Please could you try again but without the edgy vibe?

How do I get to a stage where I can just do math for the sake of understanding it.. to enjoy working on it.

I'm happy to "just do it" but is there some branch of match that might feel familiar and less removed from the real world?

Well done on getting through the courses.

I am one of the 3D modeler's working on complete anatomy and I agree, It's a nice demo but it feels half baked. There's no real love in it. I feel like so many of the AI projects are like that, shiny but lacking polish and love.

Something that's been written "well" shows that someone has thought about it, maybe reframed it some way or just done something by thinking about it for a while.

AI can think, but whether it's thought about something or not it's always going to sound the same.

If you are using it to help you think fine but I think it's about effort and I would want to know how much effort you've put in.

Harder to fake.

Well done.

(I'm not sure if this is what you were insinuating, but it would make sense)

Is it a skill for the layman?

Or does it only work if you have the understanding you would need to manage a team of junior devs to build a project.

I feel like we need a different term for those two things.

And then he goes on to win the Nobel prize because of it..

I think it's because we create a story about every part of us and our life. Every thing we do (sometimes we even do it after the fact).

I feel like those beliefs are what's keeping us grounded in the sense of understanding the world, of being in control. so it makes sense that we would start with them even if we are not aware of it.

And it makes sense that it's hard to let them go because without them you get a sense that you are just floating away and don't have any to "hang" your assumptions on.

You can reason a lot but there comes a point when things get bigger than you and you have to trust some other authority or just trust your gut.

There's not many people that could comfortably reason from first principles and be satisfied with where they end up. (I don't think I could do that)

"While FreeCAD technically does everything I need, the way it's implemented isn't quite to my liking. My biggest pain points with it are the modal sketcher that only works in 2D, no constraints in 3D for extrusions and the perils of referencing things in the design.

Solvespace on the other hand gets the workflow part right, but falls short by not importing STEP and the geometry kernel not supporting chamfers and fillets."

It's a very polite way to dismiss what I would say is a slightly rage bait title and write up.

And I couldn't agree more with the sentiment of self discovery.

I spent some time talking to chatgtp about the history of art philosophy and technology, as if we were writing a book together.

I found it was great to just get a very broad overview and then ask questions about the things I wanted to know more about.

Not a groundbreaking way to use an LLM but I really enjoyed it.

I'm going to take your idea of talking to it about books too.

Is there any other things about your life you would be willing to share?