<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: PrimalPower</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=PrimalPower</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 08:14:30 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=PrimalPower" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by PrimalPower in "Please Switch to Python. Or R. Or Anything. Just Not Stata, SAS, SPSS, or Matlab"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>baby steps</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 20:51:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48509312</link><dc:creator>PrimalPower</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48509312</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48509312</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by PrimalPower in "Doing nothing at work"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Exactly game theory is that is that everyone make more as a "Senior" or "Mid-Level" in a wealthy/successful org over a "Staff" or "Senior" at a poorer one with less customers.<p>Of course, game theory implies "infinite games" and of course the real world doesn't operate like that.<p>And large bureaucratic orgs collapse under their own weight, and the enshittification is the norm despite the number of paying customers.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 21:18:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48496558</link><dc:creator>PrimalPower</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48496558</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48496558</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by PrimalPower in "Dusklight – GC Twilight Princess Decompiled"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I love Twilight Princess because of this dichotomy. Yes it has all the flaws you have mentioned, but it also suggests at what a Zelda game <i>could</i> look like in an era where people thought that the Zelda series was Nintendo's competitor to games like Shadow of Colossus, ICO, Drakengard, Legend of Kain of the era.<p>Ultimately, Nintendo realized that that's not the way they want to take the IP. They wanted game-play to feel timeless and take a priority, and the narrative to take a backseat.<p>It's was definitely the right choice and revived the IP, but despite it's technical excellence and dynamic game-play I can not get into the latest entries.<p>It's a shame you did not like Spirit Tracks. I found the puzzles to actually be interesting and the boss battles to be the most exhilarating in the series - with a good soundtrack to boot.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 23:53:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48364106</link><dc:creator>PrimalPower</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48364106</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48364106</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by PrimalPower in "Beyond has dropped “meat” from its name and expanded its high-protein drink line"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There’s plenty of vegetarians due to ethical or cultural reasons that never acquired the taste for traditional plant based foods and are looking for a more substantial, protein heavy alternative.<p>Is it niche? Yes, but vegetarians were always niche.<p>While the late 2010s fixated on “protein” and “macros” - allowing products like Beyond or Soylent to shine.<p>Much of the health discourse around the 2020s has focused on quality of the ingredients and “processed foods”. So naturally Beyond is caught on the crossfire.<p>Is there a future where this stuff is proven to be better for you in the short and long term? I sure hope so. But there’s way too many unknowns right now and it’s expensive to boot.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 22:02:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47405554</link><dc:creator>PrimalPower</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47405554</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47405554</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by PrimalPower in "Auto-compact not triggering on Claude.ai despite being marked as fixed"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Garbage in garbage out as they say. I will be the first to admit that Claude enables me to do certain things that I simply could not do before without investing a significant amount of time and energy.<p>At the same time, the amount of anti-patterns the LLM generates is higher than I am able to manage. No Claude.md and Skills.md have not fixed the issue.<p>Building a production grade system using Claude has been a fools errand for me. Whatever time/energy i save by not writing code - I end up paying back when I read code that I did not write and fixing anti-patterns left and right.<p>I rationalized by a bit - deflecting by saying this is AI's code not mine. But no - this is my code and it's bad.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 20:34:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46737513</link><dc:creator>PrimalPower</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46737513</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46737513</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by PrimalPower in "Ask HN: How have you or your firm made money with LLMs?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yea, it's not not necessarily that the LLM itself is better at customer support than a human.<p>But i've found that it's just good enough that support and teams can handle addressing the systematic problems while the LLM deals with operational overhead.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 00:15:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46653966</link><dc:creator>PrimalPower</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46653966</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46653966</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by PrimalPower in "Developers Are Solving the Wrong Problem"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Guess who also benefits from well structured, clean, modular, well documented, and concise code?<p>Computers and LLMs!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 19:34:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46558157</link><dc:creator>PrimalPower</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46558157</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46558157</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by PrimalPower in "Claude Code gets native LSP support"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've been a JetBrains suscriber for a while, because at the time I saw that I preferred the UI experience over Jetbrains to VSCode. The IDE is well built, they have a better product/user experience team driving and coordinating those changes.<p>I cannot stand VSCode - even if I configure it to my liking I am unable to make it look or feel the way that makes me feel at home.<p>I cancelled my subscription a week ago. Yes I still dislike VSCode. But the same product Jetbrains has honed has struggled to integrate with AI agents as well.<p>I've played with some combination of picking vim/emacs with Claude CLI. I find navigating code a little bit slower since I have trouble building the muscle memory. I've always been big at using my mouse to jump around the file tree.<p>Configuring LSPs for these text editors and getting things to "just work" takes a little bit more time. I don't know what special sauce is in IntelliJ but for the supported languages, but it took a while for me to be okay with LSPs compared to IntelliJ.<p>But LLMs and Agents remove a need for a lot of the the advanced IDE features and I've found it better to return back to just treating everything like a text buffer again and using specialized tools to fill in the gaps that were missing with the loss of IntelliJ</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 19:41:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46368607</link><dc:creator>PrimalPower</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46368607</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46368607</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by PrimalPower in "Rue: Higher level than Rust, lower level than Go"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't need lower level than go. I just really like Rust' type system and error handling and I want it in a compiled language.<p>Zero Cost abstractions and it's memory model is fascinating - but isn't particularly useful for the part of the tech stack I work on.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 20:33:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46358707</link><dc:creator>PrimalPower</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46358707</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46358707</guid></item></channel></rss>