EDIT: Read some more into this. From Wikipedia and its sources:

> In 1969, Marcello Gigante founded the creation of the International Center for the Study of the Herculaneum Papyri (Centro Internazionale per lo Studio dei Papiri Ercolanesi; CISPE). With the intention of working toward the resumption of the excavation of the Villa of the Papyri, and promoting the renewal of studies of the Herculaneum texts, the institution began a new method of unrolling. Using the 'Oslo' peeling method, the CISPE team separated individual layers of the papyri. One of the scrolls exploded into 300 parts, and another did similarly but to a lesser extent.

> The results were mixed: one of the scrolls literally exploded (into more than 300 bits) during the "peeling" and attempts to put the scraps back together gave little hope for success. The second - PHerc.Paris.2 -, on the other hand, had survived in a slightly less fragmented state.

So this was new science being done on the possibility of unrolling the scrolls and piecing together information from the fragments. Whether the fragments from PHerc. 1667 was decoded I'm not sure. The work has been digitized (and photographed with specific wavelengths of light where the ink is more distinguishable), but I couldn't figure out if it was open to the public anywhere.

Another interesting part: > In 1756, Abbot Piaggio, conserver of ancient manuscripts in the Vatican Library, used a machine he also invented, to unroll the first scroll, which took four years (millimeters per day). The results were then copied (since the writing disappeared: see above), reviewed by Hellenist academics, and then corrected once more, if necessary, by the unrolling/copying team.

So it's not like they never got anything useful out of the scrolls but kept on trying anyways.

That being said I can very much recommend the two Hyperion books for a good look at AI and co-dependence in sci-fi.

Looks pretty good! It looks a bit like a dither, but with fewer artifacts. Definitely a "sharper" look than blue noise, but in places like the transitions between the text boxes you can definitely see a bit more artifacts (almost looks like the boxes have a staggered edge).

Thanks for bringing this to my attention!

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46702839

Points: 3

# Comments: 0

Also unfortunate that it's missing the RGB backlight of the Time 2. I can think of a few good use cases for it, but if it's only on the Time 2 that means fewer apps would use it.

    import math
    
    echo fcNormal
    echo FloatClass.fcNormal
    echo math.fcNormal
    echo math.FloatClass.fcNormal

If instead you do `from math import nil` only the latter two work.

Oh, and as someone else pointed out you can also just `from std/errorcodes import nil` and then you _have_ to specify where things come from.

I certainly hope this isn't the case any longer. As one of the moderators I feel the current group is very patient and welcoming. At least that's what we're trying for, no one is perfect so I'm certain you can find counter examples. But as a whole I think we're doing pretty well. If you have any specific complaints we would love to hear them. They can be left anonymously in our community feedback form, or you can find we anywhere in the community for a chat.

As for the privacy thing, I would say that I absolutely hate talking out loud to my devices. Just the idea of talking my ideas into a recorder in my own office where nobody can hear me feels very strange to me. But I love thinking through ideas and writing scripts for speeches or presentations in my mind, or to plan out some code or overall project. A device like this would allow me to do the internal monologue thing, then turn to "silent speak" them into this device to take notes which sounds great. And the form-factor doesn't look that dissimilar to a set a bone-conduction headsets which would be perfect for privacy-aware feedback while allowing you to take in your surroundings.

With this tech demo though it seems like the transmission rate is veeery slow, he sits still in his chair staring into the room and a short sentence is all that appears. Not exactly speed of thought..

And of course there is the cable running off to who knows what kind of computational resources.

The AI parts of this are less exciting to me, but as an input device I'm really on-board with the idea.

> Davidson was picked up by a lifeboat and taken to the Storstad, which survived the collision.

The actual meat of the article, doesn't have any clear source. I guess it might've come from the mentioned piece in "St. Thomas Journal", but it's not exactly clear.

Cool story, but not exactly the "How I solved a mystery" that you'd expect from the headline.