<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: LunicLynx</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=LunicLynx</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 23:21:49 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=LunicLynx" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LunicLynx in "Born Against, or why hobby programming communities are against LLM usage"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is actually a great analogy. And I think it works very well. Because what llms deliver is not the exquisite dish, the carefully  crafted solution.<p>It’s just a solution that might scratch the itch but never fully blow you away.
One time use software essentially.<p>If that is good or bad remains to be seen.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 10:24:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49194816</link><dc:creator>LunicLynx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49194816</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49194816</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LunicLynx in "Intelligence Is Not the Main Bottleneck"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, that is kind of my point. The AI is nothing without the human giving it a goal (ingenuity).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 19:19:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49187612</link><dc:creator>LunicLynx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49187612</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49187612</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LunicLynx in "Intelligence Is Not the Main Bottleneck"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ingenuity is the actual bottleneck. And AI so far hasn’t shown any</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 15:29:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49184314</link><dc:creator>LunicLynx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49184314</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49184314</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LunicLynx in "Anthropic AI created fake profiles and impersonated people in attempted hack"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So you are saying a model that is good at discovering security vulnerabilities is also good at exploiting them. Surprise?<p>Will be interesting to see if this should have been the inflection point of: „where it all started to go wrong“</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 14:20:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49183336</link><dc:creator>LunicLynx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49183336</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49183336</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LunicLynx in "Prevent cognitive debt by manually retyping LLM-generated code"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The industry does. Not. Care.<p>64 GB of RAM, nough said?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 22:17:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49162199</link><dc:creator>LunicLynx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49162199</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49162199</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LunicLynx in "Show HN: Hacker News with AI stories filtered out"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Awesome! Finally the hacker news I originally came for</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 19:40:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49160448</link><dc:creator>LunicLynx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49160448</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49160448</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LunicLynx in "I don't recommend Tailwind CSS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The problem isn’t tailwind, it’s css.<p>It always has been css.<p>That being said, it’s a hard problem and I don’t have a better idea.<p>Tailwind seems to at least fix or move the problem in the right direction.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 08:32:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49142334</link><dc:creator>LunicLynx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49142334</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49142334</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LunicLynx in "The Productivity Mirage"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://strangestloop.io/essays/things-that-arent-doing-the-thing" rel="nofollow">https://strangestloop.io/essays/things-that-arent-doing-the-...</a><p>Comes to mind.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 11:47:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49108702</link><dc:creator>LunicLynx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49108702</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49108702</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LunicLynx in "Git rebase -I is not that scary"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>One additional thing I would mention ist that: When resolving conflicts never try to solve them for the final result. Consider each conflict without considering how the code will change in a later commit. I’ve seen people die a painful rebase death because of this.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 09:01:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49056111</link><dc:creator>LunicLynx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49056111</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49056111</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LunicLynx in "What AI did to stackoverflow in a graph"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think Ai is not the issue here. SEO on the other hand very much. It’s not like any one ever went to stackoverflow to find a solution, it was just that they were the google results for a lot of things</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 14:36:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48958535</link><dc:creator>LunicLynx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48958535</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48958535</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LunicLynx in "AWS: Inaccurate Estimated Billing Data – $1.7 billion"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Need some money for a new Launchpad</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 19:57:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48951639</link><dc:creator>LunicLynx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48951639</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48951639</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LunicLynx in "Shrimple – A Simpler, Nicer Markdown"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Having the dashes to make something a headline on another row disconnects meaning.
You now have to edit two lines to make one change.<p>Same for the code part.<p>This might be easier to read but it’s not simpler.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 07:31:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48801672</link><dc:creator>LunicLynx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48801672</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48801672</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LunicLynx in "Odin, Wikipedia and engagement farming"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not if the perception of Wikipedia is „truthful“ and „reliable“.<p>I’m saying neither, but in that case the article on Wikipedia puts weight behind the statements on the webpage.<p>I do see your argument: „But it would be adjusted to reflect the truth about it“. Honestly I don’t know enough about Wikipedia to agree or deny it. But given the amount of articles on it, i would lean in the direction that the motivation of a single few would win over the curators.
Which means applying a vector that cannot be influenced by those few.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 07:06:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48783260</link><dc:creator>LunicLynx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48783260</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48783260</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LunicLynx in "The KIDS Act would require age checks to get online"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I could accept that there shouldn’t be content for children on the internet, at all, to make this an easy sell.<p>Parents will not solve this. They would need to first care and then to be as tech savvy as the people in this forum. And then all the content would need to be attributed correctly. If if if, and here we are</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 12:12:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48718240</link><dc:creator>LunicLynx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48718240</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48718240</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LunicLynx in "The KIDS Act would require age checks to get online"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don’t disagree with what you are saying but it isn’t a solution to the problem. And the problem is about the children.<p>Without trying to offend you, but you are arguing this as: we don’t need to regulate alcohol or drugs because experiences, for everyone, will be better in the end…</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 11:59:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48718110</link><dc:creator>LunicLynx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48718110</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48718110</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LunicLynx in "The KIDS Act would require age checks to get online"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Maybe this is about time. It’s pretty clear that the internet as such is not and never has been for children.<p>But the way it is done is weird for sure.<p>But how do you do it in a way that it isn’t a burden on the parents or peer pressure the issue that breaks the intent?<p>Or is your point that the internet should be used by children?<p>If so how do you propose restricting the harmful content?<p>From my point of view we are in the digital Middle Ages. We do not yet understand if this global connection is actually being good or bad in the long run. The only thing that starts to crystallize is that it isn’t great for children. Specifically social media, especially especially people gaining access to children on troves to spread ideology.<p>So how to solve it. And „I don’t like the current approach“ without having a better idea is not a solution.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 11:15:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48717702</link><dc:creator>LunicLynx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48717702</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48717702</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LunicLynx in "Gossamer: a Rust-flavoured language with real goroutines and pause-free memory"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Just a comment: Rust does not have a garbage collector</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 21:54:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692468</link><dc:creator>LunicLynx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692468</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692468</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LunicLynx in "Hey Nico, you didn't vibe code your data room but stole it from Papermark"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Isn't this always the case? Most of the time you just don't know where AI stole it from?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 07:10:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48683341</link><dc:creator>LunicLynx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48683341</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48683341</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LunicLynx in "Blogging can just be stating the obvious"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Disclaimer; have not read the article.<p>My current feeling about blogging is, that it more then anything else is we’re certian knowledge of AI came from. The arguments for blogging being the thing again also started at the same time AI got traction.<p>Just identify the bloggers that know their craft, weight them height. And you got yourself a step change in LLM competency.<p>Paying no one.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 02:58:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668289</link><dc:creator>LunicLynx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668289</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668289</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LunicLynx in "Code duplication is far cheaper than the wrong abstraction (2016)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The generic repository "pattern" is the prime example of this. There might be CRUD operations shared between repositories, but they should not be that base of every repository.
I've seen this so many times, because in the beginning the CRUD stuff is what you code over and over again and then suddenly business logic emerges and everything breaks down, but the repository prevails because sunk cost fallacy ...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 18:02:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621047</link><dc:creator>LunicLynx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621047</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621047</guid></item></channel></rss>