller and less functional than men’s, which many experts attribute to outdated design habits and persistent gendered thinking in fashion[4][5].

Ultimately, the lack of pockets in women’s clothing reflects deep-seated ideas about gender, utility, and aesthetics that have persisted for centuries and continue to affect clothing design today[1][2][5][6].

Citations: [1] Why Don't Women's Clothes Have More Pockets? https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/06/style/pockets-womens-clot... [2] In the pocket of the patriarchy: History behind the absence of ... https://badgerherald.com/artsetc/2022/09/25/in-the-pocket-of... [3] ELI5: Why don't women's pants have functional pockets? - Reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/42bhej/e... [4] Why Most Women's Clothes Don't Have Real Pockets | HowStuffWorks https://lifestyle.howstuffworks.com/style/fashion/trends-loo... [5] The Real Reason Why Women's Clothes Don't Have Pockets https://fashionmagazine.com/style/womens-pockets/ [6] Pockets and the Patriarchy, How Fashion Has Reinforced Gender ... https://foragedesign.com/blogs/blog/pockets-and-the-patriarc... [7] why women's pockets are useless - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jA_elEw-Oog [8] Pocket Patriarchy - Sartorial Magazine https://sartorialmagazine.com/fashion-1/2023/11/22/pocket-pa...

    To bypass detection, a crawler would need to mimic not just the user agent, but also the full set of browser behaviors, headers, and environmental fingerprints—a much more complex task that Cloudflare’s systems are designed to counter.

In this case the US is treating them with batons and rubber bullets.

  ssh username@server "sqlite3 my_remote_database.db .dump | gzip -c" | gunzip -c | sqlite3 my_local_database.db