So is it a F# issue or inherent to functional programming?

But still there is a difference between learning and mastering.

I recently helped my partner learn for her CS class, and I feel very comfortable arguing that my previous statement holds up.

Mastering? No, in that case I agree with you.

The only things that I wish for are: rusts borrow-checker and memory management. And the AOT story would be more natural.

Besides that, for me, it is the general purpose language.

For you it may be fine to write:

List strs = new List();

And sure if you have been using C# for years you know all the things going on here.

But it shouldn’t be an argument that:

List strs = [];

Is substentionally easier to grasp.

And that has been the theme of all changes.

The example you point out is the advanced case, someone only needs in a very specific case. It does not have a lot todo with learning the language.

The language design team is really making sure that the features work well throughout and I think that does deserve some credit.

So far everything that was added to C# very much reduces the amount of dead boilerplate code other languages struggle with.

Really give it an honest try before you judge it based on the summation of headlines.

So, money, for supposed control. Which is not true of course

Might be just me though, but I definitely don’t get why blogging should be the solution.

I agree when it comes to spectators, at least in some sports.

But people do make a living, especially in poor countries, by being successful in sports.

For some people sports is their life and livelihood for that matter, this should be acknowledged.

For this article to be relevant a spot for the Olympics of either gender has been taken by a trans athlete.

Which by conclusion means that a trans person outperformed the other gender.

Taking part in the Olympics is a difficult endeavor, for which you must qualify first.

„But Jonas parents allow him to do that“ in reality Jonas parents should not have a say in this.

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: Yes, but not in Germany

Technologies: Yes. ASM to C# to Kubernetes, too many to list.

CV: Only on request

Email: fdohrendorf (a) gmail.com

Also if you want to gain something by being less specific, eg. not writing code, and then want to be specific in writing a spec, then you just switched a precise system for an imprecise one.

Even the already included escape route.

> If I tell you I have evidence Tesla is lying you'll tell me to show it or STFU.

I mean I wouldn’t choose those words but yes. Yes, you have to prove it, because you state it as a fact.

Innocent until proven guilty. There is a reason to this phrase.

I think taking time to make sure the system works is the right call. Delaying it is the right call. Not publishing something because you had a different impression previously, just because, is the right call.

I think it integrity to delay a product even when your investors might get angry. Is it a winning strategy at wallstreet? No, probably not.

But what is the argument here „Musk bad“ because he delays a product because it’s not ready?

I think doing the due diligence is required here. Musk argument „it’s solved“ could even be argued by „look at Waymo“ they are doing it, aren’t they?

Tesla is aiming for more than that though. And as it is in product development sometimes, sometimes your don’t know what you don‘t know. Because why do you want to focus on chains guarding parkingspots, your cameras aren’t able to see, when your car can’t even drive through the city.

This is such a big thing to solve and 100% is impossible given some definitions.

Back to the article, I think delaying for safety is the right call, and that is also what the article says. It’s just that the article is in bad faith, as most of the arguments here are.

You probably would turn around and slam Musk for a System that obviously problematic as the alternative and until then it’s saying that he delays.

And if it were obviously problematic I think it would be much louder than just an article from a website that is know for having a biased view at things.