<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: LooseMarmoset</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=LooseMarmoset</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 21:13:54 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=LooseMarmoset" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LooseMarmoset in "Molotov cocktail is hurled at home of Sam Altman"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>From my own perspective, the "visceral hatred" isn't so much at AI (which I use almost exclusively to generate funny pictures of myself and coworkers) but at the executives that view it as a way to enshittify society.<p>turning myself (an overweight bearded guy) into an animated hula dancer and turning my coworker into the Terminator and sinking into molten steel don't seem to inspire the same hatred. unless you don't like hula dancers.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 19:28:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47722564</link><dc:creator>LooseMarmoset</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47722564</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47722564</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LooseMarmoset in "Lunar Flyby"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Big space stagnated because they could. Their friends in Congress directed them lots of money and lots of political cover, and they both profited handsomely. Why would they change? They never had so, and I might argue that they still don't. Cost-plus contracts, years spent in expensive consulting and planning, all these mean they make money whether they go to space or not. Every five or six years, they trot out a "new" plan that purports to solve all the problems of the old plan, with exciting presentations and hired speakers, and the then-current administration sees a way to drum up political support, and the lobbyists and Congress see a way to make even more money and political favors.<p>And now it's over 50 years since we last landed on the Moon.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 04:40:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47685334</link><dc:creator>LooseMarmoset</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47685334</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47685334</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LooseMarmoset in "Juggalo makeup blocks facial recognition technology (2019)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I wonder if kawaii face paint would work</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 20:15:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47445272</link><dc:creator>LooseMarmoset</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47445272</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47445272</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LooseMarmoset in "Honda is killing its EVs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Neither GM, Chrysler, or Ford wants to hurt their expensive offerings. Toyota and Nissan <i>have</i> less expensive offerings, but can't bring them here because the tariffs make them much less margin, and the CAFE standards kill the rest off.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 02:37:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47420997</link><dc:creator>LooseMarmoset</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47420997</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47420997</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LooseMarmoset in "Honda is killing its EVs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>CAFE killed small trucks in part, tariffs in another part, but US manufacturers are the real reason small trucks are dead.<p>US manufacturers want margins, and they're not getting margins on little, efficient cars. They get enormous margins on gigantic trucks that start at $55,000. Have you noticed that all the sub $20k cars went away from all the manufacturers around COVID?<p>Ford makes the Maverick, which is a small truck. They were priced very reasonably at release, at $19,000 or so. However, Ford didn't make very many of them, and the ones they did make got up to $15,000 over MSRP from the dealers, who scalped them. Why would Ford want to cannibalize their pricy gigantic trucks when they know that they can get their $50k asking price because there's nowhere else for people to go?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 22:09:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47419014</link><dc:creator>LooseMarmoset</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47419014</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47419014</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LooseMarmoset in "Illinois Introducing Operating System Account Age Bill"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>  The arguments I've heard against it are almost all slippery-slope (e.g. "they're gonna do this first, and then add ID requirements next year, because that's what I fear will happen.")<p>Because that's exactly what will happen. This is battlespace preparation for the destruction of anonymity on the internet, because politicians find this inconvenient.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47416526</link><dc:creator>LooseMarmoset</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47416526</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47416526</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LooseMarmoset in "Illinois Introducing Operating System Account Age Bill"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You shouldn't be downvoted for this, the problem is exactly as you described.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 18:37:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47416492</link><dc:creator>LooseMarmoset</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47416492</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47416492</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LooseMarmoset in "Ageless Linux – Software for humans of indeterminate age"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> out of style<p>a bunch of viral tiktok videos could bring it back pretty easy.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 00:35:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47382952</link><dc:creator>LooseMarmoset</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47382952</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47382952</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LooseMarmoset in "A new California law says all operating systems need to have age verification"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The micro stamping law is in no way reasonable because removing the micro stamping from the end of a firing pin is laughably trivial. The only people who won’t do this are people who weren’t going to break the law in the first place.<p>Even people who didn’t want to break the law might find themselves on the receiving end of law-enforcement if the firing pin wears such that the micro stamping is no longer identifiable.<p>The micro stamping law does nothing to prevent the flow of guns to people who should not have them, and does everything to prevent the use or purchase of guns by people who can lawfully own them - which is the whole point of a law like this. The people who make these laws are well aware of this.<p>The age verification law, coupled with the proposed hardware attestation that our good friend Lennart poettering is working on will ensure that anonymity on the Internet is gone. This is precisely what lawmakers are aiming for. And just like the micro stamping law, the intent of the law is not the literal word of the law.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 23:32:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47187538</link><dc:creator>LooseMarmoset</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47187538</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47187538</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LooseMarmoset in "Vitamin D supplements cut heart attack risk by 52%. Why?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I was put on 5000IU D2 and I got kidney stones, twice. The doctor wouldn't believe that  the D2 was the cause, but I stopped taking it and the stones have not recurred.<p>I would like to bring my D levels up, but not at the expense of kidney stones.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 23:29:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46831447</link><dc:creator>LooseMarmoset</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46831447</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46831447</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LooseMarmoset in "GOG: Linux "the next major frontier" for gaming as it works on a native client"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>While you're waiting for a GoG native client, I can whole-heartedly recommend:<p>Heroic Game Launcher: <a href="https://heroicgameslauncher.com/" rel="nofollow">https://heroicgameslauncher.com/</a><p>RPM/Deb/Flatpack/TGZ/AppImage for Linux<p>DMG for MacOS Intel/M1+<p>EXE for Windows<p>Heroic supports GoG, Amazon Luna, and the Epic Game stores.<p>Heroic even streamlines the app updates so you don't have to figure that out.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 16:36:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46826489</link><dc:creator>LooseMarmoset</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46826489</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46826489</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LooseMarmoset in "Devuan – Debian Without Systemd"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Everything else has moved in that direction:<p><pre><code>  * Literally every game console
  * Literally every smartphone
  * Microsoft, with their Win11 requirements, is moving there
  * John Deere (read on their own hardware attestation efforts to block DIY)
  * Car companies (require specialized tooling and software subscriptions to make certain repairs)
  * Anything that requires a signed bootloader and signed software updates
  * Snapdragon CPUs and e-fuses that burn when you use unsigned software, and brick
  * Apple hardware, literally crypto-signed so you can't use aftermarket parts
  * Google Chromecast
  * Amazon Kindle, locked hardware
  * IBM has locked hardware to their laptops for *years*. Ever try upgrading a wifi card in an IBM laptop? They're already invested in this
</code></pre>
the list goes on...of course it's coming to PC.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 17:49:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46798905</link><dc:creator>LooseMarmoset</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46798905</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46798905</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LooseMarmoset in "Lennart Poettering, Christian Brauner founded a new company"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Attestation is a critical feature for many H/W companies<p>Like John Deere. Read about how they use that sort of thing</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 16:06:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46797161</link><dc:creator>LooseMarmoset</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46797161</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46797161</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LooseMarmoset in "Devuan – Debian Without Systemd"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If you build remote attestation into your product, corporate entities will require it. Just look at Android - What phones today give you unlimited root? If you have rooted, what applications have you broken? If you root, what e-fuses have you blown in your CPU meaning it can never be un-rooted? Android, at the start, was open and freely modified - not so much anymore. Companies like Google can and <i>have</i> cut off access to user's data, <i>without recourse</i>. You can't modify your phone, so you don't own your phone. You just pay rent until they don't support it anymore.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 12:27:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46794443</link><dc:creator>LooseMarmoset</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46794443</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46794443</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LooseMarmoset in "Devuan – Debian Without Systemd"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Unnecessary entanglements<p>The problems with systemd are:<p><pre><code>  * that once it was adopted, every single package started requiring it
  * which meant that packages that previously could run everywhere, now could only run on systemd-based systems
  * binary logs - a solution that solved nothing but created problems 
  * which locked out any system that wasn't linux
  * which locked out any linux system that didn't want to use it
  * which led to abominations like systemd-resolved
  * "bUt yOu DoNt hAVe tO uSE it" - tell that to the remote attestation crowd, of which Poettering is a founding member of. see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46784572 - soon you'll have to use systemD because nothing else *can* be used.

</code></pre>
literally everything the systemD crowd has done leads to lockout and loss of choice. All ramrodded through by IBM/RedHat.<p>The systemD developers don't care about any of this, of course. They've got a long history of breaking user space and poor dev practices because they're systemD. I mean, their attitude was so bad they got one of their principal devs kicked from the kernel because they overloaded the use of the kernel boot parameter "debug", which flooded the console, and refused to modify the debug option to something compatible like "systemd.debug", broke literally every other system, and then told everybody else "hey we're not wrong, the rest of the world is wrong." And this has been their attitude since then.<p>Look, if people want to use systemD, that's just fine. But it is a fact that the entire development process for systemD is predicated on making Linux incompatible with anything else, which is an entire inversion of how Linux and Free Software works.<p>I actually <i>like</i> unit files. But if systemD was just an init system, it would stop there.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 12:18:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46794370</link><dc:creator>LooseMarmoset</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46794370</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46794370</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LooseMarmoset in "Lennart Poettering, Christian Brauner founded a new company"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It won't remain "server" attestation. It will become "client" attestation, with the end result that you won't own your own machine anymore, you'll just be paying for a client device upon which you won't control the hardware or software anymore. See any mobile phone at all, anymore.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 00:40:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46789404</link><dc:creator>LooseMarmoset</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46789404</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46789404</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LooseMarmoset in "Lennart Poettering, Christian Brauner founded a new company"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"The OS configuration and state (i.e. /etc/ and /var/) must be encrypted, and authenticated before they are used. The encryption key should be bound to the TPM device; i.e system data should be locked to a security concept belonging to the system, not the user."<p>See Android; or, where you no longer own your device, and if the company decides, you no longer own your data or access to it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 00:27:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46789296</link><dc:creator>LooseMarmoset</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46789296</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46789296</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LooseMarmoset in "Lennart Poettering, Christian Brauner founded a new company"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Have you run an Android device recently?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 00:22:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46789241</link><dc:creator>LooseMarmoset</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46789241</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46789241</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LooseMarmoset in "Lennart Poettering, Christian Brauner founded a new company"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No, the endgame is that a small handful of entities or a consortium will effectively "own" Linux because they'll be the only "trusted" systems. Welcome to locked-down "Linux".<p>You'll be free to run your own Linux, but don't expect it to work outside of niche uses.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 00:00:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46789012</link><dc:creator>LooseMarmoset</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46789012</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46789012</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LooseMarmoset in "Lennart Poettering, Christian Brauner founded a new company"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Android lets you put your own signed keys in on certain phones. For now.<p>The banking apps still won't trust them, though.<p>To add a quote from Lennart himself:<p>"The OS configuration and state (i.e. /etc/ and /var/) must be encrypted, and authenticated before they are used. The encryption key should be bound to the TPM device; i.e system data should be locked to a security concept belonging to the system, not the user."<p>Your system will not belong to you anymore. Just as it is with Android.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 23:56:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46788984</link><dc:creator>LooseMarmoset</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46788984</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46788984</guid></item></channel></rss>