Adverts are likely a poor business model here - if you want to sell to professionals and creatives, the visual look of the software matters. It should really be subscription or one time licence

"targeting" is a myth imo. If they even tried a little bit, they wouldn't have these problems.

his original requests didnt even ask for the subject line. he just wanted to see who emails who to make a graph of how the city communicates. instead they sent him the contents of the emails, including highly sensitive ones

Im literally at the point that my main discovery method for this sort of thing is word of mouth in real life. Everything on the internet is poisoned

I suggest you get a jetson nano instead if youre doing robotics or anything serious with an RPI.

If you just want a cheap computer, you're probably better off with a second hand laptop, probably cheaper too

Your point here seems to be based more on faith than anything concrete. It is a sibling with the idea humans have "immortal souls" and the like - something we would like to be true more than anything that actually is.

This being said, I do think AI systems are very bad at creativity. But I don't think that it's impossible that they could be, nor do I have any idea why, specifically, they are bad at creativity. At this point in interpretability research, anyone telling you they do know is lying.

This does not work on developers. Their empathy fails them here - because they absolutely would try a new product that takes weeks of practise. They like (or at least tolerate) learning complex+cool new things, thats why they are developers...