<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: KKPMW</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=KKPMW</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 03:20:30 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=KKPMW" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by KKPMW in "AlphaFold: a solution to a 50-year-old grand challenge in biology"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is exactly right. It's like saying you solved chess because for each configuration of pieces on the board you can use machine learning to predict whether that position can be achieved with valid chess moves. With 90% accuracy.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:29:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25257141</link><dc:creator>KKPMW</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25257141</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25257141</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by KKPMW in "Ask HN: What is the best edit/delete setup for Internet forum content?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Editing should be allowed for an hour or so in order to fix spelling mistakes, reformat text for easier flow, or even as a recovery after pressing "post" by accident. But long-term deleting and editing will hurt the content. This, for example, is visible on reddit where older threads sometimes have these big piles of deleted comments. Instead maybe I would try something new:<p>1) Ability to post anonymous comments
2) Instead of deleting a comment a user can choose to make it anonymous so that it is no longer associated with his/her account</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2020 17:04:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25238726</link><dc:creator>KKPMW</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25238726</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25238726</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by KKPMW in "Show HN: The NoJS Club"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>These clubs are a bit superficial. I wish there was one with requirements concentrated on user experience rather than technical details.<p>Maybe "no tracking + no ads + no low-effort content + no clickbait + no paid content" club.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 19:09:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25222753</link><dc:creator>KKPMW</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25222753</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25222753</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by KKPMW in "Herding Cats and Free Will Inflation (2020) [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>To me it seems like you can have a state of mind, and use that state to predict the state of mind of others without being _aware_ of your state of mind at the same time - that is, without being conscious.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:10:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25221772</link><dc:creator>KKPMW</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25221772</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25221772</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by KKPMW in "Herding Cats and Free Will Inflation (2020) [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I fail to see why that would be true. I think there are different definitions of consciousness here that are being mixed up.<p>> Without consciousness you experience a single unified reality: your reality.<p>To me the word "experience" is what consciousness seems to be about. In that case without consciousness you can "step outside" and everything, but you would have no "internal experience" of any sort. i.e. be a "philosophical zombie" [1].<p>[1] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_zombie" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_zombie</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 16:59:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25221657</link><dc:creator>KKPMW</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25221657</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25221657</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by KKPMW in "Herding Cats and Free Will Inflation (2020) [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> the claim that consciousness evolved in order to predict other agent’s behavior<p>I fail to see why consciousness would be necessary for prediction. Any more context here?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 16:43:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25221451</link><dc:creator>KKPMW</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25221451</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25221451</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Content, Creativity, and Monetisation in the Modern Internet]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.gtf.io/musings/content-creativity-monetisation/">https://www.gtf.io/musings/content-creativity-monetisation/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25181320">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25181320</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2020 21:34:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.gtf.io/musings/content-creativity-monetisation/</link><dc:creator>KKPMW</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25181320</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25181320</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by KKPMW in "What's Missing from CSS?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://whatsmissingfromcss.com/data/comments.json" rel="nofollow">https://whatsmissingfromcss.com/data/comments.json</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2020 21:13:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25172816</link><dc:creator>KKPMW</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25172816</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25172816</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by KKPMW in "Interpretation of confidence intervals and Bayesian credible intervals"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sorry, I don't see how this reply is related to the original objection that frequentist methods are not applicable to events that happen once.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2020 17:23:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25171029</link><dc:creator>KKPMW</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25171029</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25171029</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by KKPMW in "Interpretation of confidence intervals and Bayesian credible intervals"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There are a few things intermingled in this election example.<p>1. The outcome of the election here is not a probability. It is the population value - the ratio of people voting for candidate X on the election date. It doesn't have to be repeated in the same way measurements of height for all people in United States would not have to be repeated, if instead of vote we were measuring heights.<p>2. Frequentist probability doesn't require to physically repeat things. It can reason about what would happen in the repeated sampling under certain conditions, and then draw inferences about those assumed conditions. With the election example: if you get a survey of 100 people with 70% voting for candidate "A" we don't need to repeat this survey in order to know the likelihood (frequency) of this result happening if the real proportion of people voting for candidate "A" across the US is 50%.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2020 15:43:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25170268</link><dc:creator>KKPMW</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25170268</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25170268</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by KKPMW in "Metatrends shaping the next decade"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> 18. High-resolution VR will transform both retail and real estate shopping<p>To me - this one sounds most plausible.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2020 17:57:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25085236</link><dc:creator>KKPMW</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25085236</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25085236</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by KKPMW in "Why are so many coders still using Vim and Emacs?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Modern IDEs are magic. Why are so many coders still using Vim and Emacs?<p>The title answers the question to some extent - I prefer Vim over IDEs because I am allergic to "auto-magic". Also, unlike most IDEs, Vim will still be there after 5 years, 10 years, or 15 years.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 19:30:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25038775</link><dc:creator>KKPMW</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25038775</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25038775</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ascetic Bullet Journal]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="http://karolis.koncevicius.lt/posts/ascetic_bullet_journal/">http://karolis.koncevicius.lt/posts/ascetic_bullet_journal/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25034213">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25034213</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 12:52:49 +0000</pubDate><link>http://karolis.koncevicius.lt/posts/ascetic_bullet_journal/</link><dc:creator>KKPMW</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25034213</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25034213</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by KKPMW in "Ask HN: What's up with these Google search results?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>One possible explanation would be to think what kind of pictures or photos would get labels with words "white woman" in them. If it was a single woman smiling it would probably be labelled "happy woman" or just "happiness". The word "white" is likely to appear when there are other people of different colors in the same picture. For example "Afro man and white woman happy at a pool" or something like that.<p>Same with European art. The prefix "European" would only be added when the author of the picture tries to contrast it with something else, or push some agenda about "European art". Otherwise it would just be under "art".<p>Case in point with another term: look at "American scientists" and "white American scientist". The second one will have more results of black people. This is again, in my opinion, because the addition of "white" is mainly added by those who concentrate and write about things related to  race.<p>Another case in point - try looking for "thin woman" and observe how the proportion of pictures with obesity in them is bigger compared to searching for "woman" only.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 11:47:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25025114</link><dc:creator>KKPMW</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25025114</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25025114</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Life on the Command Line (2011)]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20170826033741/http://stephenramsay.us/2011/04/09/life-on-the-command-line">https://web.archive.org/web/20170826033741/http://stephenramsay.us/2011/04/09/life-on-the-command-line</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24999606">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24999606</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 16:36:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://web.archive.org/web/20170826033741/http://stephenramsay.us/2011/04/09/life-on-the-command-line</link><dc:creator>KKPMW</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24999606</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24999606</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by KKPMW in "Non US Election Zone?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. Videos of pratfalls or disasters, or cute animal pictures. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic.[0]<p>[0]: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html" rel="nofollow">https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2020 17:08:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24990858</link><dc:creator>KKPMW</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24990858</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24990858</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by KKPMW in "We just found a source for one of the most mysterious phenomena in astronomy"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Anti-clickbait:<p>> magnetars (highly magnetized neutron stars) are one possible source of the mysterious "fast radio burst" signals</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2020 16:28:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24990446</link><dc:creator>KKPMW</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24990446</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24990446</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by KKPMW in "Doubts over a ‘possible sign of life’ on Venus"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> But it's a particular research programme, embedded in a social context, that generates knowledge, not a single reproducible experiment.<p>Somewhat disagree. That particular research programme must still have reproducible experiment as a unit. A million irreproducible experiments will generate exactly zero knowledge.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 21:39:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24984307</link><dc:creator>KKPMW</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24984307</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24984307</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by KKPMW in "If Sapiens were a blog post"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Cool. Few times I thought about doing something like this (not for sapiens) my self. But always stopped to wonder how legal it would be.<p>Maybe someone here has an idea about possible copyright issues?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 13:42:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24979551</link><dc:creator>KKPMW</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24979551</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24979551</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Improving GitHub Issue Labels]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="http://karolis.koncevicius.lt/posts/improving_github_issue_labels/">http://karolis.koncevicius.lt/posts/improving_github_issue_labels/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24979506">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24979506</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 13:37:20 +0000</pubDate><link>http://karolis.koncevicius.lt/posts/improving_github_issue_labels/</link><dc:creator>KKPMW</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24979506</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24979506</guid></item></channel></rss>