<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: NewEntryHN</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=NewEntryHN</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 14:37:30 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=NewEntryHN" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by NewEntryHN in "Anthropic S-1"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The filing indicates they are profitable...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 23:51:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50252842</link><dc:creator>NewEntryHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50252842</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50252842</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by NewEntryHN in "No Need for Retirement When Utopia Is Around the Corner"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Am I the only one who think that we are overestimating the hindsight of "AI insiders" in comparison to the rest of the world?<p>It seems that they themselves are discovering the capabilities of models purely empirically by training them, and just have a few months head start before they release the model and everyone else can witness those same capabilities.<p>What do they have that make their multi-years (if not multi-decades) predictions more insightful than any other observer?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 15:24:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50210622</link><dc:creator>NewEntryHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50210622</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50210622</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by NewEntryHN in "There isn't an easy exploit for this PHP vulnerability"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> The Calif one is the most detailed. Also, no one used Claude.<p>be me<p>click link<p>typical ai-designed 
website</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 06:46:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50192028</link><dc:creator>NewEntryHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50192028</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50192028</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by NewEntryHN in "The AI Race Just Got Awkward"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> So the Chinese labs have thrown a lifeline to the Western loss-making labs, and I just have no clue as to why.<p>Because contrarily to the author's assumption, all labs, Western or not, have sufficient skills to discover the optimizations anyway, and publishing or not is not actually that important?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 16:37:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49911158</link><dc:creator>NewEntryHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49911158</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49911158</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by NewEntryHN in "Rails World 2026 Opening Keynote [video]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Good. We need AI-bullish folks to test it boldly and then report whether it works or not.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 16:19:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49846568</link><dc:creator>NewEntryHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49846568</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49846568</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by NewEntryHN in "Navier-Stokes – Tristan Buckmaster [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is hard to argue without a fine understanding of how much insight OpenAI had about the stab at the problem from the "public rumor" alone.<p>If there was any sort of coarse insight that "they're trying to solve it this way", then both those things can be true:<p>- The massive amount of compute from OpenAI re-discovering Buckmaster's work solely from the coarse insight (and solving the rest as well).<p>- OpenAI still acknowledging they basically scooped the coarse insight using compute, and they're willing to credit Buckmaster.<p>Buckmaster says "Concretely, what Levent and I did was to take the Cordoba and Martinez-Zoroa program, which achieved blowup results with rough forcing, and, with a great deal of help from LLMs, push it to smooth forcing and to the incompressible Euler equations".<p>Could that simply be the prompt they used at OpenAI? How "stolen" would the proof be in that case?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 15:31:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49628233</link><dc:creator>NewEntryHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49628233</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49628233</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by NewEntryHN in "Position: LLMs Can't Jump"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You don't need any reproduction. Assuming researchers are using LLMs, you should just see the number of jumps increase as models get better.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 17:48:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49186328</link><dc:creator>NewEntryHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49186328</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49186328</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by NewEntryHN in "What's the largest software project AI can complete on its own?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> without access to the original source code<p>All models in the leaderboard probably have had access to the original source code in their training data.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 17:54:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49159210</link><dc:creator>NewEntryHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49159210</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49159210</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by NewEntryHN in "Prompt Injection as Role Confusion"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm not sure I understand how important "role perception" is when following instructions from a tool call rather than the user is currently a legitimate use-case (applying steps from documentation, or shell command instructions on stdout, or really anything that can be deduced from the content of a tool call).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 19:33:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48634921</link><dc:creator>NewEntryHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48634921</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48634921</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by NewEntryHN in "How many of the 170k English words do you know?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Very easy for French speakers ahah</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48607276</link><dc:creator>NewEntryHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48607276</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48607276</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by NewEntryHN in "You weren't meant to have a boss (2008)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Maybe shadow hierarchy are still more productive than official ones? Looks like something that wouldn't have that many meetings.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 17:52:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347894</link><dc:creator>NewEntryHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347894</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347894</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by NewEntryHN in "Show HN: I made an emergency page for my family"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hmm I'm not sure why in an emergency situation accessing a webpage would be easier than making a phone call.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 16:45:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48296892</link><dc:creator>NewEntryHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48296892</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48296892</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by NewEntryHN in "It is time to give up the dualism introduced by the debate on consciousness"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If the thing "outside of reality" ever reveals useful to explain anything about reality, then it becomes part of reality.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 20:09:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48184884</link><dc:creator>NewEntryHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48184884</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48184884</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by NewEntryHN in "Newton's law of gravity passes its biggest test"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think OP's question is more how could Newton's law "pass" a test any more than General Relativity would, considering that it's merely an edge case of GR?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:01:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48010416</link><dc:creator>NewEntryHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48010416</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48010416</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by NewEntryHN in "Newton's law of gravity passes its biggest test"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why is the article titled "Newton's law of gravity passes its biggest test" if it doesn't explain the movement more than MOND?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 15:59:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48010385</link><dc:creator>NewEntryHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48010385</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48010385</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by NewEntryHN in "Alignment whack-a-mole: Finetuning activates recall of copyrighted books in LLMs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You are comparing the fight between a p2p program and the entire music industry with the fight between the entire LLM industry and a newspaper. Notice how the order seems inconsistent.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:47:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47960216</link><dc:creator>NewEntryHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47960216</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47960216</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by NewEntryHN in "OpenAI ad partner now selling ChatGPT ad placements based on “prompt relevance”"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ads are for the free tier.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 23:13:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47842329</link><dc:creator>NewEntryHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47842329</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47842329</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by NewEntryHN in "SQLite in Production: Lessons from Running a Store on a Single File"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's a spectrum. Installing Postgres locally is not 100% future-proofing since you'll still need to migrate your local Postgres to a central Postres. Using Sqlite is not 0% future-proofing since it's still using the SQL standard.<p>If the only argument for a piece of tech in comparison to another one is "future-proofing", that's pretty much acknowledging the other one is simpler to setup and maintain.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 15:36:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47676982</link><dc:creator>NewEntryHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47676982</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47676982</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by NewEntryHN in "Post Mortem: axios NPM supply chain compromise"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>He says it mimicks what is described here: <a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/unc1069-targets-cryptocurrency-ai-social-engineering" rel="nofollow">https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/unc...</a><p>Which is basically phishing:<p>> The meeting link itself directed to a spoofed Zoom meeting that was hosted on the threat actor's infrastructure, zoom[.]uswe05[.]us.<p>> Once in the "meeting," the fake video call facilitated a ruse that gave the impression to the end user that they were experiencing audio issues.<p>> The recovered web page provided two sets of commands to be run for "troubleshooting": one for macOS systems, and one for Windows systems. Embedded within the string of commands was a single command that initiated the infection chain.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 08:26:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637086</link><dc:creator>NewEntryHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637086</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637086</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by NewEntryHN in "Astral to Join OpenAI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nothing worse than what would have happened to the Astral team if they had ran out of funding rounds without an exit...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 09:35:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47452360</link><dc:creator>NewEntryHN</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47452360</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47452360</guid></item></channel></rss>