<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: SirLordBoss</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=SirLordBoss</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 23:22:41 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=SirLordBoss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SirLordBoss in "Kimi-K3 Technical Report [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why? Absolutely correct, especially considering the position of the person they're referring to</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 16:47:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49072279</link><dc:creator>SirLordBoss</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49072279</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49072279</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SirLordBoss in "Your brain changes based on what you did two weeks ago"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>To be fair, they're not exactly wrong. Worth repeating with N=10,100,... until we get a robust conclusion, but as it is, there's not much to go on in this one</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 19:03:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41791473</link><dc:creator>SirLordBoss</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41791473</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41791473</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SirLordBoss in "Avante.nvim: Use Your Neovim Like Using Cursor AI IDE"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The lack of an option on Windows makes it harder to justify when alacritty + nvim achieves great speeds as well, with all the customizability and what not.<p>Can anyone chime in on whether using zed on wsl is viable, or loses all the speed benefits?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:09:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41358641</link><dc:creator>SirLordBoss</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41358641</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41358641</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SirLordBoss in "We don't know how bad most things are nor precisely how they're bad"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is such an all-or-nothing thought. We can aim for "better", or even just "good enough", without aiming for absolute perfection or mediocrity, and things will <i>still</i> keep getting better.<p>His point is excessively perfectionistic at best, to the point of detriment, and at worst... well, it's <i>pedantic</i>.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2024 11:13:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41337285</link><dc:creator>SirLordBoss</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41337285</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41337285</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SirLordBoss in "We don't know how bad most things are nor precisely how they're bad"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>To follow this analogy, isn't it possible then for someone to study precisely what the difference is, and become an expert, thus bringing us back into the level of expertise we were at at the start of the analogy?<p>Surely the experts didn't all learn from each other; who was the first expert? That expert surely learned in some other way, so the only thing lost at the start of the analogy is the time required for someone interested to (re)achieve mastery.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 18:24:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41331601</link><dc:creator>SirLordBoss</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41331601</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41331601</guid></item></channel></rss>