<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: MezzoDelCammin</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=MezzoDelCammin</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 01:55:08 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=MezzoDelCammin" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MezzoDelCammin in "Aluminum foil (2021)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>any tips on how to reliably get that "thicker gauge" one? I've been craving it since maybe 20y ago when I got a roll from my old stint in a restaurant. I've tried buying some rolls by "heavy duty" labels and these days it's just as likely to be one of those thin "look at it funny and it tears".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 16:28:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806913</link><dc:creator>MezzoDelCammin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806913</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806913</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MezzoDelCammin in "Reality has a surprising amount of detail (2017)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>at this point I'd wonder if the cat's name is "Princess Donut"</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 09:10:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48772749</link><dc:creator>MezzoDelCammin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48772749</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48772749</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MezzoDelCammin in "Canyon HUD helmet for road riding"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm not sure about the "question nobody asked". Bluetooth is perhaps a gimmick, but in all seriousness an electrically actuated derailleur is a blessing for anyone doing audax / long distance. I have my wrists damaged enough from sitting at a keyboard all day. I don't have to add to it whenever I need to shift gears on a bike.<p>I see the point of it being a potential e-waste in 10 years, but I'm not sure the mechanical route was much better in that respect (looking at you, shimano shifter-derailleur-brake compatibility table that currently runs a few pages long even before adding all the Di2 stuff)<p>BTW - "what" do You need a 48-spoke hub for? Are You building cargo bikes in Your spare time? I'm not trying to be snarky - the "all our bikes load limit is 120kg bicycle included" has long been bothering me as well (100kg rider), so... kinda curious about Your side projects</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 17:44:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663281</link><dc:creator>MezzoDelCammin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663281</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663281</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MezzoDelCammin in "DeepSeek v4"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think the answer to this is:"yes"</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 10:24:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47900267</link><dc:creator>MezzoDelCammin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47900267</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47900267</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MezzoDelCammin in "Ask HN: Any interesting niche hobbies?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>OK, fairly specific question - how did You get to that pants silouhete? It seems from the pics You went for something like a straight leg plus some extra room and fairly fitted waist / butt. Is that a response to a trend (oversized work clothes seem to be the thing these past few years), or is there some practical reason too (mainly for the extra room in the leg shape)?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 14:56:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47704592</link><dc:creator>MezzoDelCammin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47704592</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47704592</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MezzoDelCammin in "Sizing chaos"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Oh, I'm not claiming sewing machine is the "only" option :-)<p>There's plenty of hacking that can be done on the subject of sewing and I admit that laser cutter is a cool one.<p>I'm still pretty partial to that sewing machine route (or needle and thread, if handiwork is prefferable). Simply because it lets you quickly iterate and build the taste, preferences and heuristic of how to get there. Personally, I still can't read a pattern propetly. But I'm more than happy to put a few pins into a shirt and prototype in front of a mirror.<p>Also, it gives me a good estimate of what I'm OK doing myself and what I will outsource to an actual tailor because it's either beyond my level, or I simply don't have time to do it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 12:24:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47073046</link><dc:creator>MezzoDelCammin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47073046</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47073046</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MezzoDelCammin in "Sizing chaos"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>TLDR : "nice to have, but not a necessity"<p>For some basic jerseys (think T-shirts) a basic zigzag is fine to begin with. That 100EUR sewing machine will have some fancier stretch stitch options that are slow, but "good enough" to look like an overlock (but can't do the cut of course).<p>If you have the space / money, overlock is definitely what I'd get as a second / third machine. It's much quicker / cleaner if you're working on jerseys or shirts.<p>But I still keep wearing the T-shirts I did when I was starting. On my list the first thing to do is to understand how to alter something to fit you. It can be done by hand (needle and thread), but to be reasonably efficient, the BOM would be "sewing machine, box of pins, scissors, piece of chalk / ruler and something to press / iron".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 10:50:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47072415</link><dc:creator>MezzoDelCammin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47072415</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47072415</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MezzoDelCammin in "Sizing chaos"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For everyone struggling with clothes sizing and having a hacker mindset, I can't recommend enough buying a sewing machine (~100EUR on a used market, ~150 new gets you a reasonable starter one you won't outgrow any time soon) and giving clothes alterations a try.<p>Finding a tailor that understands you / you agree with is an option too, if time is a hard limit (though I'm not sure it's altogrther that much quicker).<p>In my case, I started with tailors, but kept running into small misunderstandings. Also, my taste keeps evolving.<p>Start small with simple stuff, ideally old / second hand cheap clothes. Shirts, T-Shirts and bodice waistlines / "darts" are almost trivial once you can follow a straight line. First one will take a while, second will be much quicker, by third / fourth it's almost a routine and you can start iterating on your own preferences. They likely "will" evolve as you keep wearing the altered clothes.<p>Depending on how much help you can get in the beginning, with maybe a 2-3h intro on how to use a sewing machine done by a friend who has sewing as a hobby, I'm pretty sure most people should be able to get their first alterations done within 4-5h. By second or third attempt, this  time should be down to around 1h per item, including some setup (pinning - trying - ironing). At that point the DIY option is probably quicker than going to a tailor.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 10:25:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47072257</link><dc:creator>MezzoDelCammin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47072257</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47072257</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MezzoDelCammin in "Ask HN: What did you read in 2025?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Fiction (shortlist):<p>-Some Desperate Glory (Emily Tesh)<p>-A Memory called Empire (Arkady Martin) both of these are a fairly interesting take on scifi worldbuilding. Could be called "highbrow", but IMO pretty easy reads still.<p>-Piranesi (S. Clark) - well written fantasy
and plenty of other stuff that I've seen in other comments (Dungeon Crawler Carl does stand out a bit, but it's really a guilty pleasure / escape kind of a read).<p>Non-Fiction<p>-Brakneck (Dan Wang) - slightly outdated (by ~2y, which seems really breakneck), but still interesting take on modern China<p>-Capitalism (Sven Beckert) - still halfway through this one, but it's shaping up to be my #1 for 2025 non fiction<p>-The Origins of Efficiency - from B. Potter, the author of Construction Physics blog. The blog is fairly information dense, but this basically reads like a textbook. Still a pretty good reference IMO for people working in manufacturing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 21:45:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46396636</link><dc:creator>MezzoDelCammin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46396636</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46396636</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MezzoDelCammin in "Designing a Passive Lidar Detector Device"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I admit it's a nice experiment, but I guess the title should be "detecting iPhone Lidar".<p>Both the 60Hz frequency and 940nm wavelength are fairly specific. There's a whole world of different wavelengths (1550nm is fairly common) and frequencies (up to 1MHz isn't particularly exceptional).<p>There's been a whole thread on the topic here:<p><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46110395">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46110395</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 14:21:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46326144</link><dc:creator>MezzoDelCammin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46326144</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46326144</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MezzoDelCammin in "Largest cargo sailboat completes first Atlantic crossing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Have You checked the validity of registration/insurance? I'm kinda curious about doing it the other way and trying some BDRs) maybe in a few years)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2025 14:44:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45865924</link><dc:creator>MezzoDelCammin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45865924</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45865924</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MezzoDelCammin in "Tailscale Peer Relays"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>mind developping on the "it's DERP or nothing"? Have you been trying to expose a direct wireguard port of your own, or the Tailscale?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:57:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45757789</link><dc:creator>MezzoDelCammin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45757789</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45757789</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MezzoDelCammin in "More random home lab things I've recently learned"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>personally : proxmox /VM is great if You'd like to separate physical HW. In my case - virtualized TrueNAS means I can give it a whole SATA controller and keep this as an isolated storage machine.<p>Whatever uses that storage usually runs in a Docker inside an LXC container.<p>If I need something more isolated (think public facing cloudflare) - that's a separate docker in another network routed through another OPNSense VM.<p>Desktop - VM where I passed down a whole GPU and a USB hub.<p>Best part - it all runs on a fairly low power HW (<20W idle NAS plus whatever the harddrives take - generally ~5W / HDD).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 15:24:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45569376</link><dc:creator>MezzoDelCammin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45569376</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45569376</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MezzoDelCammin in "Who owns Express VPN, Nord, Surfshark? VPN relationships explained (2024)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>AirVPNs main proposition isn't "we have a nice app / UX". It's "we give you the most configs / options". AFAIK they're currently one of very few that allow you to configure both port forwards and give you a stable config (keys) to run your own wireguard instance</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 08:05:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45500566</link><dc:creator>MezzoDelCammin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45500566</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45500566</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MezzoDelCammin in "Who owns Express VPN, Nord, Surfshark? VPN relationships explained (2024)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>my $.02 : I tried them, but found their "we support Wireguard" a bit misleading. They only did so via their app. No way to get a stable configuration for a router (other than run a python script to get one from the app, without any guarantee how long is that config valid for).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 08:01:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45500539</link><dc:creator>MezzoDelCammin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45500539</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45500539</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MezzoDelCammin in "Lidar, optical distance and time of flight sensors"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>true. My original was just a quick jote on a phone sipping a coffee on Sunday. I admit I simply didn't want to go into the whole "square FOV for the sensor vs. one detector / diode and that combined with the time of flight loss over distance", so I just used "exponential" to mean "it loses power pretty quickly".  Apologies for the sloppiness on my part.<p>Second part of the comment I omitted is was what You mentioned in the beginning. Those 20-30 meters of practical range is why we keep seeing small LIDAR sensors on things like iPhones / iPads (though there I believe the range is even a bit shorter due to the size / power constraints), but not really much beyond that.<p>For practical demo of what's currently available at the high end of solid state LIDAR (albeit at 40k+ USD), I'd suggest looking at Leica and their BLK2GO PULSE (solid state) vs the rest of the BLK line (rotating laser spot).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 09:05:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45330839</link><dc:creator>MezzoDelCammin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45330839</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45330839</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MezzoDelCammin in "Lidar, optical distance and time of flight sensors"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Also there's the simple physics view of the same problem. The advantage of scanning is that you can focus all the laser pulse energy into one narrow beam. Non scanning means covering the whole field of view at once with that same laser pulse. Then you have a choice. Either somehow deal with the exponentially weaker return pulse (since it's spread over the whole field of view), or try to increase the pulse energy (and there you're limited by laser safety regulations)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2025 08:33:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45321048</link><dc:creator>MezzoDelCammin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45321048</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45321048</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MezzoDelCammin in "How to install TrueNAS on a Raspberry Pi"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Shouldn't it be more of a "why" to install TrueNAS on a RPi?<p>The only reason I can see is "I have one that I don't use". Because otherwise...<p>Idle power isn't all that much better than a low power Intel N100 or something similar. And it's all downhill from there. Network transfer speeds and disk transfers will all be kneecapped by the (lack of) available PCIe lanes. Available RAM or CPU speeds are even worse...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 15:40:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45053585</link><dc:creator>MezzoDelCammin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45053585</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45053585</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MezzoDelCammin in "Low cost mmWave 60GHz radar sensor for advanced sensing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not even that. I think I had mine for under 150 (on some sale). Also, there are a few cheaper alternatives, but some tests have shown them to be less reliable (either false positives, or worse - false "all clear").<p>There's one feature they all miss. They only measure relative velocity to You. That's definitely better than nothing, but in my experience the most dangerous drivers aren't necessarily the fastest ones, but those who pass too closely. So, something like "angle of approach" measurement would be a feature I'd personally be willing to switch my Varia for something else.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2025 07:31:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44699507</link><dc:creator>MezzoDelCammin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44699507</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44699507</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MezzoDelCammin in "Gridfinity: The modular, open-source grid storage system"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>thanks for this one. I've just printed my first two stacks of Multiboard for the office after only reading the license summary.<p>The way they play with "Designed Works" and "commercial use" is really pretty weird. I kinda understand the aim - it's just one guy who's probably trying to make a startup out of this and is kinda hedging his bases against someone coming up with an injection moulded copy on Aliexpress. But the way "commercial use" is left vague is pretty sketchy. Is e.g. "background of an office in a youtube video"  considered "commercial use"?<p>That being said, I guess I'll still finish at least one wall with it. I've used a few pegboards over the years and in my experience, these things don't die on licensing. They die on the fact that the manufacturer stops making them / switches to a different size / type. Here I can at least save the STLs and reprint the stuff as needed.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 11:33:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44421995</link><dc:creator>MezzoDelCammin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44421995</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44421995</guid></item></channel></rss>