<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: StingyJelly</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=StingyJelly</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 14:10:57 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=StingyJelly" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by StingyJelly in "Android Developer Verification: Threat masquerading as protection"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's great but I want to be able to share such app with my family members coleagues</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 11:53:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48760002</link><dc:creator>StingyJelly</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48760002</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48760002</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by StingyJelly in "Android Developer Verification: Threat masquerading as protection"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We finally live in an age when I can tell a clanker that I want an app that does something that I need, connect the phone with adb and in half an hour have a working solution for my tiny problem while knowing little about android development. This is something google should embrace, not kneecap.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 08:21:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758210</link><dc:creator>StingyJelly</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758210</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758210</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by StingyJelly in "Watch a Steam Controller Skitter Itself to Its Charge Puck"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The original link to github was posted here a few days ago [0] but received no attention perhaps due to dull title. I find too funny to let it at that so here is a hackaday blogpost with a slightly catchier title. Sorry for breaking the rules slightly for the sake of entertainment :) There is also a video [1]<p>[0] <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693338">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693338</a><p>[1] <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwq-xr2fDBU&t=18" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwq-xr2fDBU&t=18</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 08:03:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758067</link><dc:creator>StingyJelly</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758067</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758067</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Watch a Steam Controller Skitter Itself to Its Charge Puck]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://hackaday.com/2026/07/01/watch-a-steam-controller-skitter-itself-to-its-charge-puck/">https://hackaday.com/2026/07/01/watch-a-steam-controller-skitter-itself-to-its-charge-puck/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758066">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758066</a></p>
<p>Points: 7</p>
<p># Comments: 2</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 08:03:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://hackaday.com/2026/07/01/watch-a-steam-controller-skitter-itself-to-its-charge-puck/</link><dc:creator>StingyJelly</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758066</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758066</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by StingyJelly in "The KIDS Act would require age checks to get online"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Or not implement it at all...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 13:45:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719226</link><dc:creator>StingyJelly</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719226</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719226</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by StingyJelly in "GrapheneOS has been ported to Android 17"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I use usb-c dac and it is honestly fine. you can get one with charging bypass and keep that one with the charger</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 12:32:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48569500</link><dc:creator>StingyJelly</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48569500</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48569500</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by StingyJelly in "Google Chrome silently installs a 4 GB AI model on your device without consent"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's charitable, but even then you probably want to avoid fingerprinting...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:12:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48019945</link><dc:creator>StingyJelly</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48019945</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48019945</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by StingyJelly in "Google Chrome silently installs a 4 GB AI model on your device without consent"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That made me avoid it for a long time but there hasn't been more concerning behavior since, so some point, we can move on.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:54:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48019776</link><dc:creator>StingyJelly</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48019776</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48019776</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by StingyJelly in "Google Chrome silently installs a 4 GB AI model on your device without consent"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think using tor in brave just makes you stand out more - stock tor browser is probably a better setup. Whonix even better.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:49:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48019721</link><dc:creator>StingyJelly</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48019721</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48019721</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by StingyJelly in "Google Chrome silently installs a 4 GB AI model on your device without consent"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is so absurd... I have to keep an old (rooted in order to hide that adb is enabled) phone connected to my home server just to use such app, because grapheneos without google services is apparently not secure enough.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:41:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48019670</link><dc:creator>StingyJelly</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48019670</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48019670</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by StingyJelly in "Google Chrome silently installs a 4 GB AI model on your device without consent"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Brave origin on linux looks pretty solid now. Now I'm using that and Librewolf.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:26:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48019545</link><dc:creator>StingyJelly</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48019545</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48019545</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by StingyJelly in "WebUSB Extension for Firefox"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You have to balance the this ease of use with increasing potential attack and fingerprinting surface. Correct approach is something in the middle - a separate off-by-default setting or recommended official extension.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 11:03:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47847170</link><dc:creator>StingyJelly</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47847170</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47847170</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by StingyJelly in "Edit store price tags using Flipper Zero"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>just secure your networks bro</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:55:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47847099</link><dc:creator>StingyJelly</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47847099</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47847099</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by StingyJelly in "Focused microwaves allow 3D printers to fuse circuits onto almost anything"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Reflowing smd paste inside print won't work reliably as the solder will tend to form blobs instead of keeping the track shape</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:17:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833199</link><dc:creator>StingyJelly</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833199</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833199</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by StingyJelly in "System Card: Claude Mythos Preview [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I wouldn't call codex considerably better. It may depend on specific codebase and your expectations, but codex produces more "abstraction for the sake of abstraction" even on simple tasks, while opus in my experience usually chooses right level of abstraction for given task.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 11:09:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47688563</link><dc:creator>StingyJelly</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47688563</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47688563</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by StingyJelly in "My MacBook keyboard is broken and it's insanely expensive to fix"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes and given that keyboard replacement is really common repair (probably most common repair on butterfly models but still quite common now), the ease of repair is extremely disproportional. In case of OP's Macbook Pro: the rivets, the number of screws, the need to disassemble everything, even having to lift the glued in battery - all just to get to the keyboard.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 13:32:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47587137</link><dc:creator>StingyJelly</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47587137</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47587137</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by StingyJelly in "My MacBook keyboard is broken and it's insanely expensive to fix"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You can use tiny drill to drill off the rivets - much less violent. I covered everything in paper / masking tape to be able to vacuum off the metal shavings and used small dremmel like electric drill with chinese used re-sharpened pcb drillbit.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 16:42:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576589</link><dc:creator>StingyJelly</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576589</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576589</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by StingyJelly in "My MacBook keyboard is broken and it's insanely expensive to fix"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The bar should be higher than "Better than glue". While repair is possible, the number of screws with many different screw types still make it needlessly time consuming / expensive.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 16:36:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576495</link><dc:creator>StingyJelly</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576495</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576495</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by StingyJelly in "My MacBook keyboard is broken and it's insanely expensive to fix"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The laptop is deffinitely designed in a way that the keyboard is extremely hard to replace. Took me like 5 hours across 2 days. Rivets are not even the worst part, I used tiny drill and carefully glued in the replacement keyboard using phone screen glue (B7000) between the keys. (glue needs to go both on the frame and on the keyboard as there is a gap that needs to be bridged) Since there are screws along 3 of its edges, I deemed it good enough. drilling and tapping or riveting would have been extra painful.<p>What makes the repair more complicated is that 
1) you need to take out basically everything to get to the keyboard. There are many different screws, luckily ifixit has a disassembly guides with their sizes. Still it was a bit painful to reassemble. 
2) One of the things you need to take out or at least lift is the glued in battery - this took a lot of careful prying with thin plastic sheet and dousing it in ipa. 
3) backlight is glued on to the case in an extremely fragile way, so it needs to be replaced with the keyboard or will probably look uneven after repair. (i reused the old one as I don't mind it but still, it could just have been glued to the keyboard itself and it would be easier to repair.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 16:29:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576391</link><dc:creator>StingyJelly</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576391</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576391</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by StingyJelly in "Apple discontinues the Mac Pro"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>it's even more tightly bound than just being soldered on<p>No. There is a reason for it but no, it's just soldered on the same carrier board as the APU, in order to be really close to it. Apple could have used a form factor like CAMM2 and it would have worked the same, be it at slightly higher cost. The reason is simply to kill upgrade options and cut manufacturing costs - same as for any other soldered ram.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 07:44:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47539973</link><dc:creator>StingyJelly</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47539973</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47539973</guid></item></channel></rss>