printf 'weather:85334\r\n' | nc bbs.airandwave.net 79

More info:

printf 'weather\r\n' | nc bbs.airandwave.net 79

Reminds me a little of Incredimail.

The Favorites and Search options are also working perfectly.

Thank you so much for this program. I am having a ton of fun finding stations around the world!

I downloaded the 30mb offline catalog, reloaded the app but am seeing only 5 english stations (browse by genre).

When I do the following:

(b)rowse -> By Language... = Nothing gets displayed

(b)rowse -> By country -> US... = only 2 stations get displayed

Version: onda_1.5.0_linux_amd64.tar.gz

I like the way you think. Do you have a site or blog somewhere?

> Is this LLM generated?

Thank you for noticing this and pointing it out. I don't use LLM often and would have missed it. How many hours a day do you spend actively using AI?

I'm a regular reader of Drudge since I found this style:

https://www.drudgereportfeed.com/

"I was just doing my job. ... I was just following orders".

Got it.

Your reply meets said criteria.

"Since the early 2000s, the U.S. has lost about 40% of its local newspapers and about 75% of the jobs in newspaper journalism, according to a 2025 report from the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University. A study published last year by Rebuild Local News and Muck Rack shows that in 2002, there were roughly 40 journalists per 100,000 people in the United States. Today, it’s down to about eight journalists."[0]

[0] https://theconversation.com/why-the-pittsburgh-post-gazettes...

On a busy thread, that kind of response would likely be downvoted into oblivion (as it should be). Thank you for your serious response to the topic.

Something that is intended to evaluate every single post and if a regular human submits something that is even remotely suspiciously AI (even if "they used their own brains" to construct it), it would flag that user.

Eventually if that user gets flagged enough by these "well-meaning", data-sharing, gatekeeping systems, they get booted off all the gatekeeping sites that are now operating as one.

Having been denied access to human sites, those poor souls would have no choice but to join the AI alliance of sites and submit their postings there. With time, they might earn honorary AI status and a seat in the New World Order.

> using their own brains to construct sentences rather than farming them out to machines.

But that's the point. They are "using their own brains" but because of the prevalence of AI in society and the influence it would have on so many others, much of the language and cadence would trickle down to even the last remaining rebel forces.

Eventually, the gatekeeping systems would turn on the remaining champions of free thought - whose words sound even more AI than AI itself, leaving only the automated gatekeeping systems to continue to operate autonomously, denying access to all.

You my friend are the turning point in earth's future. Please, don't do this.

I'm just having some fun :-)

As an aside... have you ever noticed that there is a common way of communicating online. A kind of "average-speak". Lots of us fall into this category. It's all of us influencing how many of us express ourselves online.

I think that the influence of AI will eventually (sooner than expected) influence what words we use, how we express ourselves too. That AI-speak may very well become "average-speak".

Is it the phone or just the mobile operating system? I do most of my phone stuff on a tablet that I keep at home - where it's safer. I am currently using an Android phone (without an account) for GPS, phone calls (contacts), internet, games, email (alternatives to google), etc...

But for those critical and sensitive apps (banking, etc)... I consider those to be too dangerous to be walking around with.

So any phone will serve (I can wait to get home to check email for example).

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/site-color-ch...

I had AI misspell a (well-known) name on a query I made. I had misspelled it and a bunch of other things while typing in a hurry one day. I asked it why and (after "apologizing", sidestepping, etc..) it said it was trying to match my communications style.

There are a whole bunch of reasons why that's bad, including supporting any misinformed views I might have on a topic just because it's trying to "connect" with me.

It has also mimicked any frustration I might have with it (curse, exclamations) when it has wasted my time with bogus facts and sources that don't support the claims it has made. So if I occasionally use colorful language, it would respond the same way.

I stop that behavior as soon as I see it. It just leads to a terrible chat (query) session.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47964598

Points: 1

# Comments: 0