<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: OneManyNone</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=OneManyNone</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 03:32:51 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=OneManyNone" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OneManyNone in "Claude's Cycles [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That’s fair. Clearly Knuth himself thought it was impressive, that’s a strong signal.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 21:12:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47253905</link><dc:creator>OneManyNone</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47253905</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47253905</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OneManyNone in "Claude's Cycles [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Claude did not find a proof, though. It found an algorithm which Knuth then proved was correct.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 20:19:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47238356</link><dc:creator>OneManyNone</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47238356</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47238356</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OneManyNone in "I want to wash my car. The car wash is 50 meters away. Should I walk or drive?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The companies aren’t changing anything. LLM outputs are just more random than people realize. Run the same prompt 10 times if you really want to know how well they can answer.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 15:00:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47048210</link><dc:creator>OneManyNone</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47048210</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47048210</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OneManyNone in "Scientists working to decode birdsong"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Counterpoint: What progress has generative linguistics made in the same amount of time that deep learning has been around? It sure doesn't seem to be working well.<p>Also, the racecar example is because of tokenization in LLMs - they don't actually see the raw letters of the text they read. It would be like me asking you to read this sentence in your head and then tell me which syllable would have the lowest pitch when spoken aloud. Maybe you could do it, but it would take effort because it doesn't align with the way you're interpreting the input.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 22:18:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41909155</link><dc:creator>OneManyNone</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41909155</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41909155</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by OneManyNone in "Scientists working to decode birdsong"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think this is greatly complicated by the fact that the human brain has been "pre-trained" (in the deep learning sense) by hundreds of millions of years of evolution.<p>A pre-trained LLM also can also learn new concepts from extremely few examples. Humans may still be much smarter but I think there's a lot of reason to believe that the mechanics are similar.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 22:14:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41909114</link><dc:creator>OneManyNone</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41909114</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41909114</guid></item></channel></rss>