<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: SarikayaKomzin</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=SarikayaKomzin</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 18:43:09 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=SarikayaKomzin" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SarikayaKomzin in "Butlerian Jihad"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I highly recommend Erewhon by Samuel Butler. The author is the namesake for Butlerian Jihad. Interesting book in our times.<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erewhon" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erewhon</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 16:58:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50132792</link><dc:creator>SarikayaKomzin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50132792</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50132792</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SarikayaKomzin in "Butlerian Jihad"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>People find it easy to be Utilitarians when they’re in the greatest number, don’t they?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 16:50:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50132698</link><dc:creator>SarikayaKomzin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50132698</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50132698</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SarikayaKomzin in "Grieving the loss of details"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have crippling imposter syndrome. Using AI really aggravates that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 02:12:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50039145</link><dc:creator>SarikayaKomzin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50039145</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50039145</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SarikayaKomzin in "Grieving the loss of details"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I want to be intrinsically motivated too, and I am a good bit of the time. But let’s not pretend intrinsic motivation is an infinite well. We can suffer intellectually from a lack of places to socialize our pursuits.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 01:54:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50039056</link><dc:creator>SarikayaKomzin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50039056</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50039056</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SarikayaKomzin in "Grieving the loss of details"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> No one confessed the Machine was out of hand. Year by year it was served with increased efficiency and decreased intelligence. The better a man knew his own duties upon it, the less he understood the duties of his neighbor, and in all the world there was not one who understood the monster as a whole. Those master brains had perished.<p>- E.M. Forster, _The Machine Stops_<p>Abstraction is terrific and terrifying. It is the shoulders of giants we build upon, but when it begins to scale nonlinearly I fear it endangers us as much as enraptures us.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 01:42:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50039000</link><dc:creator>SarikayaKomzin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50039000</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50039000</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SarikayaKomzin in "No Man Is an Island"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Why learn to code at all? The computers can do that for us. And so the rigorous, systematic thinking you need to practice in order to be a good programmer: all gone. The machines can be rational for us. We can just vibe.<p>This is how we manifest Forster’s _The Machine Stops_. 
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Machine_Stops" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Machine_Stops</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 23:25:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50027833</link><dc:creator>SarikayaKomzin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50027833</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50027833</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SarikayaKomzin in "Solod: Go can be a better C"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’ve been considering using Odin and Raylib for this because of its similarities to Go, but using Go itself is appealing. Do you have any good resources for what you’ve learned, or is it an unexplored frontier?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 01:36:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48942453</link><dc:creator>SarikayaKomzin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48942453</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48942453</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SarikayaKomzin in "Show HN: Number Gacha, a gacha game distilled to its essence"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Reminds me of NumberWang from Mitchell and Webb’s skits.<p><a href="https://youtu.be/0obMRztklqU?si=CA5NWDE6FVSSM5Ih" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/0obMRztklqU?si=CA5NWDE6FVSSM5Ih</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 01:36:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48188215</link><dc:creator>SarikayaKomzin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48188215</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48188215</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SarikayaKomzin in "God Damn AI is making me dumb"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have the same feeling on the back of my neck. I think it’s born from my crippling imposter syndrome, which is maybe a super power now.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 19:10:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139833</link><dc:creator>SarikayaKomzin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139833</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139833</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SarikayaKomzin in "Setting time on fire and the temptation of The Button"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It’s an interesting exercise to contrast Dune’s post-Butlerian Jihad world with the Hyperion pre-fall world’s reliance on AI. They could almost be in the same timeline.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2023 14:34:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36185900</link><dc:creator>SarikayaKomzin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36185900</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36185900</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SarikayaKomzin in "Strava hikes monthly subscription price"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I quite like <a href="https://smashrun.com/" rel="nofollow">https://smashrun.com/</a>, but, to be transparent, I pair it with Strava.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2023 18:58:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34372252</link><dc:creator>SarikayaKomzin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34372252</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34372252</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SarikayaKomzin in "Netflix CFO has no plans for advertising but 'never say never'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Those dates are almost always not arbitrary. They're usually due to licensing and distribution agreements. Not trying to dissuade your from torrenting, but it's disingenuous to call those dates arbitrary. They're the simple reality of being in the content business, even originals aren't always fully vertically integrated, but that's certain the direction the  industry is moving.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 07:56:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30611989</link><dc:creator>SarikayaKomzin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30611989</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30611989</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SarikayaKomzin in "We shouldn’t push a positive mindset on those in poverty"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Aristotle had this figured out thousands of year ago
<a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-ethics/" rel="nofollow">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-ethics/</a><p>> At the same time, Aristotle makes it clear that in order to be happy one must possess others goods as well—such goods as friends, wealth, and power. And one's happiness is endangered if one is severely lacking in certain advantages—if, for example, one is extremely ugly, or has lost children or good friends through death (1099a31–b6). But why so? If one's ultimate end should simply be virtuous activity, then why should it make any difference to one's happiness whether one has or lacks these other types of good? Aristotle's reply is that one's virtuous activity will be to some extent diminished or defective, if one lacks an adequate supply of other goods (1153b17–19). Someone who is friendless, childless, powerless, weak, and ugly will simply not be able to find many opportunities for virtuous activity over a long period of time, and what little he can accomplish will not be of great merit. To some extent, then, living well requires good fortune; happenstance can rob even the most excellent human beings of happiness. Nonetheless, Aristotle insists, the highest good, virtuous activity, is not something that comes to us by chance. Although we must be fortunate enough to have parents and fellow citizens who help us become virtuous, we ourselves share much of the responsibility for acquiring and exercising the virtues.<p>Even the Buddha was a prince before he was enlightened! With all that said, while I agree with the basic premise of this article, a good mental framework IS an important part of becoming a fulfilled person regardless of economic status. Money doesn't correlate directly with happiness, but it does make it a lot easier to pursue happiness when you don't have to worry about it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2022 06:30:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30403697</link><dc:creator>SarikayaKomzin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30403697</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30403697</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Machine Stops [pdf]]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.cs.ucdavis.edu/~koehl/Teaching/ECS188/PDF_files/Machine_stops.pdf">https://www.cs.ucdavis.edu/~koehl/Teaching/ECS188/PDF_files/Machine_stops.pdf</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29051853">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29051853</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2021 19:57:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.cs.ucdavis.edu/~koehl/Teaching/ECS188/PDF_files/Machine_stops.pdf</link><dc:creator>SarikayaKomzin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29051853</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29051853</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SarikayaKomzin in "The myth of the myth of the lone genius"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As has been said in this thread many times, there is a middle ground here: geniuses exist, of course, but are not necessarily solely responsible for great leaps forward in progress.<p>What’s also worth mentioning is that geniuses stand on the shoulders of abstraction, the most powerful (and scary!) force known to man. The more and more we abstract away problems, the more and more geniuses can scaffold on top of that abstraction. This compounding effect is more responsible for innovation than the admittedly gifted and great individuals who channel it.<p>“If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants.” — Isaac Newton</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2021 04:24:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27613976</link><dc:creator>SarikayaKomzin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27613976</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27613976</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SarikayaKomzin in "Akira Kurosawa’s List of His 100 Favorite Movies (2015)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Solaris is a beautiful book. It’s a short read, too. I highly recommend it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:53:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26557191</link><dc:creator>SarikayaKomzin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26557191</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26557191</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SarikayaKomzin in "Why Read Classic Books?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The Lindy Effect[1] is a good answer to this question. In a sort of pseudo-evolutionary way, timeless ideas have a way of persisting because they are well-adapted for consumption no matter what the cultural milieu. There is, of course, survivorship bias to take into consideration, but I think this is a useful heuristic.<p>Not that I believe you shouldn’t read new books (because you should sometimes) but that would be a more interesting question: “Why should you read new books?” Because given the half-life of information/facts/data, it’s a risky proposition from a opportunity cost standpoint. You’re basically hoping the book becomes a classic — and therefore it has staying usefulness and that answers the original question on why you should read classics — or you simply what to be plugged into the zeitgeist for networking or other reasons.<p>Unrelated, I am always fascinated by classics, especially ones from antiquity, because they really demonstrate how very little we’ve changed as a species. The problems facing Seneca or Cicero and the questions they asked themselves aren’t all that different from the ones we have today.<p>[1]<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lindy_effect" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lindy_effect</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2021 01:21:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26372213</link><dc:creator>SarikayaKomzin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26372213</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26372213</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SarikayaKomzin in "Hunter S. Thompson's Irreverent Eulogy for Nixon (1964)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Very relevant on a day where people are parroting the “respect the dead” false truism when people criticize Rush Limbaugh in death.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 01:59:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26174554</link><dc:creator>SarikayaKomzin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26174554</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26174554</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SarikayaKomzin in "Why Content Is King"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As many have pointed out, this is an obviously oversimplified maxim. But I’d like to add two reasons why I think it is a useful heuristic despite that.<p>1. Great content can’t be commodified, despite the industry’s best efforts.<p>2. Content lives in extremistan. [1]. Though the average piece of content has little upside, the upside of a great piece of content is nearly limitless.<p>At the very least, content is a “prince” alongside distribution (network effects).<p>[1] “Taleb provides another example of Extremistan: book publishing. Suppose one randomly chooses a thousand authors, and adds up the total number of books they have sold. Now, add the bestselling author in the world, J.K. Rowling, the author of the Harry Potter books. Her book sales with vastly exceed the total of the other thousand authors.”<p><a href="https://people.wou.edu/~shawd/mediocristan--extremistan.html" rel="nofollow">https://people.wou.edu/~shawd/mediocristan--extremistan.html</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2020 18:35:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25479815</link><dc:creator>SarikayaKomzin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25479815</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25479815</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SarikayaKomzin in "Choose Boring Technology"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is basically the Lindy effect in action.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2020 18:26:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25325389</link><dc:creator>SarikayaKomzin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25325389</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25325389</guid></item></channel></rss>