<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: Scott_Helme_</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=Scott_Helme_</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 14:52:13 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=Scott_Helme_" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[No Hacking Required: The Manchester Airports Group Data Breach]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://scotthelme.co.uk/no-hacking-required-manchester-airports-group-data-breach/">https://scotthelme.co.uk/no-hacking-required-manchester-airports-group-data-breach/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49597239">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49597239</a></p>
<p>Points: 5</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 11:52:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://scotthelme.co.uk/no-hacking-required-manchester-airports-group-data-breach/</link><dc:creator>Scott_Helme_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49597239</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49597239</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Scott_Helme_ in "The most popular sites that still don't support passkeys"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No, it was more broad than just SE domains, but trying to detect whether a site is suitable for passkeys support automatically is quite the challenge. Some don't allow themselves to be crawled so require manual verification.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 08:13:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48656750</link><dc:creator>Scott_Helme_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48656750</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48656750</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Scott_Helme_ in "The most popular sites that still don't support passkeys"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm not entirely sure that it does, which bit of passkeys are you concerned most with?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 09:08:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48642277</link><dc:creator>Scott_Helme_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48642277</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48642277</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Scott_Helme_ in "The most popular sites that still don't support passkeys"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is fixed now: <a href="https://whynopasskeys.com/country/se" rel="nofollow">https://whynopasskeys.com/country/se</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 09:08:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48642272</link><dc:creator>Scott_Helme_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48642272</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48642272</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[The most popular sites that still don't support passkeys]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://whynopasskeys.com/">https://whynopasskeys.com/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48634184">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48634184</a></p>
<p>Points: 4</p>
<p># Comments: 8</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 18:39:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://whynopasskeys.com/</link><dc:creator>Scott_Helme_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48634184</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48634184</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Scott_Helme_ in "XSS Is Deadly for Passkeys: The Hidden Risk of Attestation None"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Interesting, could you link me to some of those sites so I can investigate?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 16:52:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48195900</link><dc:creator>Scott_Helme_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48195900</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48195900</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Scott_Helme_ in "XSS Is Deadly for Passkeys: The Hidden Risk of Attestation None"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I can kind of see it, but you can also just use an authenticator from any manufacturer, or have multiple types that you use? I'm just curious what I'm overlooking.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 15:16:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48194466</link><dc:creator>Scott_Helme_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48194466</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48194466</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Scott_Helme_ in "XSS Is Deadly for Passkeys: The Hidden Risk of Attestation None"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What's the concern with using passkeys?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 13:45:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48193237</link><dc:creator>Scott_Helme_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48193237</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48193237</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Scott_Helme_ in "What a year of solar and batteries saved us in 2025"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I did try to make it clear in the article.<p>We're powering 2 x EVs, have two adults working from home full time, I have a server rack under the stairs, and we have a hot tub outside.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 21:58:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46608854</link><dc:creator>Scott_Helme_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46608854</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46608854</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Scott_Helme_ in "What a year of solar and batteries saved us in 2025"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Absolutely — tariff choice, storage, and automation make a huge difference.<p>The article isn’t claiming this setup is universally optimal, just showing what’s possible when those pieces are combined and used deliberately.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 21:56:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46608831</link><dc:creator>Scott_Helme_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46608831</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46608831</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Scott_Helme_ in "What a year of solar and batteries saved us in 2025"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We had an expensive solar install due to restrictions around our roof, so the solar would typically have been cheaper.<p>Another consideration is that battery installations in the UK are charged at 20% VAT, but if they're installed as part of a solar installation, they're charged at 0% VAT. So even if your main interest is in getting the batteries, a small solar install might make sense because of the savings.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 21:54:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46608789</link><dc:creator>Scott_Helme_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46608789</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46608789</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Scott_Helme_ in "What a year of solar and batteries saved us in 2025"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The only restriction placed on you is the export rate, which is provided to you by the DNO here in the UK. We had a limit of 3.8kW placed, which is programmed in to the batteries by the installer.<p>Octopus also have more flexible battery export tariffs if you want to explore those: <a href="https://octopus.energy/smart/flux/" rel="nofollow">https://octopus.energy/smart/flux/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 21:48:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46608702</link><dc:creator>Scott_Helme_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46608702</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46608702</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Scott_Helme_ in "What a year of solar and batteries saved us in 2025"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nah, there's no Bitcoin mining, honest!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 21:41:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46608585</link><dc:creator>Scott_Helme_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46608585</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46608585</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Scott_Helme_ in "What a year of solar and batteries saved us in 2025"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>How did you know about my laser?!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 21:40:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46608561</link><dc:creator>Scott_Helme_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46608561</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46608561</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Scott_Helme_ in "Another free CA as an alternative to Let's Encrypt"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thanks! Sometimes the simple tricks are the best ones :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2021 17:02:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28248433</link><dc:creator>Scott_Helme_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28248433</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28248433</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Scott_Helme_ in "Another free CA as an alternative to Let's Encrypt"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There is no reason to differentiate between free certificates and paid certificates. The process works in exactly the same way for either.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2021 17:02:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28248428</link><dc:creator>Scott_Helme_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28248428</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28248428</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Scott_Helme_ in "Another free CA as an alternative to Let's Encrypt"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They're all 3 certificates long (leaf/intermediate/root) apart from Let's Encrypt which, due to their cross-signature, are 4 certificates long for ECC.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2021 17:01:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28248401</link><dc:creator>Scott_Helme_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28248401</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28248401</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Scott_Helme_ in "Another free CA as an alternative to Let's Encrypt"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If you were to use the same private key for the 4 certificates then you could seamlessly switch between whichever leaf certificate you wanted to serve to the client. I'm not aware of the ability to send multiple leaf certificates to a client for consideration though.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2021 13:35:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28245749</link><dc:creator>Scott_Helme_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28245749</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28245749</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Scott_Helme_ in "Another free CA as an alternative to Let's Encrypt"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Let's Encrypt can issue from an ECC chain, I've tweeted[1] the details on how to enable your account for that.<p>[1] <a href="https://twitter.com/Scott_Helme/status/1392101598852222976" rel="nofollow">https://twitter.com/Scott_Helme/status/1392101598852222976</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2021 13:33:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28245730</link><dc:creator>Scott_Helme_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28245730</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28245730</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Scott_Helme_ in "Another free CA as an alternative to Let's Encrypt"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If you get a 1 year certificate then yeah, but otherwise no. The requirement to re-validate the DNS record comes not from the CA or the use of ACME, but the Baseline Requirements[1] §4.2.1, to prove you are still in control of the domain on a somewhat regular basis to obtain new certificates. Every 3 months is more frequent than is required, but there is still a regular (398 day) DCV requirement.<p>[1] <a href="https://cabforum.org/wp-content/uploads/CA-Browser-Forum-BR-1.7.9.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://cabforum.org/wp-content/uploads/CA-Browser-Forum-BR-...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2021 13:27:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28245666</link><dc:creator>Scott_Helme_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28245666</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28245666</guid></item></channel></rss>