After a U-235 atom undergoes fission, one of the outcomes is it releases Barium and Krypton (and some neutrons), which then eventually decay to stable/semi-stable elements. If one of those stable elements is common in the deposit but otherwise rare naturally, it would point to a nuclear reaction having occurred.

Also note that the U-235 decay chain generally looks different from the decay chain following a fission reaction of U-235.

For instance, if we're charting someone's body temperature, we would likely fix our y-axis to 80-110.

AI slop, I don't trust any of this article, especially the bullets on what made Deepseek "win"

An equivalent economic policy would be if Europe and India were both allowed to buy oil, but capped at India's current amount (let's say 20% of pre-war baseline). Perhaps this can be called a "fractional" embargo.

Is this really desirable? The pain of going from 80% embargoed to 100% is much greater for Russia than 0% to 20% -- a 100% would likely cripple the war. To be fair, not saying that was a card in play due to China, Iran, etc. But arguing it's good economic/diplomatic policy is unclear since it makes the embargo weaker

Because the projects that weren't built fast enough were eventually thrown away, meaning they never require maintenance, which is the source of the sampling bias you are observing. I've seen it happen in some cases (engineer with the wrong personality leading an R&D project).

I think what you actually built is a message queue engine that forwards the data to the consumers, not a load balancer.