It used to be an admin would just kick them. Now we don't get to be in control of our own games.

I suspect what isn't being said by the lawyers is they want to keep attorney client privilege so they can outright lie.

I would add that their is no guarantee their are correct as well.

Insert credit card and two forms of id to log on...

Anyone they are responsible for could be forced off social media, etc...

This is just another case of some people deciding other people are too dumb to handle themselves or their kids. Further, I believe formally blaming the media companies lets everyone off the hook for their own actions.

In the general sense, Congress shouldn't be exempting itself from federal smoking bans, providing healthcare coverage, insider trading, lying before Congress, etc...

In general, if someone comes along and says that someone else's rights should be shrunk, I think they should give up those same rights first.

You can just look at the US congress for how this isn't done as they frequently carve out exceptions for themselves and staffers.

My family had multiple (various) machines in an arcade and we kept this at home for some time. I often think of this specific example piece of hardware versus everything plastic today.

This link, for example, "first glimpse of far side...[video]", is a video of the crew inside the craft. yawn It seems like every article I've read is like this. Like they're trying to encourage conspiracy theories.

We're talking about the unseen, far side of the moon, and they can't scrape together at least a still image of it?

The launch was in lower resolution than many shuttle launches I've watched.

Looking at the NASA.gov site, it is pale comparison of what it used to be. They seem to have opted for a few well polished articles and images, and they've jettisoned any semblance of passing along the data itself.

I'm thinking of remote buttons to make his favorite things appear on tv. This is going to be awesome.

We had LAN parties and would play for hours on end with custom maps we had built or downloaded.

Two of the most authoritarian decisions by the supreme court have been progressive in nature: Kelo v. City of New London - where the government can redistribute wealth if it benefits the government, and the whole fiasco around the ACA, which defaults every American to being a criminal until they bought health insurance, using the commerce act as justification for the power grab.

About the ACA, whether I agree with national healthcare is irrelevant, this was not the way to do it -- by expanding the government's reach. There has to be consideration for what the administration does.