Hacker News: OkWing99

New comment by OkWing99 in "OpenAI breaches Medicare, Albanese reveals"

OkWing99 — Wed, 23 Sep 2026 23:14:54 +0000

So this is not different than people who share Google drive docs with company data with public links. It's not a fault of OpenAI or any other company. With enough time even your laptop can do it. How do they 'know' OpenAI breached? Maybe someone had an agent running asking to do a scan on any public docs?

New comment by OkWing99 in "Terafab"

OkWing99 — Fri, 07 Aug 2026 14:43:07 +0000

Site is legit - https://www.tesla.com/careers/search/?department=terafab&sit...

I wouldn't be surprised if it's another Musk pump-and-dump scheme for SpaceX. We'll be seeing more of these every quarter now.

New comment by OkWing99 in "Claude Opus 5"

OkWing99 — Sat, 25 Jul 2026 02:56:23 +0000

I think 'model card' should be a 1 page summary of key info. The report format should be something like a 'model data sheet' (like safety data sheets that you get with chemicals). 98% of people would only want to know the key info, not read a whole report.

New comment by OkWing99 in "Claude Opus 5"

OkWing99 — Sat, 25 Jul 2026 02:49:38 +0000

Dario Amodei is one of the authors of the paper. He used the same marketing tactic with Anthropic, and got flagged by US Gov.

New comment by OkWing99 in "Opus 5 is currently #1 on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Leaderboard"

OkWing99 — Sat, 25 Jul 2026 02:19:33 +0000

Ask anything related to practical applications for quantum-computing, or space etc. The stuff you can find on Wikipedia.

They were able to solve coding, but not what a real danger is.

New comment by OkWing99 in "Qwen-Image-3.0: Rich Content, Authentic Details, Deep Knowledge"

OkWing99 — Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:37:30 +0000

Some of it is a reference to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spider-Woman_(Gwen_Stacy)

(i.e. the porn references)

New comment by OkWing99 in "GPT-5.6"

OkWing99 — Fri, 10 Jul 2026 02:25:02 +0000

I used to have the CC $200 plan, and moved to Codex 6 months ago. I have the anthropic $20 plan + API billing for rare use. Use Codex daily.

Not having to deal with Anthropics constantly changing policies, token-gating, and carrot-and-stick marketing helps me to focus on work, rather than dealing with their company problems.

New comment by OkWing99 in "ChatGPT Work"

OkWing99 — Thu, 09 Jul 2026 22:19:17 +0000

I think their goal is to merge Codex and ChatGPT usage.

Why did they break a perfectly working system.

Instead of keeping Codex work isolated, now I have to deal with other constant changing bloat.

New comment by OkWing99 in "Claude Code is steganographically marking requests"

OkWing99 — Tue, 30 Jun 2026 23:16:00 +0000

Maybe they should try running Mythos to check Claude Code, given their marketing with it's superior performance.

New comment by OkWing99 in "U.S. allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI to ‘trusted’ US organizations"

OkWing99 — Sat, 27 Jun 2026 08:22:29 +0000

So what happens to their $1T valuations now, given they can't sell the product to consumers, and open-weight models are closing in on competition?

New comment by OkWing99 in "U.S. government will decide who gets to use GPT-5.6"

OkWing99 — Fri, 26 Jun 2026 07:20:09 +0000

Why do I get the feeling the administration is doing this to buy a position in the AI companies before they go public.

If non US citizens shouldn't have the models - wouldn't that cause both Anthropic and OAI to fire non-citizens?

New comment by OkWing99 in "Apertus – Open Foundation Model for Sovereign AI"

OkWing99 — Mon, 22 Jun 2026 03:15:52 +0000

I think US is the only country that's asked to limit their frontier model access based on the Citizenship of the user.

Let's say Gemini gets to AGI by tomorrow, will my Google account access, or Gemini apps access and data be blocked if I'm not a US citizen? (Anthropic did it with a 5% better model).

If US is classifying the model access based on citizenship, that's similar to treating it as a Defense capability.

New comment by OkWing99 in "Building reliable agentic AI systems"

OkWing99 — Sun, 21 Jun 2026 23:00:25 +0000

At this point, the papers, reviews and defense are all done by bots.

From the paper, "we collected feedback from 15 to 20 frequent users". Is it 15 or 20?

I lot of interpretive claims, it reads more like a marketing case study.

New comment by OkWing99 in "Midjourney Medical"

OkWing99 — Thu, 18 Jun 2026 04:56:05 +0000

For those who think this is a joke, there's no differnce between this concept and data centers in space concept, that's worth $2T. Both are not yet proven to work yet. At least they're not screwing the pubilc.

New comment by OkWing99 in "Anthropic flies staff to D.C. to clean up White House fight"

OkWing99 — Mon, 15 Jun 2026 10:23:59 +0000

Wouldn't it be funny if US Gov takes a 10% stake in Anthropic.

New comment by OkWing99 in "Anthropic requires 30 day data retention for Fable and Mythos"

OkWing99 — Thu, 11 Jun 2026 01:43:24 +0000

I remember the "Don't be evil" days from Google. At some point most morals change with enough money.

New comment by OkWing99 in "Claude Fable 5"

OkWing99 — Tue, 09 Jun 2026 22:39:53 +0000

It's selective reporting. Says 'in one example', but out of how many, is that one-shot, or is it a random result out of 100. It's a marketing doc.

New comment by OkWing99 in "Claude Opus 4.8"

OkWing99 — Thu, 28 May 2026 22:34:52 +0000

They don't test CC updates before release. The testing is done by their own team using the product or public feedback.

New comment by OkWing99 in "An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in discrete geometry"

OkWing99 — Wed, 20 May 2026 22:40:59 +0000

Says in the papers. "...which was first mathematically generated in one shot by an internal model at OpenAI, and then expositionally refined through human interactions with Codex."

Doesn't really matter the prep-work, what they say is it's a one-shot result, achieved by AI. The blog doesn't claim it was done by a currently public Model.

New comment by OkWing99 in "I’ve joined Anthropic"

OkWing99 — Wed, 20 May 2026 13:16:15 +0000

The question wasn't about the quality of the work done or a criticism of AI in general. But those were areas where people were employed and got paid to do a job. The output may not have been acceptable from Silicon Valley standards - but they were still employed and paid taxes.

It's about whole industries/sectors getting destroyed by a single company. 'Overhiring' is a result of changed business situations. Companies don't overhire hundreds and thousands of people intentionally to let them go. They hired to fill a need. Market conditions changed, competition changed.

Entry level hiring is mostly destroyed mainly because of Anthropic's messaging. Other labs don't push that hard on every vertical because they created a skill with some .md files - and pretend is a highly skilled AI.

I'm not against Anthropic doing it, I'm just saying what they're doing at the moment. Given enough time, Anthropic will be coming after every job that can be done by a computer - including yours and mine.