<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: Robotbeat</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=Robotbeat</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 22:07:03 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=Robotbeat" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Robotbeat in "The glass backbone: Why the Army's logistics will break in the next war"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nope. Technological possibility of landing on a droneship was claimed to be impossible. And yes, of course it was never actually impossible. The technical expert was obviously wrong even at the time, kind of shockingly so, but you see similar kinds of claims of impossibility today by so-called experts.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 14:24:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872344</link><dc:creator>Robotbeat</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872344</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872344</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Robotbeat in "FCC Approves Test of Space Mirror to Light Night Sky Despite Outcry"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Launching a gossamer thin mirror in space is not very expensive. Broad strokes claiming anything launched to space is going to be a more expensive solution has to level with the fact that GPS and quite a lot of telecommunications and Earth observation seem to have incredible leverage if launched to space instead of just using ground based solutions.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 14:12:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872254</link><dc:creator>Robotbeat</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872254</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872254</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Robotbeat in "FCC Approves Test of Space Mirror to Light Night Sky Despite Outcry"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nah. Should have been named after the Two Trees of Valinor, Telperion and Laurelin.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 14:09:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872232</link><dc:creator>Robotbeat</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872232</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872232</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Robotbeat in "FCC approves test of space mirror to light night sky"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>orbital mirrors make very poor weapons because Conservation of Etendue means you fundamentally cannot concentrate very high unless your fill factor is very high (which would require millions of tons in orbit). Lasers are far more effective as weapons as a single aperture launched on a single rocket is sufficient to get high concentration. Microwaves also.<p>The military application would just be illumination.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 14:05:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872189</link><dc:creator>Robotbeat</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872189</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872189</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Robotbeat in "Computation as a universal and fundamental concept"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes. Unable to edit it.
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landauer's_principle" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landauer's_principle</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 13:58:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872133</link><dc:creator>Robotbeat</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872133</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872133</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Robotbeat in "Computation as a universal and fundamental concept"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m aware of the von Neumann joke.<p>There is, however, a direct equivalence between them derived from the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landauer's_principle" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landauer's_principle</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 13:58:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872128</link><dc:creator>Robotbeat</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872128</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872128</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Robotbeat in "Computation as a universal and fundamental concept"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and the Laws of Thermodynamics are pretty d*mn fundamental.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 13:57:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872122</link><dc:creator>Robotbeat</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872122</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872122</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Robotbeat in "Computation as a universal and fundamental concept"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is a misconception. It’s more fundamental than that. There’s a fundamental connection between (Shannon) information theory and thermodynamics. The Landau Limit, whether blackholes can destroy information or not, quantum mechanics, etc.<p>Information is actually <i>tangible</i>. It’s not just an analogy or a coincidence that the word “entropy” is a word used in both physics and computer science (information theory). Thermodynamics, mind you, is perhaps THE most fundamental elements of physics and how the universe works.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 22:59:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48866407</link><dc:creator>Robotbeat</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48866407</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48866407</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Robotbeat in "The glass backbone: Why the Army's logistics will break in the next war"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Engineers became really jaded by Shuttle and the failure o X-33. Many of them, inappropriately, started claiming it was impossible. You still hear people claiming things are impossible today that are “merely” very hard, like full reuse, getting launch costs same order of magnitude as transpacific air freight, orbital datacenters, terraforming Mars, space settlement in general, travel to other star systems, etc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 22:49:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48866307</link><dc:creator>Robotbeat</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48866307</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48866307</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Robotbeat in "The glass backbone: Why the Army's logistics will break in the next war"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nah, it was everything. Everyone expects aerospace timelines to slip. That wasn’t the issue. I had an aerospace greybeard (guidance and navigation expert… nice guy, btw) from a civilian space agency that you would recognize tell me that booster landing on a droneship was “impossible.”</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 22:42:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48853388</link><dc:creator>Robotbeat</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48853388</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48853388</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Robotbeat in "The glass backbone: Why the Army's logistics will break in the next war"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That’s because there’s no political will for ground forces by the US because it’s a dumb war. If there was political will, then the area around the Hormuz strait would’ve been seized, as well as the nuclear sites secured. Carpet bombing, too, not just surgical strikes.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 22:40:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48853351</link><dc:creator>Robotbeat</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48853351</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48853351</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Robotbeat in "The glass backbone: Why the Army's logistics will break in the next war"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Having followed SpaceX since the beginning, this is not true at all. People doubted every single step. Industry experts did.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 19:12:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48850976</link><dc:creator>Robotbeat</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48850976</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48850976</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Robotbeat in "Dolosse – a South African invention used over the world"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Or composite rebar. Basalt fiber is sometimes used. Way cheaper than stainless and just as rust proof</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 11:14:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48816174</link><dc:creator>Robotbeat</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48816174</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48816174</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Robotbeat in "New AI tutor achieves 0.71-1.30 SD effect size in Dartmouth course [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ok</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 02:16:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48799986</link><dc:creator>Robotbeat</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48799986</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48799986</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Robotbeat in "New AI tutor achieves 0.71-1.30 SD effect size in Dartmouth course [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Wikipedia doesn’t make much money but is still helpful. LLMs don’t need to make a whole bunch of money to be helpful.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 19:31:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797218</link><dc:creator>Robotbeat</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797218</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797218</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Robotbeat in "Bring back crappy forums"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I actually strongly prefer to read such forums WITHOUT "responsive design," even on my phone. Strongly.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 18:03:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777942</link><dc:creator>Robotbeat</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777942</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777942</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Robotbeat in "AI can't be listed as inventor on patent applications, Japan's top court rules"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In January 2025. It’s also not a court decision, effectively an executive branch directive.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 16:01:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763514</link><dc:creator>Robotbeat</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763514</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763514</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Robotbeat in "AI can't be listed as inventor on patent applications, Japan's top court rules"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That isn’t precisely what was decided in those cases, either (even though this gets repeated constantly on the internet as if it was). Again, the fundamental point of this case (and some similar cases) is just that you cannot assign IP to an AI. It has to be assigned to a person.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 15:18:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48762959</link><dc:creator>Robotbeat</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48762959</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48762959</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Robotbeat in "AI can't be listed as inventor on patent applications, Japan's top court rules"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No. The court is saying you cannot assign IP rights to an AI, as this guy was trying to do. They are not saying it cannot be protected (as /r/antiai folk are always claiming). That’s another thing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 15:07:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48762805</link><dc:creator>Robotbeat</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48762805</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48762805</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Robotbeat in "AI can't be listed as inventor on patent applications, Japan's top court rules"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Because the “AI slop is uncopyrightable” people are misunderstanding court rulings like this. It’s not that AI output can’t by protected by IP, it’s that AI is not a person and so you can’t assign IP rights to it. You CAN assign IP rights to the human who did it (if they can show it’s non-trivial, like a haiku or photographer).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 15:06:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48762779</link><dc:creator>Robotbeat</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48762779</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48762779</guid></item></channel></rss>