I also wonder if they'll ever find out who screamed "F*ing B*tch" at her in that moment.

Why would a trained officer believe that shooting at the driver from only a few feet away would have a higher chance of improving his chances against being hit by the car (which was already well in motion), than trying to physically move out of its way? That makes no sense.

But they are likely orienting themselves with GDPR and similar laws around the world, under which data exports and portability only include your own data, and specifically exclude that of other "data subjects".

This is one of the few areas where I think that GDPR may be too strict.

The data subject shall have the right to obtain from the controller without undue delay the rectification of inaccurate personal data concerning him or her.

Taking into account the purposes of the processing, the data subject shall have the right to have incomplete personal data completed, including by means of providing a supplementary statement.

https://gdpr-info.eu/art-16-gdpr/

Obviously if you change your email address, the old one ceases to be correct, even if it was correct before.

Otherwise everyday photography in public spaces would become legally risky or impractical, especially in crowded areas where avoiding all faces is nearly impossible and where the focus clearly isn't on the individuals but the landmark or scene itself.

It was also a great way to read paywalled articles for free.

https://www.recipeninja.ai/recipe/r_0a8wYxMgm1zFSw/white-pow...

- No need to print/distribute physical tickets

- Check-ins via the app reduces the need for ground personnel

- They can push inflight menus, shopping items, promotions etc.

- Flight updates and other notifications can get pushed to your device

- Integration of loyalty systems like airmiles

- They get to track various user behaviors

Given that this product is apparently used to give people with disabilities a voice, that should definitely qualify. Yes of course they should be able to swear, just like everyone else.

I like how professional is written in quotes.

To say that the mp3-encoded version is not "what the artist recorded and wanted for us to hear" would imply that we can hear all sounds in the uncompressed recording.

The way the article is worded, it almost sounds like they were expecting them to work like mood enhancers. I mean, it's somewhat interesting that there were different outcomes in both studies, but it doesn't speak in any way against the use of puberty blockers.

Allowing insider trading would also incentivize leaders to make business decisions that primarily serve their personal interests, rather than their company's. They would prioritize decisions that create short-term changes in the company’s stock price, just so they can profit from trading on that information.

They can now just point to the developers: it's them, not us!