so I don't agree on the premise that it's "just a classifier". it's not something earth shattering, but practical nonetheless

/e: there's another post from sebastian raschka on this: https://magazine.sebastianraschka.com/p/classifier-history-a...

But funny that jev is getting its lunch eaten apparently in under two weeks?

They talk about astractions as if "requirements -> code" is the same as "Go -> ASM -> bytecode". Which is just utterly stupid. But downvotes tell me a different story haha.

I'm also management btw, and the two startups I am a CTO at all have clear buy-in from other C-levels that we can't just spam AI slop w/o reading it and hope for the best. But I do see that most probably don't see it.

Nobody said all of Europes problems. Maybe don't argue against a straw man you created yourself?

People chasing the absolute rational are in my experience numbing their emotional part because theres something they can't look at. Or people that chase success above all are driven by their "unresolved packages" as well. I'm not saying that any of this is wrong per se, it's not black and white. But it's the context for what people do, say, and think. They are human after all. We need to consider context and not only the idea itself.

I thought this was very clear already? Your link is "yet another cruel thing the gdr did" tho and is much appreciated.

lol. I was kinda excited to use it for AI-generated wireframes but this is such a turn off.

Alignment is "don't solve this problem without doing stuff that harms me, other people, breaks stuff or is otherwise unethical". I'd say alignment is the questions on how to limit the search space to what's implied.