Absolutely disagree with this—you can't acquire a billion dollars without sacrificing major ethics.

Many other countries—especially countries nearly as rich as us—manage a lower crime rate with a lower proportion of spending on policing and lower sentencing times. I have full faith we can improve on those systems, too—there's boatloads of evidence showing that financial safety nets invested in over decades is a much more cost-effective way of reducing crime.

Regardless, even in justice theory there are other ideologies, such as restorative justice. This is not just idle windbagging.

Why are you comparing it to a lack of a justice system rather than to a more competent justice system?

> We can compare to other countries and see their rates of crime, but such comparisons are difficult to make accurately because you are judging all social differences at once, not just a different legal system. Including things like how much lead has the population been exposed to, effect of poverty and sense of community. Things far beyond the legal system.

Poverty is absolutely a part of the legal system—it takes the legal institution of private property, for instance, to ensure wealth stays unequal.

Oh is that why our justice system is so terrible at actually reducing crime?

Apologies if this was a rhetorical question.

That's pretty much the norm on twitter, idk about other social networks. On some social networks (including twitter) it's quite normal to just lurk and not contribute anything.

Also how little content they can actually fit on screen. When you optimize for press release photos everyone suffers.

Anyway, a law institution certainly has an incentive to push their own agenda when it comes to the theory of justice.

Under a punitive justice system like we have in the US—sure. It doesn't seem to have improved anything at first glance, though.

These things seem unrelated—experienced people are allowed to have fun too. I don't see how this correlates with lack of experience at all. This just speaks to your personal bias against having fun.

What does this even mean? Each frame will be associated with some declaration of the contents of the scene and AI will just estimate the render without involving a physically-based rendering pipeline?

This would be true if we could exclude commercial results. SEO is absolutely destroying search quality.