Is that even legal under Swiss discrimination laws?

Does anyone know what caused this?

It's no replacement for an in-person conference, but this approach is better than straight up cancelling everything.

This reads like a failing part on the organisers to manage such risk, and decided to kick up a stink about it instead of implementing a fallback strategy.

I work at a tech firm in India, and we are encouraged to create skills.md based on the traits of our colleagues, with the intention of reducing key personnel risk. A handful of engineers were let go as the result of a re-alignment, and their AI counterparts are actively maintaining their code.

I wonder if this is where they are going.

My current workplace is going through a major "realignment" exercise to replace as many testers with agents as humanely possible, which proved to be a challenge when the existing process is not well documented.

Keep up the good work!

GitHub Actions and Copilot integration are pretty much a staple at my workplace.

My current workplace follows a similar workflow. We have a repository full of agent.md files for different roles and associated personas.

E.g. For project managers, you might have a feature focused one, a delivery driven one, and one that aims to minimise scope/technology creep.

Right now it appears that most industry leaders have fully committed to AI. It would be foolish (career wise) to speak openly otherwise.

I'm interested to see how MCP and the development in AI will impact the CTF scene in the future.

The usage of generative AI has significantly lowered the barrier to entry for the creative industry, leading to an influx of AI generated products that are easily consumable and can be used to generate revenue.

Until the platforms begin to regulate AI art, which I don't see why they would, we can expect to see more of them in the near future.