<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: OhNoMyqueen</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=OhNoMyqueen</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 21:13:51 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=OhNoMyqueen" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OhNoMyqueen in "Fastmail 30 June outage post-mortem"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They're still singled homed, right?<p>They just added redondancy to in/outbound routes.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2023 14:50:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36616848</link><dc:creator>OhNoMyqueen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36616848</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36616848</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OhNoMyqueen in "Turing Oversold?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>He's not oversold. His major feat (breaking enigma using a computer) is miscategorized into Computer Science, where it should be classified into Computer Engineering and Software Engineering, alongside other stars like Charles Babbage and Ada Lovelace. His second major feat (the Turing Machine model) is one stone among the many foundational stones of Computer Science.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2021 12:22:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28538143</link><dc:creator>OhNoMyqueen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28538143</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28538143</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OhNoMyqueen in "The grandmaster diet: How to lose weight while barely moving (2019)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's worse than that. The body doesn't like to lose supplies, so any calories burnt by exercise will be reclaimed by the body, which means that in any case (exercise or not) you'll need to eat less than what your body asks of you.<p>For some people this is cancelled by the virtuous side-effects of exercising, most notably sleep quality and low stress levels, as sleep and stress are the two most important levers on hunger/self-indulgence. For some others this is compounded by a conscious decision to allow oneself to eat sizable portions (or snack) to make for the effort, which immediatly cancels the calories deficit induced by exercice, most probably with compensation, considering how few calories are burnt by standard exercise durations.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2021 14:57:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28246766</link><dc:creator>OhNoMyqueen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28246766</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28246766</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OhNoMyqueen in "Psst: Fast Spotify client with native GUI, without Electron, built in Rust"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The Spotify API doesn't support private API keys, so you need to create your own OAuth App and then authorize it for yourself.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2021 10:42:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28208382</link><dc:creator>OhNoMyqueen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28208382</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28208382</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OhNoMyqueen in "For programmers, remote working is becoming the norm"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I believe that <i>face-to-face physical interaction</i> is a way more determinant criteria than <i>slacking off</i> for making those moments productive.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2021 08:27:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28153614</link><dc:creator>OhNoMyqueen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28153614</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28153614</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OhNoMyqueen in "WD My Book users wake up to find their data deleted"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Cloud backup is a stupid idea.<p>I don't know what you mean by "cloud", but an off-site backup is essential. Your home can be burglarized, or burnt down, or flooded. Basically anything you insurance covers for your home you should cover regarding your data.<p>> At any moment it could go dark, for any reason, and you have no recourse.<p>There is no difference between your backup going dark or your main data source going dark. The whole point is that the data is duplicated and the odds of both of them going dark at the same time is low. This only means that you should check your backup regularly.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 09:47:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27628815</link><dc:creator>OhNoMyqueen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27628815</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27628815</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OhNoMyqueen in "Git undo: We can do better"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The most painful mistakes beginers endure with git are irrevocable code removal from the current working directory because of bad usage of `git clean`, `git reset` (or `git merge` if you're brutish enough). This problem cannot be solved by using git, because git doesn't have any reference to such code.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 16:11:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27580591</link><dc:creator>OhNoMyqueen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27580591</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27580591</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OhNoMyqueen in "Equilibrium Effects of Pay Transparency"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Bargaining power is mainly dependant on offer and demand; it can be low, or it can be high, depending on how valuable you are to the company. Pay transparency will simply increase the number of employees who will try to bargain. I guess that if you're not valuable enough that could backfire for everyone. If you do are valuable the company will just need to pay.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:46:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27526653</link><dc:creator>OhNoMyqueen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27526653</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27526653</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OhNoMyqueen in "Don't Feed the Thought Leaders"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Great article. The only nuance it misses is that not everybody is aligned with the "desired project outcomes". From a business (and often management) point of view, the "desired project outcome" is a product that works according to the company's established standard, delivered in a timeframe that is reasonable according to the company's standard. There are some other outcomes' properties that are hidden by that, such as: How better could the product work? How faster could the product be delivered? How satisfying is it for people to create the product?<p>All those people with their wishes and throughts which bloat one single project usually have precious insights on how to unbloat the overall processes of creation and maintenance. It's of course impossible to fix it all in the span of a single project, but managing every project with the "it works and was delivered on time" mindset is the best way to tank the overall productivity of the company and lose developers, because you missed the insights they had about to improve what they do, and do it well, and do it efficiently.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2021 13:20:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27472928</link><dc:creator>OhNoMyqueen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27472928</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27472928</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OhNoMyqueen in "Developers can't fix bad management (2020)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The issue with this argument is that a significant part of the "bigger picture" is artificial bloat which emerges from the fact of having layers of management. Managers spend much time actually managing themselves. It's of course not all black or white.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27460826</link><dc:creator>OhNoMyqueen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27460826</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27460826</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OhNoMyqueen in "Ad tech firms test ways to connect Google’s FLoC to other data"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is exactly how FLoC is supposed to work, and this is exactly what privacy watchdogs have criticized about it.<p>The proper headline should be "Ad tech films test FLoC".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:50:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27460740</link><dc:creator>OhNoMyqueen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27460740</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27460740</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OhNoMyqueen in "Engineering a Chess Match"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thanks. TL;DR: chess.com is closer to FIDE than Lichess.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 11:59:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27446883</link><dc:creator>OhNoMyqueen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27446883</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27446883</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OhNoMyqueen in "Engineering a Chess Match"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thanks for the explanation. Do you know which one would be closer to FIDE or club ratings?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 09:11:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27445844</link><dc:creator>OhNoMyqueen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27445844</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27445844</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OhNoMyqueen in "Engineering a Chess Match"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm shoked by Lichess ratings. The graph indicates that 1380 Elo ranks you above 36% of Rapid players. On chess.com, 1200 Elo ranks you above 80% of Rapid players.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 08:31:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27445572</link><dc:creator>OhNoMyqueen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27445572</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27445572</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OhNoMyqueen in "Wikipedia is swimming in money–why is it begging people to donate?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's also not specific to non-profits.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2021 12:13:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27343243</link><dc:creator>OhNoMyqueen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27343243</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27343243</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OhNoMyqueen in "Wikipedia is swimming in money–why is it begging people to donate?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think it was bad wording. Those salaries are sky-high, but they're about average for those kinds of positions.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2021 12:11:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27343227</link><dc:creator>OhNoMyqueen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27343227</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27343227</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OhNoMyqueen in "Sublime Text 4"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I love their philosophy of ever improving performance and memory usage. Sublime is one of the last gem resisting Wirth's Law.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2021 08:23:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27231665</link><dc:creator>OhNoMyqueen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27231665</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27231665</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OhNoMyqueen in "Positions chess engines don't understand"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> When watching the WC games, I've seen it happen that a move wasn't considered as a top move by the engine, but once played the engine realizes it's actually crushing.<p>You don't need to watch WC game to witness that. Any position sharp enough will have swinging evaluations at the search horizon, and even amateurs can find a twist in their favor if they're lucky enough (to have their 8-moves ahead flash of genius actually work 20 moves ahead by complete chance).<p>In decent engines the heuristics used to prune the search tree range from exact (e.g. alpha-beta prunning) to conservatively innexact (low chance to actually miss something), and unless you find a systematic winning or drawing pattern (like the examples in OP's article), you can't beat the engine with your "intuition".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2021 10:47:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27193077</link><dc:creator>OhNoMyqueen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27193077</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27193077</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OhNoMyqueen in "Positions chess engines don't understand"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Was it actually configured with "no draw" policy? The chess.com explains that Rybka thinks it's winning because of material advantage.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2021 10:26:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27192971</link><dc:creator>OhNoMyqueen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27192971</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27192971</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OhNoMyqueen in "Ask HN: How can I read faster?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My experience to increase book bandwidth is to read more, not to read faster. That is, allocate more time of the day to reading.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2021 09:33:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27104242</link><dc:creator>OhNoMyqueen</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27104242</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27104242</guid></item></channel></rss>