But when a person expert or no uses an llm, information is being lost. If I misunderstand an llm's sentence, it is possible that "it knows what it's talking about", but with how frequently they don't know what they're talking about, I usually don't try and move on. It's not worth it.

In America, at least, though perhaps this applies more broadly, so many trends over the past decades all converge towards the lowering of the baseline levels of trust you should give towards a stranger (whether valid or not!). And llms have been a net-negative so far. We have exchanged some amount of trust for intelligence. And it didn't have to be an exchange.

I care less about llm disclosure and more about this: If you use an LLM for writing, please think sincerely about whether the output accurately represents what you would say and how you would say it to another person. Please avoid serving others nothingburgers and wordsalads. This has always been possible and it's easy to do it without realizing it with LLMs. The output can survive a scan, but dissolves upon further inspection.

tldr; make sure that what you publish is trustworthy.

Looking at her bio, the only family connection I can find is, "Proud Mommy". For a "happiness and mortality expert", I would've expected her to say more in her bios across her sites about her loving husband and children. I'm not saying she's bad, I'm just saying that it would be more helpful if she, in general and in this article, talked more about what she's done outside of being a happiness expert. Why should we trust you? How do we know breaking up with this boyfriend was good? Even a comment about how that freed her up to find someone else who was truly better and worth committing to would be better than just selling us on this breakup on basis of her feeling they weren't right.

(And to be clear, I think feelings here are important. You don't have to enter into a relationship if you're not feeling it. A subconscious feeling can be onto something long before your mind is. But I feel that once you're in a relationship that's that intimate, feelings alone shouldn't end it.)

> An opinionated comment or personal anecdote.

Counter opinion or added nuance. [1]

[1] A link for support or to demonstrate a counterexample.

It is also often a very bold claim to say "There is *no* evidence for X." The cases where you can truly say that are rare compared to how easily people (esp. non-experts) will say it. More often, it's more accurate to say, "I don't believe the arguments for X or evidence of X."

Claude 3 Opus: $15.00 (Input) / $75.00 (Output) per 1M tokens

Claude 4 Opus: $15.00 (Input) / $75.00 (Output) per 1M tokens

Claude 4.1 Opus: $15.00 (Input) / $75.00 (Output) per 1M tokens

Claude 4.5 Opus: $5.00 (Input) / $25.00 (Output) per 1M tokens

I will add this to my rotation.

Also, I love to see a variety of fonts and the WEB version here.

Thanks for making this!

10k/365 = 27.4hrs per day. Respectfully, I don't think the author has had almost 10k hours with Claude Code.

ChatGPT Advanced Voice Mode works fine, but Claude Voice is unusable, sadly. I'd rather talk to Claude! I would also like to try Gemini Live.