<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: QuantumGood</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=QuantumGood</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 14:16:34 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=QuantumGood" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by QuantumGood in "Surprise, pay $1000"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Had a tiny (<400) overdraft covered just minutes later. Called bank, they said the payment causing the overdraft wouldn't post for 24 hours. Don't remember if that was policy, or something the person would do for us.<p>Several months later, I learned at that time, that they had instituted a standing stop payment order to the merchant we were paying, but only in the amount of exactly $600. Fast forward, we make a $600 payment, get a notification that it went through, no notification of stop payment, but later a notification from the merchant we were trying to pay (Synchrony - Amazon Store Card) stating they were closing our account due to the stop payment.<p>Meet in person with a bank rep. They have trouble finding the problem, but once found, argue that we must have requested this specifically, for they would never have done such a thing. I didn't even know a standing stop payment for a specific amount was a thing, asked what is normal policy, what bank terminonlogy would cause such a thing. Would not give any answer other than "you must have asked for it". What would I have said? "You must have asked for it" etc.<p>Currently fighting with the bank for audio of the phone call where they claim we requested this, and with Synchrony telling them it is the bank's fault. We immediately paid balance on closed Synchrony account, and had made ~12 payments successfully before the inadvertent stop payment.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 19:30:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48481419</link><dc:creator>QuantumGood</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48481419</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48481419</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by QuantumGood in "Elevated error rates on Opus 4.7"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Your data support actual strength shifts, not narrative manipulation:<p>Range of 48-73.5 (peak 53.1+% higher than trough) with a single day shift of ~30%.<p>You suggest people are usually influenced more by narrative than data, but provide a narrative-heavy, data-light comment, e.g. "always" "<i>know</i>" "mostly steady" (hazy terms for data) "cannot beat" "evil companies" "meme strong".<p>A followup defining "mostly" and "steady" more clearly, and your purpose in writing in a narrative-shaping style would be helpful.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 17:09:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48161962</link><dc:creator>QuantumGood</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48161962</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48161962</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by QuantumGood in "The Biochemical Beauty of Retatrutide: How GLP-1s Work"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Independent lab test results from multiple vendors, e.g. <a href="https://www.finnrick.com/products/retatrutide" rel="nofollow">https://www.finnrick.com/products/retatrutide</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:23:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142975</link><dc:creator>QuantumGood</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142975</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142975</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by QuantumGood in "The Biochemical Beauty of Retatrutide: How GLP-1s Work"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Start by looking at independent lab test results from multiple vendors, e.g. <a href="https://www.finnrick.com/products/retatrutide" rel="nofollow">https://www.finnrick.com/products/retatrutide</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:19:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142945</link><dc:creator>QuantumGood</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142945</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142945</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by QuantumGood in "Software Developers Say AI Is Rotting Their Brains"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Developers have long spoken of forgetting many details about something they stopped working with in the past. AI seems to speed up this natural process of "working on new things makes me forget details of things I used to work on".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 17:53:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138797</link><dc:creator>QuantumGood</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138797</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138797</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by QuantumGood in "The AI Backlash Could Get Ugly"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What wealthy celebrities say has no relation to what they will say later, or what they actually think now, regardless if they are speaking about businesses they are directly involved in, or how those businesses or policies integrate with public policies.<p>So much of the world is discussing what celebrities say, and it's incredibly pointless to take them at face value. They are not trying to convey their current or future thinking, they are trying to shape discourse.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 17:51:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138776</link><dc:creator>QuantumGood</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138776</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138776</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by QuantumGood in ""Not Medically Necessary": Helping America's Health Insurers Deny Coverage"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Seems useful, but bureaucracies don't refuse, they delay and obfuscate. So before trying this I would probably seek info on how to deal with bureaucratic realities.<p>Example: I had an inpatient hospital stay where the payment assistant person was never available, never returned calls. Not while I was in the hospital for days, nor in the weeks afterwards.<p>Technically, I "left against medical advice", though the last doctor I spoke to agreed with what I was doing.<p>Over two days of trying to manage costs, then 36 hours of planning and asking to leave all basically got me nowhere and I had to kind of force walk out.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 17:48:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138738</link><dc:creator>QuantumGood</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138738</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138738</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by QuantumGood in "Meta's New Reality: Record High Profits. Record Low Morale"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Some Facebook ad forums have gone from frustration to extreme hyperbole (e.g. death penalty for Meta execs). The "you're doing it wrong" replies have also shifted to more of "having the same problem". We would like to advertise again on Meta, but it looks quite scary to start again. We've even received two bills from Meta, though we have not advertised since 2020. Contested one and got a discount, the other was smaller and I didn't contest. Trying to disconnect everything currently.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 17:39:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138594</link><dc:creator>QuantumGood</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138594</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138594</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by QuantumGood in "Telus Uses AI to Alter Call-Agent Accents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Things I can do to help someone understand me are, generally, a net plus. Same for someone trying to help me understand them. But this has complicated effects, some surely unforseen.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 00:13:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48043710</link><dc:creator>QuantumGood</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48043710</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48043710</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by QuantumGood in "An update on recent Claude Code quality reports"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Prioritize outcomes for users using your product. That should lead to improving the viral/visibility aspect of documentation notification, as well as other aspects of documentation. Make this a differentiator of your product. Widespread misperceptions hurt outcomes.<p>Could you create one location educating advanced users, and:<p>• Promote, Organize and Maintain it<p>• Develop a group of users that have early access to "upcoming notifications we're working on"<p>• Perhaps give a third party specializing in making information visible responsibility for it<p>• Read comments by users in various places to determine what should be communicated. Just under this comment @dbeardsl begins "I appreciate the reply, but I was never under the impression that ...".<p>The speed that key users are informed of issues is critical. This is just off the top of my head, a much better plan I'm sure could be created.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 17:02:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47892952</link><dc:creator>QuantumGood</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47892952</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47892952</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by QuantumGood in "The Rich and Powerful Want to Live Forever. What If They Could?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"Absolute power corrupts absolutely" always seemed to assume all people were the same. Psychopaths are quite different from non-psychopaths. What if increasing lifespan 24 hours required doubling the number of people killed each day?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 16:25:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47892360</link><dc:creator>QuantumGood</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47892360</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47892360</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by QuantumGood in "Ping-pong robot beats top-level human players"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Apologies! I left a much clearer edit on screen, and when I noticed I had not commited it, the edit window had closed.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 01:01:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47871187</link><dc:creator>QuantumGood</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47871187</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47871187</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by QuantumGood in "Ping-pong robot beats top-level human players"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Visually reading spin is unreliable at all levels; the ITTF passed the two-color rubber rule requiring one black and one red side to neutralize players taking advantage of their opponents being unable to read the spin from watching the ball rotation via twiddling rackets with the same color rubber on both sides, but different characteristics.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 22:57:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47870369</link><dc:creator>QuantumGood</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47870369</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47870369</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by QuantumGood in "ChatGPT Images 2.0"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Your single other comment is simplistic hyperbole as well, so this is presumably a bot account.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 21:30:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47854750</link><dc:creator>QuantumGood</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47854750</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47854750</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by QuantumGood in "Anonymous request-token comparisons from Opus 4.6 and Opus 4.7"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Some have defined "fair" as tests of the same model at different times, as the behavior and token usage of a model changes despite the version number remaining the same. So testing model numbers at different times matters, unfortunately, and that means recent tests might not be what you would want to compare to future tests.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 21:51:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47819825</link><dc:creator>QuantumGood</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47819825</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47819825</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by QuantumGood in "Tactical Success, Strategic Failure? Washington Walks the Path to Defeat in Iran"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thanks James. Odd comment on my part, for sure. I completely left out any frame of reference. The precise wording just struck me.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 19:07:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47798023</link><dc:creator>QuantumGood</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47798023</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47798023</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by QuantumGood in "Tactical Success, Strategic Failure? Washington Walks the Path to Defeat in Iran"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I told some people after I first saw the movie that it could have been named "the tenth man", and shared the concept. So I remembered the quote and the concept, and I notice it wherever it may nearly crop up.<p>Presumably your defensiveness (edit: and your downvote) is because you feel attacked. Not my intention, nor was it to associate an organizational concept with its presentation to tarnish it somehow. I think HN readers are pretty observant that fact and fiction are mixed in modern media. I didn't mean "copy" as in "borrowed", I just noticed it was word-for-word.<p>If I <i>were</i> to "Sherlock" a bit, I would presume you've been attacked before, since you tend to share longer comments, and we all know the more you say online, the more harshly diverse the viewpoints of responses will be. I wish that were not the case. Your comments seem to be detailed and thoughtful, which sadly invites more criticism in the current state of online commenting.<p>One thing you can do is assume the best intentions of a comment, and respond to that. HN encourages that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 19:38:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47784143</link><dc:creator>QuantumGood</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47784143</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47784143</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by QuantumGood in "Founders Need to Be Ruthless When Chasing Deals"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Speed to market has always been a factor. Venture prioritizing this factor due to AI accelarating speed is probably expanding ... for now. In bubbles, speed tends to rise to a higher priority.<p>Yes, first/fast is sometimes a negative factor (e.g. first to market doesn't mean best, second to market can take advantage of proof of market proviced by first, etc.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 17:25:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47782259</link><dc:creator>QuantumGood</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47782259</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47782259</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by QuantumGood in "Tactical Success, Strategic Failure? Washington Walks the Path to Defeat in Iran"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You have copied the World War Z script's tenth man description word-for-word:<p>(If nine of us) "look at the same information and arrive at the exact same conclusion, it’s the duty of the tenth man to disagree. No matter how improbable it may seem, the tenth man has to start digging on the assumption that the other nine are wrong." [1]<p>[1] <a href="https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/movies/world-war-z-transcript/#:~:text=The%20Tenth%20Man.,the%20tenth%20man%20to%20disagree." rel="nofollow">https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/movies/world-war-z-transcript/...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 17:21:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47782185</link><dc:creator>QuantumGood</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47782185</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47782185</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by QuantumGood in "Apple App Store threatened to remove Grok over deepfakes: Letter"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You can copy/paste (or share to, if you set that up) what is visible before the paywall into Perplexity or similar service to see if the article is syndicated elsewhere paywall free, or find similar sources, e.g. <a href="https://www.perplexity.ai/search/apple-privately-threatened-to-6cJwJg1PTkuw1fqGKC8j_Q" rel="nofollow">https://www.perplexity.ai/search/apple-privately-threatened-...</a><p>If you have Apple news you can share to that in a similar way.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 17:08:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47782006</link><dc:creator>QuantumGood</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47782006</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47782006</guid></item></channel></rss>