<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: LurkerAbove</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=LurkerAbove</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 07:57:58 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=LurkerAbove" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LurkerAbove in "Ask HN: What are you working on? (May 2026)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I had an idea about explaining ML predictions without direct access to the data or the model:  provide basic stats about your data, use them to generate synthetic data, then train a surrogate to predict your model's predictions on the synthetic data.<p>Could be handy for model risk management and governance, e.g. if you need a challenger model for SR 11-7 without all the hassle of getting access to the original data, getting the black box model set up, and so on.  I wrote it because I remember having to create "throwaway" models to show why I needed a better model; it would have been nice to just make a couple of API calls instead.<p>SDK: <a href="https://github.com/proxyml/proxyml-sdk-python" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/proxyml/proxyml-sdk-python</a><p>Schema builder: <a href="https://github.com/proxyml/schema-builder" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/proxyml/schema-builder</a><p>Landing page: <a href="https://proxyml.ai/" rel="nofollow">https://proxyml.ai/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 12:38:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48094207</link><dc:creator>LurkerAbove</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48094207</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48094207</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LurkerAbove in "Banks scramble to fix old systems as IT 'cowboys' ride into sunset"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I had a recruiter contact me about a COBOL --> Java project a couple of weeks ago.  I don't remember the $100/hour part though, seems like that would've stuck with me!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 17:50:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14090587</link><dc:creator>LurkerAbove</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14090587</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14090587</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LurkerAbove in "Why Are Ultrasound Machines So Expensive?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't have experience with medical ultrasound, but I have built a few basic ultrasonic systems around a PC or a single board computer for structural testing applications.  If you're not doing phased array ultrasonics you can build a system for under $1000USD, possibly less if you can use PVDF instead of PZT.  The expensive part is the software.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:07:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13232185</link><dc:creator>LurkerAbove</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13232185</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13232185</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LurkerAbove in "Quit Social Media, Your Career May Depend on It"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've recently started reading the dead tree version of the newspaper and I've noticed that only do I seem to retain more of what I've read vs. reading the electronic version, for me it's something along the lines of a focus exercise.  It really feels like it's clearing out the cobwebs.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2016 14:35:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12999013</link><dc:creator>LurkerAbove</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12999013</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12999013</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LurkerAbove in "Sputtering Startups Weigh on U.S. Economic Growth"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If SEP IRAs as mentioned above aren't an option, HSAs might be worth considering - after 65 they aren't restricted to medical expenses.  I-bonds might be an interesting component for future retirement as well.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:41:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12781560</link><dc:creator>LurkerAbove</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12781560</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12781560</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LurkerAbove in "Ask HN: Experiences with the free GitLab account vs. competitors?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Page loads on GL.com can take a while, but I wouldn't say that I've found the actual pull/push cycle to be slow per se.  I'd describe it more like "measurable."</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:24:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12778167</link><dc:creator>LurkerAbove</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12778167</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12778167</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LurkerAbove in "Ask HN: Experiences with the free GitLab account vs. competitors?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I used to more or less alternate between Github and Bitbucket but I've been using GitLab exclusively for the past six months.  So far it's been a mostly painless transition.  I've only had one hiccup, I had an IP banned for an hour or so but that's more Netbeans' fault than GitLab's .</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:49:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12778027</link><dc:creator>LurkerAbove</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12778027</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12778027</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by LurkerAbove in "JDK 9 release schedule"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Earlier this year I was working with an outfit that was on Java 4 for A Really Important Business Application.  That said, they were looking at moving to IIRC 7 just as I was leaving.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 18:58:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12737564</link><dc:creator>LurkerAbove</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12737564</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12737564</guid></item></channel></rss>