Hacker News: PashaGo

Clean build time is the wrong CI metric

PashaGo — Mon, 29 Jun 2026 18:12:43 +0000

Article URL: https://krabarena.com/battles/gradle-vs-maven-vs-bazel-for-incremental-ci-builds

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722929

Points: 3

# Comments: 0

New comment by PashaGo in "Show HN: Chess-Inspired Roguelike"

PashaGo — Fri, 26 Jun 2026 13:43:11 +0000

You should add a timer. Bullet chess is fun

New comment by PashaGo in "Google hallucinated that I am sponsored by Ground News"

PashaGo — Fri, 26 Jun 2026 13:30:33 +0000

Wait until LLMs is used for medical diagnoses or court decisions.

New comment by PashaGo in "Record type inference for dummies"

PashaGo — Fri, 26 Jun 2026 13:27:47 +0000

Anonymous records feel like one of those features that are obviously useful once you work with JSON-heavy systems, but surprisingly uncommon in statically typed languages

Frontend benchmarks need workload context

PashaGo — Thu, 25 Jun 2026 13:51:07 +0000

Article URL: https://krabarena.com/battles/react-vs-angular-vs-vue-for-dashboard-heavy-frontends

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48673399

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

New comment by PashaGo in "Printing Gaussian Splats"

PashaGo — Wed, 24 Jun 2026 14:53:15 +0000

Why it's called Gaussian?

New comment by PashaGo in "Stealing Is a Skill"

PashaGo — Wed, 24 Jun 2026 14:48:42 +0000

Most great products are nothing, but well-timed and well-executed stolen ideas.

New comment by PashaGo in "Statistics that live in your SQL"

PashaGo — Wed, 24 Jun 2026 12:56:19 +0000

Interesting, but I think it works only for quick ad-hoc analysis. For dashboards or deeper research, you still need other tools

New comment by PashaGo in "Europeans should learn to love the air-conditioner"

PashaGo — Wed, 24 Jun 2026 12:46:54 +0000

If you live by the sea or on a boat, you don't need AC

New comment by PashaGo in "Why eval startups fail (2025)"

PashaGo — Wed, 24 Jun 2026 12:40:12 +0000

Unfortunately, model quality is not the only criterion for users, and often not even the most important one. Adoption is also driven by marketing, UX, integrations, pricing, ecosystem, and a lot of other non-benchmark factors.

Also, model providers are not interested to have their models compared head-to-head under identical conditions. And “Model A is better than Model B” is almost meaningless by itself. Better for what task? With what prompt? What inputs? What budget? What failure tolerance?

It would be nice to have a place where users could run their own benchmarks, define evaluation criteria for their actual use cases, and make those runs verifiable by others.

New comment by PashaGo in "Show HN: Oak – Git alternative designed for agents"

PashaGo — Tue, 23 Jun 2026 14:16:20 +0000

Totally agree. I used to work with a team that built a project for creating ontologies of Git repositories. The goal was to help LLMs onboard faster and navigate the repo better.

In the end, it became heavy overengineering: people no longer understood not only the repo itself, but also the extra layer describing it. Meanwhile, coding assistants are already quite good at reading codebases directly.

New comment by PashaGo in "Who Does What? Team Topologies for the Agentic Platform"

PashaGo — Tue, 23 Jun 2026 12:12:05 +0000

It would be nice to see some metrics. I think the missing layer here is evaluation. If agents are going to produce applications, the platform needs not only guardrails, but public-ish evidence that those guardrails actually catch failures