<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: TexanFeller</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=TexanFeller</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2026 13:24:10 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=TexanFeller" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by TexanFeller in "Jepsen: ParticleDB 1.1.4"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Is there any concrete evidence they vibe coded it? It seems 100% self-evident, but have we actually ruled out human hubris and gross incompetence?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2026 22:17:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50320801</link><dc:creator>TexanFeller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50320801</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50320801</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by TexanFeller in ""As a Language Model": Chat Template Switches LLM Self-Referential Voice"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That sounds like corporate cooption of libertarian principles, the power of large corporations is a threat to our freedoms that needs to be curtailed just like governments and religious institutions. Corporations should not have all the same rights as individual citizens.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 15:24:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49867459</link><dc:creator>TexanFeller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49867459</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49867459</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by TexanFeller in "Doomscrolling ourselves to death"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There are degrees of mindless! I know one can't substitute watching lectures for serious study, but it's a great substitute for the far more mindless and addictive content I would be tempted by otherwise. There are lots of interesting topics in the foundations of physics and areas of mathematics my undergrad didn't cover that came to my attention this way. I enjoy getting a sampler now while I don't have the time/energy after work to study them for real, and they will inform what I study when I get and/or make time for them in my life soon.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 22:21:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49591521</link><dc:creator>TexanFeller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49591521</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49591521</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by TexanFeller in "Doomscrolling ourselves to death"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>One of my problems with blocking things like YouTube is that there’s so much outstanding long form content that’s not always available elsewhere. I love watching semi popularized physics lectures like from Sean Carroll but I can’t help but click on the mindless content next to it after, or even during, my wholesome viewing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 18:30:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49589401</link><dc:creator>TexanFeller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49589401</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49589401</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by TexanFeller in "Doomscrolling ourselves to death"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I just started reading Infinite Jest and unsurprisingly it seems shockingly relevant to the doomscrolling problem. I’m aware of its flaws, but I’ve heard it recommended a number of times related to our modern problem of amusing ourselves to death. So far it’s surprisingly enjoyable, eerily relatable, and not nearly as difficult to follow as I was warned.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 18:20:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49589294</link><dc:creator>TexanFeller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49589294</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49589294</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by TexanFeller in "Java is memory efficient [audio]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>FF seems to use less RAM than Chrome for my 100+ open tabs these days. It’s just as fast for 99% of sites and surprisingly even compatibility is often better. Half the time when my wife encounters a broken webapp in Chrome it works fine when I have her try in FF.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 22:17:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49528994</link><dc:creator>TexanFeller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49528994</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49528994</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by TexanFeller in "Pgtestdb's template cloning approach to testing is fast"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For a long time I've used similar approaches for testing against Postgres, especially when using tools like Testcontainers. It's saved a massive amount of time waiting for my tests to run over the years and it's incredibly simple to implement, even manually.<p>1. Set up a container image based on our prod Postgres DB's version with current prod migrations pre-applied.<p>2. Configure Testcontainers to be reuse the container between tests, at least within the same file.<p>3. ~25 lines of init code that apply local-branch migrations to a template DB and copy test data to it on the first test.<p>4. When the template DB already exists, test setup just drop the DB and copy it fresh from the template DB.<p>I find tests that actually perform the actions catch a heck of a lot more bugs and are easier to setup up than code that uses a lot of mocking or "test implementations" of a class. And with just a little care the performance penalty is negligible and way more than worth it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 20:34:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49138199</link><dc:creator>TexanFeller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49138199</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49138199</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by TexanFeller in "Is AI reasoning right for the wrong reasons?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There are potential parallels with how AIs are trained and the evolutionary pressures that our brains likely evolved under. Human AI trainers accept/reject or give a rating to the AI's response so the selection pressure on AI models is to produce a response that is likely to be accepted by the humans "in its environment" or at least to mirror the responses of humans it's seen provide in its training data.<p>Long ago I was struck by an idea I heard about human reasoning that I paraphrase as "human reasoning evolved not to reason, but to provide reasons"[1]. Basically that the heaviest evolutionary pressures on our brain were for social utility, like for influencing others to do something for us, or giving pre/post justifications for our actions that most others are likely to accept to avoid punishment. The flawed mechanisms that we developed to do such things are not significantly grounded in logical reasoning, but can sometimes be pressed into duty for that.<p>LLM models are trained to "generate the best next token" which augments the response so far and makes the evaluator happy. When I reflect on my own mind responding quickly to someone in a meeting it doesn't feel altogether different from that. We don't typically carefully and fully logically reason before we start talking. We typically start talking and think only a little ahead about what we say next that supports and doesn't contradict what we've said already. As we're speaking we are monitoring the other person's facial expressions to infer their emotional response and adjusting our next words based on that. I think at least common neurotypical[2] conversation might be closer to the "next token" reasoning than we would be comfortable admitting.<p>[1] I _think_ who I heard say that was Hugo Mercier, on either Sean Carroll's consistently amazing science podcast or maybe on Lex Friedman before he veered into Joe Rogan emulation. I'm normally a little suspicious of the theories of psychologists and cognitive scientists, but I intuitively related to many of his lines of thinking.<p>[2] I'm arguably pretty neurodivergent in more than one way so I think my thought processes are a little different by default, but that makes me more reflective about common conversation. When I'm trying to mask and communicate more similarly to a neurotypical corporate employee I feel like I become a "stochastic parrot" that's just predicting the best next few words to improve the emotional response I'm reading in my conversation partner.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 20:18:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49138024</link><dc:creator>TexanFeller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49138024</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49138024</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by TexanFeller in "OpenRA"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I actually loved the imbalance of OG RA, I live for vaporizing my foes with tesla coils!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 20:14:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48701321</link><dc:creator>TexanFeller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48701321</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48701321</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by TexanFeller in "Code duplication is far cheaper than the wrong abstraction (2016)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Code duplication is far cheaper than the wrong abstraction<p>Very true in some sense, but I continue to encourage DRY-bias because I've literally never seen teams duplicate code responsibly and later dedupe it when it's the right time. 95% of the time this sentiment is quoted to justify shipping quick slop and stable reusable bits are never extracted into a shared lib later.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 17:13:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620631</link><dc:creator>TexanFeller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620631</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620631</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by TexanFeller in "Shall we play a game? – LLMs use tactical nukes in 95% of simulations"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Rational behavior in some situations? Mutually assured destruction’s deterrence isn’t very effective if one side is known to be hesitant to launch the nukes. It’s been argued that MAD is what’s been keeping the world relatively peaceful for the last 75 years, no mass conflicts since WW2!<p>One of my criteria for presidential candidates is that they seem willing and able to push the button when previously stated red lines are crossed, or at least are perceived to be the type capable of it. One of the characters I’ve hated most in all the books that I’ve read is the woman in The Three Body Problem who jeopardized humanity by being too soft to hit the MAD button.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 22:13:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48497128</link><dc:creator>TexanFeller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48497128</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48497128</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by TexanFeller in "10Gb/s Ethernet: what I did to get it working in my home"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> "Preparing backup..." taking an unreasonable amount of time is a regular occurrence,<p>TM heavily throttles disk I/O used for backing up in order to ensure that normal user activity isn't affected. That makes it appear that TM is dramatically slower than you would expect which greatly annoys me. This becomes obvious after you run this command which will make both the preparing and transferring phases go closer to the theoretical speed you'd expect:<p>sudo sysctl debug.lowpri_throttle_enabled=0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:34:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47967869</link><dc:creator>TexanFeller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47967869</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47967869</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by TexanFeller in "10Gb/s Ethernet: what I did to get it working in my home"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>1Gb Internet service seems low these days, much less 1Gb LAN. I have 3Gb Google Fiber service and actually get 2+ for individual downloads from some internet services like Steam. Even at 2Gb it's annoying to wait tens of minutes for 100+ GiB games to download. If I go on vacation I come home with 10s of GiBs of photos and videos on multiple devices that start syncing with cloud storage.<p>During the day I need to pull large data files from the work VPN so it's nice that that can happen at full speed even when Steam and movie streaming are also at full throttle.  Combine that with backups and moving various files back and forth to my NAS and I'm very happy to have 10Gb local wiring.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:18:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47967687</link><dc:creator>TexanFeller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47967687</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47967687</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by TexanFeller in "10Gb/s Ethernet: what I did to get it working in my home"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For a very long time I thought Time Machine had become flaky, and I'm sure it's partially to blame, but with my current setup I've literally never observed it corrupt a backup and have to start over.<p>Before I was using one of the common Synology consumer NAS boxes that are often recommended. The NAS didn't report any errors with the drives or its own hardware, but at least once a month TM would glitch on at least one of my home laptops.<p>My new setup is an Asus FLASHSTOR 12 Pro Gen2 FS6812X. For a year now it's been running without a single apparent TM glitch while backing up multiple personal laptops and my work laptop. Sometimes I'm plugged in and sometimes I'm backing up over WiFi, but it's always worked.<p>I tried various recommended settings for the Synology and nothing helped so I strongly suspect that the Synology network protocol(SMB, AFP, etc.) implementations were either buggy themselves or at least not compatible with quirks in Apple's implementations. Synology->Asus fixed all my TM problems instantly and seemingly permanantly!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 19:54:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47967419</link><dc:creator>TexanFeller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47967419</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47967419</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by TexanFeller in "10Gb/s Ethernet: what I did to get it working in my home"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm extremely happy after upgrading my network to 10gbit copper ethernet. It was much more expensive than I thought it should be, but worth it even if I only max it occasionally. Now I can easily fully saturate my 10gbit ethernet doing a first Time Machine backup or transferring files to my M.2 SSD NAS which saves me waiting rime and is satisfying to watch.<p>It's wild to me that 10gbit isn't the norm by now and tech people who should know better seem to think WiFi matches or even exceeds even 1gbit ethernet. My MBP connects to my WiFi7 setup(Ubiquiti E7) at a nominal 1.5-1.9gbit but Time Machine backups and file transfers are slower than plugging into 1gbit ethernet, probably in large part due to latency and retransmissions. Not to mention that ethernet works with near 100% reliability with dramatically less variation in speed and error rate.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 18:14:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47966264</link><dc:creator>TexanFeller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47966264</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47966264</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by TexanFeller in "A new spam policy for “back button hijacking”"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>When I first heard of the APIs that allowed websites to modify browser history it sounded like a huge mistake. I still feel that way to this day.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 15:37:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47767072</link><dc:creator>TexanFeller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47767072</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47767072</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by TexanFeller in "Why AI Sucks at Front End"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm a backend dev and I'm always hearing about how LLMs are dramatically better at frontend because of much more available training data etc. Maybe my perspective isn't as skewed as I've been led to believe and LLMs need close supervision and rework of their output there too.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 14:30:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47740135</link><dc:creator>TexanFeller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47740135</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47740135</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by TexanFeller in "Honda is killing its EVs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Toyota just had three large EV announcements and they are putting large incentives on some of them. Feels like they're serious about it and with so many others exiting the EV market lately they may have timed it well.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 23:14:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47419640</link><dc:creator>TexanFeller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47419640</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47419640</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by TexanFeller in "Leaving Google has actively improved my life"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> They ALL suck including Google Search.<p>Kagi is the ONLY search engine I know that currently doesn’t suck and  I highly recommend it to anyone who will listen. I would cancel almost any other subscription before Kagi.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 00:32:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47188249</link><dc:creator>TexanFeller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47188249</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47188249</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by TexanFeller in "Leaving Google has actively improved my life"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Since if Kagi does search as well as the Google of old, and I can adjust its searches to prioritise results from known good (to me) sites, then that probably is worth paying for<p>As I was saying in another thread Kagi is what Google would have been if they had kept improving instead of transitioning to enshitifying ~10yrs ago. If I had to pick I’d keep it over Netflix.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 00:28:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47188207</link><dc:creator>TexanFeller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47188207</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47188207</guid></item></channel></rss>