<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: Otterly99</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=Otterly99</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 03:44:50 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=Otterly99" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Otterly99 in "The Token Compression Illusion: Why I'm Skeptical of RTK"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I completely agree with this post. After I used it in one session of 300k tokens, I had maybe 3k tokens saved. Plus, if commits really are an issue for you in term of tolen consumption, you can always ask to hand over the reigns and apply the commits yourself as a rule (unless you're operating in a loop).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 05:30:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48595096</link><dc:creator>Otterly99</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48595096</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48595096</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Otterly99 in "Meta workers can opt out of being tracked at work up to 30 min"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sounds like you found peace. Good for you brother/sister.<p>What are your responsibilities at the co-op? I thought the idea was that people would work a few hours to get access to the product, but you said you work full-time.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 13:52:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398667</link><dc:creator>Otterly99</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398667</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398667</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Otterly99 in "Artificial intelligence is not conscious"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Which to me, raises an interesting question:<p>- How many individual components do you need for it to emerge?<p>Most people would be okay with saying that individual cells are not conscious, maybe even that tree are not conscious even thought they are made of many cells. Neurons seem to be the determinant factor in deciding whether something could have a consciousness, but again how many do you need? Does growing 1B neurons count as a brain if they are not organized?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 09:50:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396331</link><dc:creator>Otterly99</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396331</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396331</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Otterly99 in "Failing grades soar with AI usage, dwindling math skills in Berkeley CS classes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Maths skills have been slowly falling even before the advent of LLMs. I have a story but this is anecdotical so take it with a grain of salt.<p>I was in my 3rd bachelor's year studying physics (France) and overheard a conversation between two of my teachers. They were discussing how they should modify the 1st year program to now include math, because he had been noticing how more and more students were failing the more math-heavy subjects like body and newtonian mechanics. He said that they should now teach (or re-teach) calculus to 1st year students, which was not taught when I entered college (it was assumed that you learned it in high school and we would only cover linear algebra in 1st year).<p>I can imagine things are only getting worse with students that can now get under the illusion that they know math because they have a tool that can do it for them. Which raises the question: should programs adapt to this, like we adapted to having calculators?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 07:22:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48395268</link><dc:creator>Otterly99</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48395268</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48395268</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Otterly99 in "AI outperforms law professors in Stanford Law study"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There is also one thing I would like to add, and you can correct me if you disagree: coding benefits much more from thorough planning. Now, I exclusively work by first writing a plan that has well-defined steps and goals, which can of course change over time.<p>It seems to me like it would be more difficult to achieve with legal documents and, in my experience at least, writing a concrete plan has been the decisive factor that make my AI coding robust (plus all that you mentionned).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 12:50:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48383315</link><dc:creator>Otterly99</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48383315</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48383315</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Otterly99 in "Claude Opus 4.8"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I also find it amusing. I also heard a lot of "4.7 is garbage, everybody hates it". Shows you how important proper validation techniques are, not just gut feeling.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 15:20:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48324271</link><dc:creator>Otterly99</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48324271</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48324271</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Otterly99 in "Magnifica Humanitas"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Honestly, scientists too.
I did 10 years of research after deciding that it was not worth it. There is a vast amount of research with no direct application that gets published under the assumption that more knowledge is always better, but in my experience scientists rarely question the usefulness of their research (because most of the time, they find it interesting, which is motivating enough).<p>Granted, I am talking about harmless subjects, but there is also the dimension of resource usage that almost no scientist considers (the amount of plastics and chemicals used in biochemistry and cell biology is... concerning).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 15:20:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48295674</link><dc:creator>Otterly99</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48295674</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48295674</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Meow-Omni 1: a multi-modal feline LLM]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09152">https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09152</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48234894">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48234894</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 12:22:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09152</link><dc:creator>Otterly99</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48234894</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48234894</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Otterly99 in "Talking to strangers at the gym"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think it has taken a rather negative connotation with the development of psychology, marketing and "influencers" which are usually people that try to influence you to buy into something.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 15:02:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48023492</link><dc:creator>Otterly99</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48023492</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48023492</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Otterly99 in "Men who stare at walls"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I also immediately thought about his book on creativity. Thanks for the talk. For me, instead of staring at a wall, I just take a short walk. I think doing any activity with low mental load helps creativity.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 06:38:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47931097</link><dc:creator>Otterly99</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47931097</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47931097</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Void: A physics-aware video editing tool by Netflix]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://void-model.github.io/">https://void-model.github.io/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663784">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663784</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 17:11:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://void-model.github.io/</link><dc:creator>Otterly99</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663784</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663784</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Otterly99 in "Meta and TikTok let harmful content rise to drove engagement, say whistleblowers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's the same story since at least 2012. It is well documented in the book "The chaos machine" by Max Fisher.<p>Facebook employees, journalists and psychologists have studied the phenomenon and Facebook's (as well as Youtube's) response is always the typical "We have done something" to calm the protest, but it's never really the case. It's a constant game of deflecting, delaying, diminishing, denying.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 09:14:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47423387</link><dc:creator>Otterly99</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47423387</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47423387</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Otterly99 in "Mistral AI Releases Forge"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It seems to me that it is broadly the same thing, except they give you the resources to do it and expert knowledge.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 08:21:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47423055</link><dc:creator>Otterly99</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47423055</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47423055</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Otterly99 in "ATMs didn’t kill bank teller jobs, but the iPhone did"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I feel like even the phrasing of the original assumption that "we have more bank tellers now that we had before", which seems to imply that ATMs didn't affect or even boost the number of bank tellers is flawed.<p>If you look at the graph, the number of bank tellers from 1980 to 2010 went from roughly 500k to 550k (a 10% increase). However, the U.S. population grew from 220M to 305M in the same period (a 40% increase). To me, that seems to indicate that less and less people were becoming bank tellers after the invention of the ATM. Although from the graph again, you can see that the correlation is quite poor anyway.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 11:42:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47363105</link><dc:creator>Otterly99</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47363105</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47363105</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Otterly99 in "Malus – Clean Room as a Service"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not sure how that makes sense, it takes a third of the time, but you're only going 5 km/h faster?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 10:52:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47362728</link><dc:creator>Otterly99</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47362728</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47362728</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Otterly99 in "The changing goalposts of AGI and timelines"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thank you for the link.<p>I admit, my knowledge of reinforcement learning is a bit outdated so it seemed to me that it was unattainable for a non-specialized model to train efficiently on something like chess, which has a huge state space.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:04:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47351671</link><dc:creator>Otterly99</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47351671</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47351671</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Otterly99 in "Don't post generated/AI-edited comments. HN is for conversation between humans"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Every scientist I ever met (and myself included) has a backlog of papers to read that never seems to shrink. It really is not trivial to stay up to date on research, even in niche fields, considering the huge volume of research that is being produced.<p>It is not uncommon for me to read a recently published review and find 2-3 interesting papers in the lot. Plus the daily Google scholar alerts. It can definitely be beneficial to have a LLM summarize a paper. Of course, at this point, one should definitely decide "is this worth reading more carefully?" and actually read at least some parts if needed.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 14:15:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47350828</link><dc:creator>Otterly99</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47350828</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47350828</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Otterly99 in "I was interviewed by an AI bot for a job"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Some jobs that I interviewed replied with an automated email saying that, if I wanted, I could ask for feedback. I always did and none of them replied... This somehow feels even more insulting.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 12:30:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47349675</link><dc:creator>Otterly99</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47349675</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47349675</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Otterly99 in "Meta acquires Moltbook"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I tried it for 2 days and honestly don't see the usefulness either. Although, the big reason is that I paired it with Claude, which only uses the per token billing method. Here are the few improvement on a simple Claude usage:<p>- As you mentioned, the message bot thing was kind of cool.
- It can browse the internet and act (like posting on MoltBook, which I tried).
- It has a a permanent "memory" (loads of .md files, so nothing fancy).
- It can be schedulded via cron jobs.<p>Overall, nothing really impressive. It is very gimmicky and it felt very unsafe the whole time (I had already read about the security issues, but sometimes you gotta live dangerously). The most annoying part was the huge token consumption (conversations start at 20k+ because of all the .md files) and it cost me roughly $12 for a few hours of testing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 10:50:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47348930</link><dc:creator>Otterly99</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47348930</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47348930</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Otterly99 in "Meta acquires Moltbook"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is a typical evolutionary arms race, advertisers come up with better tool to fuck with us, we have to come up with better defense systems.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 10:33:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47348773</link><dc:creator>Otterly99</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47348773</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47348773</guid></item></channel></rss>