<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: Promarged</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=Promarged</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 21:38:01 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=Promarged" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Promarged in "Show HN: Extension to highlight and tag users on Hacker News"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://hnblogs.thume.net/feed.xml" rel="nofollow">http://hnblogs.thume.net/feed.xml</a> returns 500 for me :(</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 20:04:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17718966</link><dc:creator>Promarged</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17718966</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17718966</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Promarged in "Slack Is Buying HipChat from Atlassian"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sounds nice, too bad there are no screenshots so I can't see what does it look like without giving my e-mail.<p>Does it run on an open protocol? (Maybe HTTP or XMPP based?)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:16:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17624365</link><dc:creator>Promarged</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17624365</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17624365</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Promarged in "Address Verification and Full PGP Support"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> It has the advantage of not relying on the Certificate Authority system<p>I wouldn't say it's an advantage, while CA system has many flaws at least it's monitored somehow (for example via Certificate Transparency) while putting keys in DNS would require the app to validate records (does GnuPG do that?), not to mention the queries are not encrypted (so are visible to any hop) and could be transparently replaced by your government or TLD operator. Many DNS providers do not allow adding "exotic" records.<p>For further info see e.g.: <a href="https://sockpuppet.org/blog/2016/10/27/14-dns-nerds-dont-control-the-internet/" rel="nofollow">https://sockpuppet.org/blog/2016/10/27/14-dns-nerds-dont-con...</a><p>> and not requiring a full web stack (which some email clients and servers wouldn't want to open themselves up to).<p>Email clients and servers that do PGP usually have "full web stack" already to connect to keyservers.<p>Additionally while DANE or PKA lookups can be enabled in GnuPG only WKD is enabled by default ("auto-key-locate" is "local,wkd").<p>Nice nick by the way :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2018 20:07:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17612336</link><dc:creator>Promarged</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17612336</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17612336</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Promarged in "GitLab 11.1 released with security dashboards and enhanced code search"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Or cleaning up their work-in-progress, currently there are around 11307 issues open: <a href="https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues" rel="nofollow">https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2018 20:24:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17588742</link><dc:creator>Promarged</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17588742</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17588742</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Promarged in "Neatly Bypassing Content Security Policy"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Actually CSP can also block content modifications by extensions. I frequently get CSP reports from browsers using plugins that want to insert something on my site. Some time ago I also got CSP reports that indicated the AdBlocker couldn't touch the site too...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:58:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17513273</link><dc:creator>Promarged</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17513273</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17513273</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[CONIKS vs. Key Transparency vs. Certificate Transparency vs. Blockchains]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://blog.okturtles.org/2017/02/coniks-vs-key-transparency-vs-certificate-transparency-vs-blockchains/">https://blog.okturtles.org/2017/02/coniks-vs-key-transparency-vs-certificate-transparency-vs-blockchains/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17455886">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17455886</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 08:05:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://blog.okturtles.org/2017/02/coniks-vs-key-transparency-vs-certificate-transparency-vs-blockchains/</link><dc:creator>Promarged</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17455886</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17455886</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Promarged in "Google to developers: We take down your extension because we can"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> I was only able to get the situation sorted because I know people who work at Google on the Chrome team.<p>Hehe, one thing all successfully resolved issues have in common - a friend inside of Google. Maybe that's by design... Google employees are not friends with bad guys!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 08:01:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17455870</link><dc:creator>Promarged</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17455870</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17455870</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Random oracle]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_oracle">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_oracle</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17440094">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17440094</a></p>
<p>Points: 36</p>
<p># Comments: 9</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 08:27:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_oracle</link><dc:creator>Promarged</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17440094</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17440094</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Zooko's triangle]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zooko%27s_triangle">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zooko%27s_triangle</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17406546">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17406546</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 08:12:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zooko%27s_triangle</link><dc:creator>Promarged</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17406546</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17406546</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Promarged in "Show HN: Maskmail – anonymous email address service"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>33mail probably...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 08:12:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17398741</link><dc:creator>Promarged</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17398741</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17398741</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Promarged in "Some clients use SRV lookups, a few (to their embarrassment) do not (2009)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> put my own domain-specific CA Cert in DNS directly.<p>Remember that this allows any of your government or people controlling the zone to transparently put the cert there too. (For potential problems see [0]).<p>With the CA system (that I personally also don't like) at least the certs are logged in Certificate Transparency logs so you see any potential attacks.<p>[0]: <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2010/oct/08/bitly-libya" rel="nofollow">https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2010/oct/08/bitly-lib...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2018 07:56:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17390670</link><dc:creator>Promarged</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17390670</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17390670</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Promarged in "I discovered a browser bug"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Oh, I guess the vulnerability needs an extremely tenuous name and logo right? Here goes<p>I admire the extra touch here :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:22:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17364815</link><dc:creator>Promarged</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17364815</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17364815</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Promarged in "Dell XPS 13 Review from a lifelong Mac user"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> I recently sold an XPS 13, an i7 9543 model from 2015, which was the first laptop in a long time that I regretted buying.<p>I've got 9350 and it's also bad. Coil whine, one firmware update completely bricked it (fortunately was on warranty), "fun" with accessories (TB15 was a disaster). Would <i>not</i> recommend.<p>Actually it's only the NBD warranty that keeps me with Dell (used that and it's very convenient). Does Microsoft have something like that?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2018 20:46:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17315232</link><dc:creator>Promarged</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17315232</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17315232</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Promarged in "First atomic bet on Bitcoin Cash using new opcodes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper [0] (from 2013) linked from this article [1] was also executed on chain, see date here [2] and the actual script via API here [3].<p>[0]: <a href="https://eprint.iacr.org/2013/784" rel="nofollow">https://eprint.iacr.org/2013/784</a><p>[1]: <a href="https://curiosity-driven.org/bitcoin-contracts" rel="nofollow">https://curiosity-driven.org/bitcoin-contracts</a><p>[2]: <a href="https://blockexplorer.com/tx/7ae5760af2105a5ba54a914f188686e2743ead50cd690afb7e609f7b99e0ae31#o0" rel="nofollow">https://blockexplorer.com/tx/7ae5760af2105a5ba54a914f188686e...</a><p>[3]: <a href="https://blockexplorer.com/api/tx/7ae5760af2105a5ba54a914f188686e2743ead50cd690afb7e609f7b99e0ae31#o0" rel="nofollow">https://blockexplorer.com/api/tx/7ae5760af2105a5ba54a914f188...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 18:26:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17286950</link><dc:creator>Promarged</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17286950</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17286950</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Promarged in "Inventor says Google is patenting work he put in the public domain"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It reminds me of one person here on HN describing their interaction with Google w.r.t. their startup's novel idea.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2018 19:51:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17279861</link><dc:creator>Promarged</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17279861</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17279861</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Promarged in "Please, no GitHub (2015)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yep, your link is more relevant. There is also this: <a href="https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria-evaluation.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria-evaluation.html</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 19:37:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17274606</link><dc:creator>Promarged</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17274606</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17274606</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Promarged in "AMPstinction"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have to agree, Google gives new meaning to "open source". Open source as "we share some source but the actual meat is in closed proprietary codebase that you cannot inspect". I still remember the AOSP maintainer (Google employee) leaving because he couldn't do his work properly because of Google's politics w.r.t. Android.<p>Or was that the open source that RMS warned us about?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 12:25:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17264609</link><dc:creator>Promarged</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17264609</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17264609</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google/git-appraise: Distributed code review system for Git repos]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://github.com/google/git-appraise">https://github.com/google/git-appraise</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17245599">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17245599</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 09:30:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://github.com/google/git-appraise</link><dc:creator>Promarged</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17245599</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17245599</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Promarged in "GitTorrent: A Decentralized GitHub (2015)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>ActivityPub is indeed both simple and extensible. Perfect for issues and comments, also PRs.<p>For the actual code behind PR I would just setup a git daemon and reference own repo. With appropriate CORS the code can even be cloned in a browser.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 07:37:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17235639</link><dc:creator>Promarged</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17235639</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17235639</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Promarged in "Chezscheme 9.5 in Debian Testing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I see only SSL_ERROR_BAD_CERT_DOMAIN. (but on http it looks very nice)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 07:28:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17235606</link><dc:creator>Promarged</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17235606</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17235606</guid></item></channel></rss>