I use a Yubikey for some of my keys, and I've never used an "agent", don't know how, and don't want to start, unless someone can give me a good reason to

ssh-keygen -t ed25519-sk

that's all you need to use a Yubikey with SSH

Gee, I wonder why that's there.

Also there is an option, modify the libre source code that is provided to you.

Name checks out.

This is a funny thing to study though, I'm really curious what they hope to gain from this 'knowledge'.

Though, most individuals at least have the financial excuse. This station did not. (In fact, long term, a local copy of the data would cost significantly less than a monthly/yearly billed cloud storage provider.)

2 is one, and 1 is none.

I wouldn't hire someone with this mindset of yours to run the IT at my company, we'd lose data for sure.

All of these are free (if you ignore electricity cost of hosting your own git server), and each one is a backup of sorts.

I don't necessarily recommend starting with GitLab though unless you want advanced CI capabilities, but you're already used to GitHub so you should consider self hosted gitea, which uses the same Actions syntax and even has some interoperability with its action modules I think.

But yeah, my recommendation is just to push to as many (free) git hosts as you can. Why not take advantage of free code storage if it's available. Plus if any one host goes down you can still retrieve your code from the others.

Apparently you didn't find them important enough to have backups. Hundreds of thousands of dollars a year in net income and they couldn't afford a cheap NAS with 4 disks. Incredible.

Perhaps it's not actually irony, perhaps it is hypocrisy.

This isn't to say there aren't correct statements in the article, but its framed very strangely.

I yearn for humanity to stop being so greedy and always looking for the cheapest crap they can get, so they can pretend to be rich by having a lot of stuff. Particularly people in countries like America (where I live), are too comfortable, and pretend to live above their means (not necessarily consciously) by partaking of low quality mass produced goods.

There's only one thing in the article I disagree with:

> RIRs (ARIN, RIPE, APNIC) Go Financially Bankrupt

This is purely an argument of pragmatism, rather than having any technical merit. If a system works, and meaningfully improves over another system, I couldn't care less that people aren't able to effectively monetize it.

Can a user blindly trust this sandbox, because that's how people will treat it based on the marketing. Sounds like it could be useful for far more than just AI though.