<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: SethTS</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=SethTS</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 04:22:33 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=SethTS" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SethTS in "Artificial intelligence is not conscious – Ted Chiang"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Are you familiar with Michael Graziano and Attention Schema Theory?  I think that is a better "substrate independent" formulation of the objections Ted Chiang is expressing here.<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attention_schema_theory" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attention_schema_theory</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 23:12:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48391368</link><dc:creator>SethTS</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48391368</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48391368</guid></item></channel></rss>