<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: Matuzy</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=Matuzy</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 16:17:31 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=Matuzy" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Matuzy in "My security camera shipped a GitHub admin token in its login page"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thanks for the reply. I'm reminded every now and then of the magnitude of the address space in v6. Then I do nothing with that information and slowly lose appreciation for the size again :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:59:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49036674</link><dc:creator>Matuzy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49036674</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49036674</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Matuzy in "My security camera shipped a GitHub admin token in its login page"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Yet another thing ipv6 solves. ... it's unlikely to conflict with the current global range<p>I'm not familiar with IPv6's details, could you elaborate on this? To me, this reads like you're saying that IPv6 solves the problem by having low adoption rates rather than an actual function of the protocol.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:24:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49036142</link><dc:creator>Matuzy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49036142</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49036142</guid></item></channel></rss>