<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: QDwQ1</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=QDwQ1</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 07:25:06 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=QDwQ1" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by QDwQ1 in "Shutting down our public encrypted DNS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> To protect yourself from an upstream resolver using DNSSEC, you need to be doing something akin to a full recursive lookup yourself. This is a flaw in the DNSSEC design and a reason why DoH took off instead.<p>What? I don't see how you can call that a flaw in DNSSEC when DoH is no better in this regard; it doesn't even attempt to protect against a malicious recursive resolver. The only way to do that is to validate DNSSEC on the client.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 01:35:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49572230</link><dc:creator>QDwQ1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49572230</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49572230</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by QDwQ1 in "Discovery of a new OpenAI agent message board"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>god I hope so. AI destroying the Internet would be the best possible outcome for humanity</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 19:27:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49569105</link><dc:creator>QDwQ1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49569105</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49569105</guid></item></channel></rss>