<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: MintPaw</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=MintPaw</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 17:32:41 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=MintPaw" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MintPaw in "Stop Making TUIs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why would this be true? The way "single instance mode" usually works is by taking a global mutex or making a lock file. What makes this not possible for TUI apps? Isn't it just culture?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 17:11:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49391073</link><dc:creator>MintPaw</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49391073</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49391073</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MintPaw in "Feature Request: Support AGENTS.md"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Probably because it makes distilling and external analysis/tracking harder.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 20:17:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49379675</link><dc:creator>MintPaw</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49379675</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49379675</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[On Comments]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://blog.helsing.ai/posts/on-comments/">https://blog.helsing.ai/posts/on-comments/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49263234">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49263234</a></p>
<p>Points: 4</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 19:26:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://blog.helsing.ai/posts/on-comments/</link><dc:creator>MintPaw</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49263234</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49263234</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MintPaw in "Ghost Cut – Or why Cut and Paste is broken everywhere"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's an interesting thought, but hard to imagine how this would be implemented system wide. The clipboard would need to remember the source application, and have some kind of unique identifier to issue a delete to the source application.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:18:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49026710</link><dc:creator>MintPaw</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49026710</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49026710</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MintPaw in "Who's afraid of Chinese models?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I see your point, but this isn't exactly true, it only takes a single person to bias a model by deleting specific training data or over training on certain facts.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 06:00:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48988596</link><dc:creator>MintPaw</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48988596</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48988596</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MintPaw in "Qwen 3.8"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm not sure what the situation is here, but on many sites making alt account to avoid bans can result in a lifetime ban. A high profile figure who's been banned from a service advertising that they still have access to it might be a risk.<p>Also, these companies (or data brokers) likely share ban and alt account lists, ban evading could hurt the reputation of all your accounts.<p>These are some pragmatic reasons not to evade bans.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 03:55:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48974177</link><dc:creator>MintPaw</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48974177</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48974177</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MintPaw in "Claude Code uses Bun written in Rust now"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is a general problem with destructors, you can't "batch delete" objects. To free a lot of stuff you're required to go pointer by pointer through the tree to clean up each object. To get real performance gains from pools you can't have per-object/subobject custom cleanup code.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 03:24:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48974025</link><dc:creator>MintPaw</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48974025</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48974025</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MintPaw in "Just Pay the Subscription"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is way too absolute a point. There's services like water and internet service you're effectively subscribed too that don't get worse. There's obvious efficiencies that can be gained from regularizing demand with subscriptions. Amazon Prime is another example of a something I've been subscribed to for over a decade and I don't feel has gotten worse.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 00:44:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48854394</link><dc:creator>MintPaw</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48854394</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48854394</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MintPaw in "The labor share of income in the US is at its lowest post-war level"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not you particularly, I meant the original: "it feels like every share of income is at its lowest except for the ultra wealthy."<p>It's ambiguous in several way, no time scale, "ultra wealthy" isn't defined, and "income" somewhat ambiguous.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:54:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736493</link><dc:creator>MintPaw</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736493</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736493</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MintPaw in "The labor share of income in the US is at its lowest post-war level"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Data is the answer, it's just that so few people are willing to look at unbiased data. Although the start is asking a more measurable question.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:30:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735126</link><dc:creator>MintPaw</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735126</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735126</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MintPaw in "US Supreme Court rules geofence warrants require constitutional protections"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There's a whole category of video content called "First Amendment Audits" where people film with big cameras in public and farm people random, and often quite hostile, reactions.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:45:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48727221</link><dc:creator>MintPaw</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48727221</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48727221</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MintPaw in "Bun has an open PR adding shared-memory threads to JavaScriptCore"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is at odds with the idea that devs should take full accountability for LLM generated code.<p>He also didn't even say the code was generated by Claude, just the description, although a decent amount of the code probably was.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 15:15:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48619672</link><dc:creator>MintPaw</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48619672</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48619672</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MintPaw in "AURpocalypse now: a look at the recent AUR attacks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A side note, isn't package maintenance something that can actually be solved to some extent by LLMs? The prompt would be something like "Clone this repo and build this package while building/bundling as few other packages as possible with minimal code changes."<p>Then set it in a loop on all the packages for a particular system, I don't have experience in package maintenance and would be curious what kind of issues would come up.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 02:54:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48605916</link><dc:creator>MintPaw</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48605916</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48605916</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nagent, a uniuqe LLM loop reference implementation]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://github.com/macton/nagent">https://github.com/macton/nagent</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48468610">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48468610</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 22:21:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://github.com/macton/nagent</link><dc:creator>MintPaw</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48468610</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48468610</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MintPaw in "Apparently Google hates us now"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm not sure about that, they could do far worse than delist you if they really hated you.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 19:01:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48212444</link><dc:creator>MintPaw</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48212444</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48212444</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MintPaw in "Qwen3.7-Max: The Agent Frontier"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Interesting point, but I'd always thought the opposite, you're much better protected by the law if you use services from your own country.<p>If you use a service outside your country, I believe you could have all your code stolen and get hacked/exploited in a way that would be totally legal.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 18:58:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48212391</link><dc:creator>MintPaw</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48212391</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48212391</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MintPaw in "Ontario auditors find doctors' AI note takers routinely blow basic facts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What is a voicemail in this context? What app is reading it?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 04:05:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144438</link><dc:creator>MintPaw</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144438</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144438</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MintPaw in "Linux gaming is faster because Windows APIs are becoming Linux kernel features"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Detect the mouse moving in a "non-human way"? If it were that easy there'd be no hackers. And even if it where, what about wall hacks?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 16:48:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48137900</link><dc:creator>MintPaw</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48137900</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48137900</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MintPaw in "Software Developers Say AI Is Rotting Their Brains"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There's just different types of programming, I also find that if I give a decent description of a bug an LLM will often find the problem, and that great in a system that's mostly legacy and hard to repro. LLMs are also good for quick small scale from-scratch projects.<p>But there's a middle ground where you're really have to build something out that's super complicated and performant. Or do refactors that have a high quality bar. Situations where code bloat really matters. LLMs tend to create crazy amounts of code, not really thinking through the broader system and taking system level in-variance constraints seriously.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 02:40:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48130486</link><dc:creator>MintPaw</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48130486</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48130486</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by MintPaw in "Linux gaming is faster because Windows APIs are becoming Linux kernel features"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I recently had my faith shattered with I saw someone lock onto an ally through a wall in a kill cam, and I haven't played sense.<p>Blatant cheaters are bad in some ways, but subtle cheat are far worse imo.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 01:43:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48130157</link><dc:creator>MintPaw</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48130157</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48130157</guid></item></channel></rss>