<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: SirMadam</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=SirMadam</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 11:14:57 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=SirMadam" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SirMadam in "Samsung Health app threatens data deletion if users opt out AI training"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Gave the repo a once over: Self hosting [of the whole application in general] is a first-class citizen of the project, and the AI features are both:<p>a. completely optional/disable-able and<p>b. Self hosted llm friendly, with specific instructions given on how to use it with things like Ollama</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 03:28:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48901932</link><dc:creator>SirMadam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48901932</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48901932</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SirMadam in "GLM-5.2 – How to Run Locally"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>SOTA LLM specific compression achieves around ~54%! <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06252v3" rel="nofollow">https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06252v3</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 23:44:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48638119</link><dc:creator>SirMadam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48638119</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48638119</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SirMadam in "SCOTUS declines to hear dispute over copyrights for AI-generated material"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>While I would like to believe you, doesn't this legal document linked by the article show that, in at least one of the cases, the author WAS trying to apply with himself, "Mr. Allen", as the author? And not the AI?<p><a href="https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/byprrqkqxpe/AI%20COPYRIGHT%20REGISTRATION%20decision.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/byprrqkqxpe/...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 22:07:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47224866</link><dc:creator>SirMadam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47224866</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47224866</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by SirMadam in "SCOTUS declines to hear dispute over copyrights for AI-generated material"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If SCOTUS is saying that AI works, even those co-authored by humans, are not eligible for copyright/patenting;<p>Doesn't that mean any code-base that uses AI generated code does not have an implicit copyright holder? And thus even the human constructor does not have the right to apply any license [closed/open] onto it whatsoever?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 20:29:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47223613</link><dc:creator>SirMadam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47223613</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47223613</guid></item></channel></rss>