<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: ROM_Bombadil</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=ROM_Bombadil</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 19:55:22 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=ROM_Bombadil" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ROM_Bombadil in "The Generative AI Con"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> If you're writing some types of boilerplate or often-tutorialized code it can spit out something very reasonable. Other types of code, like say in game dev, it stumbles around and never produces anything usable.<p>This makes me think of a quirk I discovered recently which is that ChatGPT simply won't generate a picture of a 'full glass of wine'. It generates pictures with all sorts of crazy waves/splashes in the glass but the glass is always half full no matter how you prompt it.<p>I'm not enough of an expert to make any deductions from this, but I think it hints at what the limitations of the currently models are.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 01:23:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43097442</link><dc:creator>ROM_Bombadil</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43097442</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43097442</guid></item></channel></rss>