<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: Kotlopou</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=Kotlopou</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 02:06:36 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=Kotlopou" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Kotlopou in "The Aperiodic Table"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm sorry, but... <i>this</i> is why I'm unhappy about AI-generated projects.<p>The parent post asked a more-or-less specific question about how this works and offered their working hypothesis (that it works by taking the rectangular periodic table and mapping each element to its nearest Penrose tile). I would also be curious about this, because e.g. it seems non-obvious to me that the resulting table would have no holes inside. Does there have to be any extra step to ensure that?<p>But your reply is not informative at all. If you wrote this yourself from scratch, you would be able to answer this kind of question (and report on anything interesting that came up while creating the program), but this way the post just hangs here to be forgotten, and I haven't learned a new thing about Penrose tilings. :(</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 22:16:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48186534</link><dc:creator>Kotlopou</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48186534</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48186534</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Kotlopou in "Show HN: I built a tool that watches webpages and exposes changes as RSS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I use RSS to get updates from a ll the stuff I read online at once, and thought this would be nice for those websites that don't already have an RSS feed, but... Perhaps I'm stupid, but I can't actually find the RSS output? And searching for RSS on <a href="https://docs.sitespy.app/docs" rel="nofollow">https://docs.sitespy.app/docs</a> returns no hits.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 11:31:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47349204</link><dc:creator>Kotlopou</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47349204</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47349204</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Kotlopou in "Qt45: A small polymerase ribozyme that can synthesize itself"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Actually, the search here is chemical -- you make a bunch of random small RNA sequences, then chemically replicate those that do what you want, and after a few cycles of this you find just a few sequences dominating the population. The pools can easily reach 10^14 examples and more, because you don't need a separate container/experiment for each one, but do it all together in one batch.  The keyword is SELEX, a pretty cool idea: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systematic_evolution_of_ligands_by_exponential_enrichment" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systematic_evolution_of_ligand...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 12:15:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47194352</link><dc:creator>Kotlopou</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47194352</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47194352</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Things to change if the apocalypse comes]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://beatingthehydra.substack.com/p/short-post-things-to-change-if-the">https://beatingthehydra.substack.com/p/short-post-things-to-change-if-the</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46989126">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46989126</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 14:17:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://beatingthehydra.substack.com/p/short-post-things-to-change-if-the</link><dc:creator>Kotlopou</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46989126</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46989126</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[One Funeral at a Time]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.md-a.co/p/one-funeral-at-a-time">https://www.md-a.co/p/one-funeral-at-a-time</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46983583">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46983583</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 01:03:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.md-a.co/p/one-funeral-at-a-time</link><dc:creator>Kotlopou</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46983583</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46983583</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Kotlopou in "What GLP-1s Are Accidentally Teaching Us About Our Brains"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The percentage of users quoted seems insane: are 10-20% of Americans really on GLP-1??<p>I found this source: <a href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA4153-1.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA4153-1.html</a><p>The numbers across age categories do not correspond to the ones in TFA, but they're <i>also</i> insane, and around 10% average. Combined with 20% vomiting side effects, that would suggest 2% of Americans have been throwing up, which sounds... implausible? Can an American say whether this matches what they're seeing/hearing in their social circles?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 17:13:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46873804</link><dc:creator>Kotlopou</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46873804</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46873804</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Kotlopou in "Why can nobody build an algorithm that works like a worm?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Original title is <i>The biggest mystery in neuroscience, according to me</i>. Since the <i>me</i> is not me but computational neuroscientist Chenchen Li, I changed the title to the mystery itself.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 21:34:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46861923</link><dc:creator>Kotlopou</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46861923</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46861923</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why can nobody build an algorithm that works like a worm?]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://ccli.substack.com/p/the-biggest-mystery-in-neuroscience">https://ccli.substack.com/p/the-biggest-mystery-in-neuroscience</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46861922">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46861922</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 2</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 21:34:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://ccli.substack.com/p/the-biggest-mystery-in-neuroscience</link><dc:creator>Kotlopou</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46861922</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46861922</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Kotlopou in "The History of Light"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Disclosure: I am the author of this piece. Happy to answer questions!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 19:16:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46723832</link><dc:creator>Kotlopou</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46723832</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46723832</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[The History of Light]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://beatingthehydra.substack.com/p/the-history-of-light">https://beatingthehydra.substack.com/p/the-history-of-light</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46723831">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46723831</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 19:16:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://beatingthehydra.substack.com/p/the-history-of-light</link><dc:creator>Kotlopou</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46723831</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46723831</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Claude Shannon's randomness-guessing machine]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.loper-os.org/bad-at-entropy/manmach.html">https://www.loper-os.org/bad-at-entropy/manmach.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46588660">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46588660</a></p>
<p>Points: 36</p>
<p># Comments: 12</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 14:03:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.loper-os.org/bad-at-entropy/manmach.html</link><dc:creator>Kotlopou</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46588660</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46588660</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[George Gabriel Stokes in love (1857)]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://skullsinthestars.com/2013/06/04/george-gabriel-stokes-in-love-1857/">https://skullsinthestars.com/2013/06/04/george-gabriel-stokes-in-love-1857/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46575283">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46575283</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2026 12:45:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://skullsinthestars.com/2013/06/04/george-gabriel-stokes-in-love-1857/</link><dc:creator>Kotlopou</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46575283</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46575283</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Kotlopou in "Peano arithmetic is enough, because Peano arithmetic  encodes computation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Asker of the SO question here: I edited the question to link to a few other answers on this kind of thing. Essentially, "PA is consistent" is not enough, but a "uniform reflection principle" that says "if PA proves something, it's true" is enough. I'm not 100% certain that this principle is equivalent to omega-consistency, but if I'm reading this correctly, it should be:<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%A9-consistent_theory#Relation_to_other_consistency_principles" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%A9-consistent_theory#Relat...</a><p>The Wikipedia article says T is omega-consistent if "T + RFN_T + the set of all true sentences is consistent", which should mean the same thing as "T + RFN_T is true".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2025 18:24:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44277865</link><dc:creator>Kotlopou</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44277865</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44277865</guid></item></channel></rss>