What? Can you provide any evidence for this claim?

The exploit is already there whether or not you blame the cogs. Did blaming the cogs in this instance solve anything? Are disability benefits reformed in any way?

They are taking a position that cannot be argued against or even discussed because they don’t make that position clear.

There are many interesting ways that the conversation could have been carried forward but there is no way to continue the conservation as the OP doesn't make it clear what they think.

The only thing I can say is: No I cannot figure it out, please tell me what you're trying to say here.

This is unfalsifiable. Just say what you think it is explicitly.

We learned two things from this debate:

1. What most people hated was actually just “bad CGI”. Good CGI went entirely unnoticed.

2. A generation of people were raised with CGI present in almost every form of professional media (i.e. not social media). They didn’t have a preference for practical effects because the content they consumed didn’t really use them.

I expect the same thing to happen here. I don’t think many people want to consume AI generated content exlusively (like Sora’s app attempted). However I expect AI generated content to continue to improve in quality until it’s used as a component in most media we consume. You and I will eventually stop noticing it and kids will be raised with it as normal and the anti-AI millennials/GenX crowd will age-out of relevance.

I encourage everyone to read the original article and make their own conclusion. Do not take this poster at their word.

This is unhinged.

You are deliberately misrepresenting the situation. The journalists who block archivist traffic are not in any way connected to the blogger who was attempting to investigate the creator of archive.is. You have portrayed them as related in an attempt to garner sympathy for the creator of archive.is.

Here is an account of the facts: https://gyrovague.com/2026/02/01/archive-today-is-directing-...

Did this take place? Or is it just a fear of a hypothetical?

Why would I read your book if you have not read your book?

Edit: I now understand what is going on here. This is an attempt to promote Zenflow. The GitHub account (https://github.com/amoilanen/) is Anton Moilanen who is an employee at Zencoder, the creators of Zenflow.

The account (https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=jsontwikkeling) was created 86 days ago the same day as this Show HN post was created: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46290617

It would probably be worth the moderator's time to see if this post was part of a coordinated upvote ring as well.

What possible value could a comment from someone who has no knowledge of the site or conflict add to this discussion?

Can you provide literally any evidence that would suggest this is the case?

They didn't say this.